Bibliography
Mīmāmsādarśana of Jaimini with Śahara's Bhāsya. 7 volumes. Vol. 2, withKumārila's Tantravārtika (1.2–2.1). Vol. 4,with Kumārila's Tantravārtika (adhyāya 3), new ed., edited by Kāsinātha Vāsudeva Abhyamkar and Ganeśaśāstrī Ambādāsa Jośī, 1984. Ānandāśrama Sanskrit Series, no. 17. Pune.
D'Sa, Francis X, S. J. 1980. Śabdaprāmānyamin Śabara and Kumārila: Towards a Study of the MīmāmsāExperience of Language. Publications of the De Nobili Research Library, no. 7. Vienna.
Gächter, Othmar. 1983. Hermeneutics and Language in Pūrva Mīmāmsá: A Study in Śábara Bhāsya. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Gangānātha Jhā. 1942. Pūrvamīmāmsā in its sources. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University.
Gagānātha Jhā, trans. 1903–24. Tantravārttika: A Commentary on Śabara's Bhāsya on the Pūrvamīmāmsā Sūof Jaimini, by Kumārila Bha09-1009-11a, 2 vols. Calcutta. 2d ed. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1983.
Gagānātha Jhā. 1933. Śābara-bhāsya. 3 vols. GOS, nos. 66, 70, 73. Baroda: Oriental Institute. Reprint: 1973.
Pashupatinath Sastri. 1923. Introduction to Purva-Mīmāmsa. Calcutta. (Ph.D. diss., University of Calcutta, 1924.) Second Edition: Gaurinath Shastri, ed. Chaukhambha Orientalia, 1980.
Scharf, Peter. 1990. “The Denotation of Generic Terms in Ancient Indian Grammar, Nyāya, and Mīmāmsā.” Ph. D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Subha Rao, Veluri. 1969.The Philosophy of a Sentence and its Parts. New Delhi: Munshi Ram Manohar Lal.
Taber, John A. 1989. “The Theory of the Sentence in Pūrva Mīmā10-02sā and Western Philosophy,”JIP 17, no. 4 (December): 407–30.
Verpoorten, Jean-Marie. 1987. Mīmāmsa Literature. A History of Indian Literature, ed. Jan Gonda, vol. 6, fasc. 5. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scharf, P.M. Assessing Śabara's arguments for the conclusion that a generic term denotes just a class property. J Indian Philos 21, 1–10 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092742
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092742