Skip to main content
Log in

Tobacco Targeting: The Ethical Complexity of Marketing to Minorities

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, there has been heightened concern regarding the marketing of potentially harmful products (PHPs) to disadvantaged markets. Three issues which commonly dominate discussions in this controversy are: (1) the potential for exploitation of vulnerable markets, (2) the tradeoff between protection of disadvantaged consumers and their rights to make informed choices and (3) the appropriateness of using the commercial speech doctrine to settle the issue of targeting minority markets with PHPs. This paper examines the arguments raised in this debate so that interested parties will better appreciate the ethical complexity of marketing PHPs to minority segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, David G., Michael D. Slater, Cheryl L. Albright and Nathan Macoby: 1987, ‘How an Unhealthy Product is Sold: Cigarette Advertising in Magazines, 1960–1985’, Journal of Communications 37(4), 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Gary and Merrie Brucks: 1988, ‘Dealing with Children's Advertising: Public Policy Issues and Alternatives’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 7, 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baquet, Claudia R.: 1987 ‘The Association of Tobacco to Cancer and Other Health Conditions in Minority Populations’, Presented to the Federal Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health (Washington, DC).

  • Board of Trustees of the State University of New York v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469 (1989).

  • Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp., 463 U.S. 60 (1983).

  • Centers for Disease Control: Smoking, Tobacco and Health, A Fact Book: 1987, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, PHS, Office on Smoking and Health, Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Services Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 567 (1980).

  • City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc., 61 USLW 4272 (1993).

  • Devesa, Susan S. and E. L. Diamond: 1983, ‘Socioeconomic and Racial Differences in Lung Cancer Incidence’, American Journal of Epidemiology 118, 818–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenfield v. Fane 61 USLW 4431 (1993).

  • Flay, Brian R.: 1987, ‘Mass Media and Smoking Cessation: A Critical Review’, American Journal of Public Health 77, 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, L.: 1984, ‘Cigarette Smoking and Coronary Heart Disease in Blacks: Comparison to Whites in a Prospective Study’, American Heart Journal 108, 802–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. and A. Brandt: 1993, ‘Criteria for Evaluating a Ban on the Advertisement of Cigarettes’, Journal of American Medical Association 269, 904–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsteon, L. D. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the Committee on Energy and Commerce (August 1, 1986) U.S. House of Representatives, 99th Congress, 2d session, in Hearings on Cigarette Advertising and Promotion.

  • Kraus, John F., Nemat O. Borhani and Charles E. Franti: 1980, ‘Socioeconomic Status, Ethnicity, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease’, American Journal of Epidemiology 11, 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, Thomas E., Kenneth E. Warner, Juliette S. Kendrick and Patrick L. Remington: 1988, ‘Smoking by Blacks and Whites: Socioeconomic and Demographic Differences’, American Journal of Public Health 78(9), 1187–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois, 496 U.S. 91 (1990).

  • Pollay, Richard W., Juny S. Lee and David Carter-Whitney: 1992, ‘Separate, But Not Equal: Racial Segmentation in Cigarette Advertising’, Journal of Advertising 21(1), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posadas de Puerto Rico v. Tourism. Co., 478 U.S. 328 (1986).

  • Schiffman, James R.: 1990, ‘After Uptown, Are Some Niches Out?’, Wall Street Journal (Jan 22), B1, B5.

  • Soldow, Gary F.: 1985, ‘The Ability of Children to Understand the Product Package: A Study of Limitations Imposed by Cognitive Developmental Stages’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 4, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobacco Issues (Part 1): Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Transporation and Hazardous Material of the Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives, Protecting Our Children From Cigarettes, July 25, 1989.

  • Tobacco Issues (Part 2): Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materials of the Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives, Targeting of Minorities by Alcohol and Tobacco Advertising, March 1, 1990 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health, Vol II: Crosscutting Issues in Minority Health (1985), US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

  • United States and Federal Communications v. Edge Broadcasting Co., 61 USLW 4759 (1993).

  • Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virigina Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976).

  • Warner, Kenneth E.: 1986, ‘Promotion of Tobacco Products: Issues and Policy Options’, Journal of Health Politices, Policy and Law 11(3), 367–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Paul J. and G. Marks: 1988, ‘Debate on the Constitutionality and Desirability of a Tobacco Products Advertising Ban’, Northern Kentucky Law Review 15, 57–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sautter, E.T., Oretskin, N.A. Tobacco Targeting: The Ethical Complexity of Marketing to Minorities. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1011–1017 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017909702926

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017909702926

Keywords

Navigation