Überlegungen zum ontischen Status des Geldes

Abstract

Ranging from Plato to Marx, one can only find a few philosophers who have talked about money without detesting it. Naturally, economists are avoiding such an attitude. But they deliver only functional definitions, nothing which could give a hint at the essence of money. The essay tries to clarify it by delineating a currency as an ‘ens ficitivum’ – created by our semiotic activities, which have been analysed by Charles Sanders Peirce. So, the thesis is: Money is basically a sign indicating at a present time one’s ability to handle future events.

Keywords

function of money | medium of exchange | payment | value retention | ens fictivum | semiotics, sign | Funktion des Geldes | Tauschmittel | Zahlungsmittel | Wertaufbewahrung | ens fictivum | semiotische Tätigkeit | Zeichen

Related content