Skip to main content
Log in

American Legal argumentation: The Law and Literature/rhetoric movement

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay discusses the most recent manifestations of the debate of the law and literature movement. The essay traces the evolution of the Law and Literature schools and identifies some of their adherents and conclusions, shows how these schools have influenced the conceptual development and teaching of American law, presents connections between the Critical Legal Studies and Law and Economics movements in the U.S., and raises questions about the Law and Literature movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, M. S.: 1985,Lying Down Together: Law, Metaphor, and Theology, Univ. of Wis., Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. A.: 1987,And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice, Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. A.: 1989, ‘The Final Report: Harvard's Affirmative Action Allegory’,Mich. L. Rev. 87, 2382–2410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. A.: 1992,Faces at the Bottom of the Well, Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, S. J.: 1989, ‘Law as Practical Reason’,S. Cal. L. Rev. 62, 747–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.: 1985,Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy and The Federalist Society.

  • Delgado, R.: 1989, ‘Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative’,Mich. L. Rev. 87, 2411–2441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R.: 1990, ‘When a Story is Just a Story: Does voice Really Matter’,Va. L. Rev. 76, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R.: 1993, ‘On Telling Stories in School: A Reply to Farber and Sherry’,Vanderbilt L. Rev. 46, 665–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. and J. Stefancic: 1993, ‘Critical Race Theory: An Annotated Bibliography’,Va. L. Rev. 79, 461–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskridge, W. and P. P. Frickey: 1990, ‘Statutory Interpretation as Practical Reasoning’,Stan. L. Rev. 42, 321–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. A.: 1988, ‘Legal Pragmatism and the Constitution’,Minn. L. Rev. 72, 1331–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. A. and P. P. Frickey: 1987, ‘Practical Reason and the First Amendment’,UCLA L. Rev. 34, 1615–1656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. A. and S. Sherry: 1993, ‘Telling Stories Out of School: An Essay on Legal Narratives’,Stan. L. Rev. 45, 807–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S.: 1989,Doing What Comes Naturally, Duke Univ. Press, Durham and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frickey, P. P.: 1990, ‘Congressional Intent, Practical Reasoning, and the Dynamic Nature of Federal Indian Law’,Cal. L. Rev. 78, 1137–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmette, E. V.: 1989, ‘Law and Literature: An Unnecessarily Suspect Class in the Liberal Arts Component of the Law School Curriculum’,Val. U. L. Rev. 23, 267–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982,In A Different Voice, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, C. and J. Resnik: 1990, ‘Convergences: Law, Literature, and Feminism’,Yale L. J. 99, 1913–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, M.: 1987,A Guide to Critical Legal Studies, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. A.: 1980,Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition From Ancient to Modern Times, Univ. of N. Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. and S. Mailloux (eds.): 1988,Interpreting Law and Literature, Northwestern Univ. Press, Evanston, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: n.d.,An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Philadelphia.

  • Matasar, R. A.: 1992, ‘Storytelling and Legal Scholarship’,Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 68, 353–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, M. J.: 1989, ‘Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story’,Mich. L. Rev. 87, 2320–2381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, W. B.: 1979, ‘Against Formalism: The Autonomous Text in Legal and Literary Interpretation’,Poetics Today 1, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, M.: 1990,Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, T.: 1993, ‘Ethics and Style: The Lessons of Literature for Law’,Stan. L. Rev. 45, 497–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papke, D. R.: 1980, ‘Law and Literature: A Comment and Bibliography of Secondary Works’,Law Library Journal 73, 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A.: 1988,Law and Literature: A Misunderstood Relation, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A.: 1990,The Problems of Jurisprudence, Univ. of Chi., Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, S.: 1982,Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scallen, E. A.: 1992, ‘Constitutional Dimensions of Hearsay Reform: Toward a Three Dimensional Confrontation Clause’,Minn. L. Rev. 76, 623–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, S.: 1986, ‘Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication’,Va. L. Rev. 72, 543–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, R.: 1988, ‘A Matter of Voice and Plot: Belief and Suspicion in Legal Storytelling’,Mich. L. Rev. 87, 543–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.: 1990, ‘The Pursuit of Pragmatism’,Yale L. J. 100, 409–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symposium: 1984, ‘Critical Legal Studies’,Stan. L. Rev. 36, 1–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symposium: 1989, ‘Legal Storytelling’,Mich. L. Rev. 87, 2073–2494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. H.: 1984,The Failure of the Word: The Protagonist as Lawyer in Modern Fiction, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. H.: 1987,When Lawyers Write, Little Brown, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. H.: 1992,Poetics And Other Strategies of Law and Literature, Columbia Univ. Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. H. and K. L. Kretschman: 1977, ‘Wigmore's ‘Legal Novels’ Expanded: A Collaborative Effort’,Maryland Law Forum 7, 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim, L. M.: 1992, ‘Law and Literature: Literature as Law/Law as Literature’,Bench and Bar of Minnesota 49, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R.: 1985, ‘Authority, Autonomy, and Choice: The Role of Consent in the Moral and Political Visions of Franz Kafka and Richard Posner’,Harv. L. Rev. 99, 384–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R.: 1987, ‘Adjudication Is Not Interpretation: Some Reservations About The Law as Literature Movement’,Tenn. L. Rev. 54, 203–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R.: 1988a, ‘Economic Man and Literary Woman: One Contrast’,Mercer L. Rev. 39, 867–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, R.: 1988b, ‘Jurisprudence and Gender’,U. Chi. L. Rev. 55, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. B.: 1973,The Legal Imagination: Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression, Little, Brown and Company, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. B.: 1984,When Words Lose Their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community, Univ. of Chic. Press, Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. B.: 1985,Heracles' Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law, Univ. of Wis. Press, Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. B.: 1990,Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism, Univ. of Chic., Chicago, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigmore, J. H.: 1913, ‘Introduction, to John Marshall Gest’,The Lawyer in Literature, pp. ix-xii, Boston Book co., Boston, Mass. (1913), rpt. (1982), W. W. Gaunt, Holmes Beach, Fla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. J.: 1991,The Alchemy of Race and Rights, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishingrad, J. (ed.): 1992,Legal Fictions: Short Stories About Lawyers and the Law, Overlook Press, Woodstock, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scallen, E.A. American Legal argumentation: The Law and Literature/rhetoric movement. Argumentation 9, 705–717 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00744751

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00744751

Key words

Navigation