Europe PMC
Do data resources managed by EMBL-EBI and our collaborators make a difference to your work?
If so, please take 10 minutes to fill in our survey, and help us make the case for why sustaining open data resources is critical for life sciences research.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


The problem of psychological pain caused by discussions of do not resuscitate status with patients is addressed. Case histories of patients with such distress are given. We propose that not all patients should be informed of their do not resuscitate status, that the information about such status be given incrementally, and that the giving of further information be guided by the patient's reaction to earlier information. While some affirm the duty of the physician always to inform the patient about his or her do not resuscitate status, we affirm the duty of the physician to determine whether the patient wishes to enter into this discussion.

Free full text 


Logo of jmedethLink to Publisher's site
J Med Ethics. 1989 Dec; 15(4): 186–190.
PMCID: PMC1375832
PMID: 2614787

Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients.

Abstract

The problem of psychological pain caused by discussions of do not resuscitate status with patients is addressed. Case histories of patients with such distress are given. We propose that not all patients should be informed of their do not resuscitate status, that the information about such status be given incrementally, and that the giving of further information be guided by the patient's reaction to earlier information. While some affirm the duty of the physician always to inform the patient about his or her do not resuscitate status, we affirm the duty of the physician to determine whether the patient wishes to enter into this discussion.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (927K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Ruark JE, Raffin TA. Initiating and withdrawing life support. Principles and practice in adult medicine. N Engl J Med. 1988 Jan 7;318(1):25–30. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Angell M. Respecting the autonomy of competent patients. N Engl J Med. 1984 Apr 26;310(17):1115–1116. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Muslin H, Schade S. On the do not resuscitate policy. Perspect Biol Med. 1988 Winter;31(2):285–290. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Spencer SS. Sounding board. "Code" or "no code": a nonlegal opinion. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jan 18;300(3):138–140. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Bedell SE, Pelle D, Maher PL, Cleary PD. Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact? JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):233–237. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.