Abstract
While ethics in publishing has been increasingly debated, there seems to be a lack of a theoretical framework for making sense of existing rules of behavior as well as for designing, managing and enforcing such rules. This letter argues that systems-oriented disciplines, such as complexity science and human factors, offer insights into new ways of dealing with ethics in publishing. Some examples of insights are presented. Also, a call is made for empirical studies that unveil the context and details of both retracted papers and the process of writing and publishing academic papers. This is expected to shed light on the complexity of the publication system as well as to support the development of a just culture, in which all participants are accountable.
Notes
Misconduct in publishing is used in this paper as a broad concept referring to a number of ethical contraventions (e.g. plagiarism, data fabrication, redundant publication, etc.) related to submitted and published scientific papers.
References
Bernstein, E. (2012). The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2), 181–216.
Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: Wiley.
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
Clegg, C. (2000). Sociotechnical principles for system design. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 463–477.
Dekker, S. (2006). The field guide to understanding human error. Burlington: Ashgate.
Dekker, S. (2007). Just culture: Balancing safety and accountability. Burlington: Ashgate.
Dekker, S. (2011). Drift into failure: From hunting broken components to understanding complex systems. London: Ashgate.
Dekker, S. (2013). Second victim: Error, guilt, trauma, and resilience. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Forrester, J. W. (1973). World dynamics. Cambridge: Wright-Allen Press.
Hale, A., & Borys, D. (2013). Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review. Safety Science, 55, 207–221.
Hollnagel, E. (2012). FRAM: The functional resonance analysis method—Modelling complex socio-technical systems. Burlington: Ashgate.
International Ergonomics Association (IEA). (2015). Definition and domains of ergonomics. http://www.iea.cc/whats/. Accessed July 13, 2015.
Kotchoubey, B., Buetof, S., & Sitaram, R. (2015). Flagrant misconduct of reviewers and editor: A case study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 829–835. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9583-3.
Moustafa, K. (2015). Blind manuscript submission to reduce rejection bias? Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 535–539. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9547-7.
Page, S. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools and societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Righi, A. W., & Saurin, T. A. (2015). Complex socio-technical systems: Characterization and management guidelines. Applied Ergonomics, 50, 19–30.
Roberts, J. (2009). An authors’ guide to publication ethics: A review of emerging standards in biomedical journals. Headache, 49, 578–589.
Saurin, T. A., Rooke, J., & Koskela, L. (2013). A complex systems theory perspective of lean production. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 5824–5838.
Skyttner, L. (2005). General systems theory problems: Perspective-practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Snowden, D., & Boone, M. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making: Wise executives tailor their approach to fit the complexity of the circumstances they face. Harvard Business Review, (November), 69–76.
Sumathipala, A., Siribaddana, S., & Patel, V. (2004). Under-representation of developing countries in the research literature: Ethical issues arising from a survey of five leading medical journals. BMC Medical Ethics 5(5). doi:10.1186/1472-6939-5-5.
Vasconcelos, S. M., & Roig, M. (2014). Prior publication and redundancy in contemporary science: Are authors and editors at the crossroads? Science and Engineering Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9599-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saurin, T.A. Ethics in Publishing: Complexity Science and Human Factors Offer Insights to Develop a Just Culture. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 1849–1854 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0