Abstract
Two groups of pigeons received training on a delayed conditional discrimination [working-memory (WM) trials] and a simple simultaneous discrimination [reference-memory (RM) trials]. For the same-sample group, the nominal sample stimuli on RM trials were the same as the sample stimuli on WM trials. For the different-sample group, they were different. In Experiment 1, the ratio of WM to RM trials (1:5,1:1, or 5:1) and the delay interval (1, 4, or 8 sec) were manipulated. WM trial accuracy decreased as the ratio of WM to RM trials increased for the different-sample group, but variations in this ratio had little effect in the same-sample group. In Experiment 2, variations in the ratio of WM trials to either RM trials or unfilled time intervals (UTIs) approximately equivalent to the duration of an RM trial were studied. When WM trials occurred in the context of RM trials, variations in the trial ratios produced the same results as in Experiment 1. Substituting UTIs for RM trials had a much greater effect on the performance of the same-sample group than on that of the different-sample group. In the same-sample group, WM trial accuracy was affected by variations in the ratio of WM trials to UTIs but not by variations in WM-to-RM trial ratios. These effects appear to be mediated by changes in sample-encoding processes, rather than by intrusions from previous choices or previous samples.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Edhouse, W. v., & White, K. G. (1988). Sources of proactive interference in animal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 56–70.
Roberts, W. A. (1980). Distribution of trials and intertrial retention in delayed matching-to-sample with pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 217–237.
Roitblat, H. L. (1984). Representations in pigeon working memory. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 79-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roitblat, H. L., & Scopatz, R. A. (1983). Sequential effects in pigeon delayed matching-to-sample performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 202–221.
Santi, A., Bogles, J., & Petelka, S. (1988). The effect of scopolamine and physostigmine on working and reference memory in pigeons. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 49, 61–73.
Santi, A., Hanemaayer, C., & Reason, W. (1987). The effect of scopolamine on reference and working memory in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 15, 395–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant A6378 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to Angelo Santi. Portions of this paper were presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada in June 1986.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santi, A., Reason, W., Hanemaayer, C. et al. Variations in the ratio of working-memory to reference-memory trials reveal sample-encoding effects in pigeon short-term memory. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 28, 67–70 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337651
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337651