Skip to main content
Log in

Nostalgia for the ordinary: Comments on papers by Unger and Wheeler

  • Ontology Of Ordinary Things
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Kim, J., 1978, ‘Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables’,American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D.H., 1967, ‘Negative Terms’,Analysis 27, 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D.H., 1975, ‘Borderline Logic’,American Philosophical Quarterly 12, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, D.H., 1976, ‘Competing Semantics of Vagueness: Many Values Versus Super Truth’,Synthese 33, 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, P., 1979, ‘There Are No Ordinary Things’,Synthese 41, this issue, 117–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S.C., III, 1975, ‘Reference and Vagueness’,Synthese 30, 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S.C., III, 1979, ‘On That Which is Not’,Synthese 41, this issue, 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanford, D.H. Nostalgia for the ordinary: Comments on papers by Unger and Wheeler. Synthese 41, 175–184 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869570

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869570

Navigation