Abstract
The internal logic of a semiotic view of life suggests memory is the origin of mind. Interpreting the meaning of “sign” by way of Charles S. Peirce, the object of this chapter is to provide a response to the biosemiotic problem of the origin of mind in respect to both its general and specific formulations, i.e., as evolutionary emergence and as human environmental experience. As such, I hope for this chapter to express the biosemiotic view of mind and function heuristically for future research regarding memory and mind. “Mnemo-psychography” means that the mind writes itself out of memory. In regard to biosemiotics, the thesis of mnemo-psychography suggests that the mind originates out of interaction between the environment and the biological capacity for memory. By providing a biosemiotic reading of the results of contemporary memory research, specifically the work of Eric Kandel, Daniel Schacter, and Miguel Nicolelis et al., I argue for the thesis of mnemo-psychography, over a biosemiotic version of identity theory, as the solution to the problem of the origin of mind.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Elsewhere, I discuss the topic of the relation between mnemo-psychography and the mind-body problem. Here, I am concerned to provide mnemo-psychography as a biosemiotic solution to the origin of mind problem.
- 2.
I would like to thank Dr. Bernard Baars, Dr. Patrick Reider, and Dr. Stephanie Swales for their helpful comments. And, I would like to especially thank Dr. Liz Stillwaggon Swan for her patience, dedication, and helpful comments.
Bibliography
Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Watson, J. D. (1989/2008). Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Publishing.
Anderson, M., Deely, J., Krampen, M., Ransdell, J., Sebeok, T., & Uexküll, T. (1984). A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm. Semiotica, 52(1/2), 7–47.
Barbieri, M. (2003). The organic codes: An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barbieri, M. (2008a). Biosemiotics: A new understanding of life. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 577–599.
Barbieri, M. (2008b). Is the cell a semiotic system? In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics (pp. 179–207). Dordricht: Springer.
Barbieri, M. (2008c). Life is semiosis: The biosemiotic view of nature. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 5(1/2), 29–51.
Barbieri, M. (2008d). What is biosemiotics? Biosemiotics, 1, 1–3.
Barbieri, M. (2009). A short history of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 2(2), 221–245.
Black, I. B., Adler, J. E., Dreyfus, C. F., Friedman, W. F., LaGamma, E. F., & Roach, A. H. (1988). Experience and the biochemistry of information storage in the nervous system. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Perspectives in memory research (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Brier, S. (2010). The cybersemiotic model of communication: An evolutionary view on the threshold between semiosis and informational exchange. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics (pp. 697–730). New York: Springer.
Buchanan, B. (2008). Onto-ethologies: The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. Albany: SUNY Press.
Buonomano, D. V. (2007). The biology of time across different scales. Nature Chemical Biology, 10, 594–597.
Chalmers, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.
Deacon, T. (2010). Excerpts from the symbolic species. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics (pp. 541–852). New York: Springer.
Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken: Wiley.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University.
Eder, J., & Rembold, H. (1992). Biosemiotics – A paradigm of biology: Biological signaling on the verge of deterministic chaos. Naturwissenschaften, 79(2), 60–67.
Emmeche, C. (1991). A semiotical reflection on biology, living signs and artificial life. Biology and Philosophy, 6(3), 325–340.
Favareau, D. (2007). How to make Peirce’s ideas clear. In G. Witzany (Ed.), Biosemiotics in transdisciplinary contexts (pp. 163–177). Helsink: Umweb Press.
Favareau, D. (2010). Introduction: An evolutionary history of biosemiotics. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics (pp. 1–80). New York: Springer.
Feigl, H. (1958). The “mental” and the “physical.”. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Concepts, theories and the mind-body problem (Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. II, pp. 370–497). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Goldberg, S., & Pessin, A. (1997). Gray matters: An introduction to the philosophy of mind. New York: Armonk.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row.
Hellmeier, H., Erhard, M., & Schulze, E. D. (1997). Biomass accumulation and water use under arid conditions. In F. A. Bazzaz & J. Grace (Eds.), Plant resource allocation (pp. 93–113). London: Academic.
Hoffmeyer, J. (1995). The swarming cyberspace of the body. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 3(1), 16–25.
Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. (B. J. Haveland, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hoffmeyer, J. (2006). Genes, development, and semiosis. In E. Neumann-Held & C. Rehmann-Sutter (Eds.), Genes in development: Re-reading the molecular paradigm (pp. 152–174). Durham: Duke University Press.
Hoffmeyer, J. (2010). The semiotics of nature: Code-duality. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics (pp. 583–628). New York: Springer.
Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.), On semiotic modeling (pp. 117–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jacoby, L. L., Ste-Marie, D., & Toth, J. P. (1993). Redefining automaticity: Unconscious influences, awareness, and control. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention, selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 261–282). London: Oxford University Press.
James, W. (1918). The automaton-theory. In The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Publications.
Jämsä, T. (2008). Semiosis in evolution. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics (pp. 69–100). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kandel, E. (2009). The biology of memory: A forty-year perspective. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(41), 12748–12756.
Kandel, E., & Pittenger, C. (1999). The past, the future and the biology of memory storage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 354, 2027–2052.
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason. (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kull, K., Deacon, T., Emmeche, C., Hoffmeyer, J., & Stjernfelt, F. (2009). Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. Biological Theory, 4(2), 167–173.
Mach, E. (1897). Contributions to the analysis of the sensations. (C. M. Williams, Trans.) Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co.
Marvell, L. (2007). Transfigured light: Philosophy, cybernetics and the hermetic imaginary. Bethesda: Academia Press.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2001). Actions from thoughts. Nature, 409, 403–407.
Nicolelis, M. A. L., & Lebedev, M. A. (2009). Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain-machine interfaces. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 530–540.
Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
O’Doherty, J. E., Lebedev, M. A., Ifft, P., Zhuang, J., Katie, Z., Shokur, S., Bleuler, H., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2011). Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface. Nature, 479, 228–231.
O’Doherty, J. E., Lebedev, M. A., Zeng, L., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2012). Virtual active touch using randomly patterned intracortical microstimulation. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 20(1), 85–93.
Pain, S. P. (2007). The ant on the kitchen counter. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Biosemiotic research trends (pp. 113–140). New York: Nova Science.
Pattee, H. H. (1997). The physics of symbols and the evolution of semiotic controls. In M. Coombs & M. Sulcoski (Eds.), Control mechanisms for complex systems: Issues of measurement and semiotic analysis (pp. 9–25). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). Nomenclature and divisions of triadic relations, as far as they are determined. In the Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2, pp. 289–299). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (2011). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 98–119). New York: Dover Publications.
Place, U. T. (1956). Is consciousness a brain process? British Journal of Psychology, 47, 44–50.
Schacter, D. L., & Badgaiyan, R. D. (2001). Neuroimaging of priming: New perspectives on implicit and explicit memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(1), 1–4.
Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185.
Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., & Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 853–862.
Sebeok, T. (1991). A sign is just a sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. 1, (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Smart, J. J. C. (1959). Sensations and brain processes. Philosophical Review, 68(2), 141–156.
Spear, N. E., & Riccio, D. C. (1994). Memory: Phenomena and principles. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Swan, L. S., & Goldberg, L. J. (2010). How is meaning grounded in the organism? Biosemiotics, 3, 131–146.
Tan, J. T., & Surh, C. D. (2006). T cell memory. In B. Pulendran & R. Ahmed (Eds.), From innate immunity to immunological memory (pp. 85–115). Berlin: Springer.
Tough, D. F., & Sprent, J. (1994). Turnover of naïve- and memory-phenotype T cells. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 179, 1127–1135.
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301–306.
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. (1992). Priming and memory systems. In B. Smith & G. Adelman (Eds.), Neuroscience year: Supplement 2 to the encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 130–133). Boston: Birkhauser.
Uexküll, J. (2010). The theory of meaning. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics (pp. 81–114). New York: Springer.
Witzany, G. (2010). Excerpts from the logos of the bios. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics (pp. 731–750). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scalambrino, F. (2013). Mnemo-psychography: The Origin of Mind and the Problem of Biological Memory Storage. In: Swan, L. (eds) Origins of Mind. Biosemiotics, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5419-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5418-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5419-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)