Abstract
This paper discusses the individuation of characters for the use asunits by geneticists at the beginning of the 20th century. Thediscussion involves the Presence and Absence Hypothesis as a case study. It issuggested that the gap between conceptual consideration and etiological factorsof individuating of characters is being handled by way of mutual adjustment.Confrontation of a suggested morphological unit character with experimentresults molded the final boundaries of it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateson W. 1902a. ‘The Facts of Heredity in the Light of Mendel's Discovery'. In: Punnett R.C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson Vol. 2. Johnson Reprint Corporauon, New York and London, pp. 29–68.
Bateson W. 1902b. ‘Notes on the Resolution of Compound Characters by Cross-Breeding'. In: Punnett R.C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson Vol. 2. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York and London, pp. 69–73.
Bateson W. 1905a. ‘A Suggestion as to the Nature of the “Walnut” Comb in Fowls'. In: Punnett R.C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson Vol. 2. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York and London, pp. 135–138.
Bateson W. 1905b. ‘Notes on the Progress of Mendelian Studies'. In: Punnett R.C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson Vol. 2. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York and London, pp. 121–134.
Bateson W. 1907. ‘Facts Limiting the Theory of Heredity'. In: Punitett R.C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson Vol. 2. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York and London, pp. 162–177.
Bateson W. 1926. ‘Segregation'. In: Punnett R.C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson Vol. 2. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York and London, pp. 405–440.
Bateson W., Saunders E.R. and Punnett R.C. 1906. ‘Experimental Studies in the Physiology of Heredity'. In: Punnett R.C. (ed.), Scientific Papers of William Bateson Vol. 2. Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York and London, pp. 152–161.
Bowler P.J. 1989. The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Campbell K. 1976. Metaphysics: An Introduction. Encino, Dickenson publishing Company, California.
Carlson E.A. 1966/1989. The Gene: A Critical History. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, Ames.
Castle W.E. 1906. ‘Yellow Mice and Gametic Purity'. Science n. s. 24: 275–281.
Castle W.E. 1915. ‘Muller on the Constancy of Mendelian Factors'. The American Naturalist 49: 37–42.
Castle W.E. 1919. ‘Piebald Rats and the Theory of the Genes'. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 5: 126–130.
Coleman W.E. 1970. ‘Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative thought in Science'. Centaurus 15: 228–315.
Davenport C.B. 1908. ‘Determination of Dominance in Mendelian Inheritance'. Proceedings of the American philosophical Society 47: 59–63.
Dawkins R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Falk R. 1991. ‘The Dominance of Traits in Genetic Analysis'. Journal of the History of Biology 24: 457–484.
Falk R. 2001. ‘The Rise and Fall of Dominance'. Biology and Philosophy 16: 285–323.
Goodman N. 1955/1973. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
Gould S.J. and Lewontin R. 1979/1984. ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A Cntique of the Adaptionist Program'. proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 205, 581–598. In: Sober E. (ed.), Conceptual Issue in Evolutionary Biology. MIT Piess, Cambridge, MA, pp. 252–270.
Gregory R.P. 1903. ‘The Seed Character of Pisum sativum'. The New Phytologist 2: 226–228.
Hull D.L. 1974. Philosophy of Biological Science. prentic-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Hurst C.C. 1906. ‘Mendelian Characters in Plants and Animals’ Report of the Third International Conference on Genetics of the Royal Horticultural Society. Spottiswoode, London 114–129.
Morgan T.H., Sturtevant A.H., Muller H.J. and Bridges C.B. 1915. The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. Constable & Company, London.
Muller H.J. 1914. ‘The Bearing of the Selection Experiments of Castle and Phillips on the Variability of Genes'. The American Naturalist 48: 567–576.
Punnett R.C. 1927. Mendelism. 7th edn. Macmillan, London.
Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of justice. The Belknap of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Sarkar S. 1998. Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Schwartz S. 2000. ‘The Differential Concept of the Gene: Past and Present'. In: Beurton P., Falk R. and Rheinberger H.-J. (eds), The Concept of The Gene in Development and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 26–39.
Shull G.H. 1909. ‘The “Presence and Absence” Hypothesis'. The American Naturalist 43: 410–419.
Sober E. 1990. ‘Let's Razor Ockham's Razor', Reprinted. In: Sober E. (ed.), From a Biological Point of View: Essays in Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994., pp. 136–157.
Sturtevant A.H. 1965. A History of Genetics. Harper and Row, New York.
Swinburne R.G. 1962. ‘The Presence-and-Absence Theory'. Annals of Science 18: 131–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, S. Characters as units and the case of the presence and absence hypothesis. Biology & Philosophy 17, 369–388 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020131508987
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020131508987