Skip to main content

Determining Oneself and Determining One’s Self

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thick (Concepts of) Autonomy

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 146))

  • 512 Accesses

Abstract

In this essay, I exploit an ambiguity in the concept of self-determination. Self-de Green termination can mean to determine oneself in choices and actions or to determine one’s self. The second kind of self-determination leads to our capacity to imagine alternative selves of ourselves, which are to be actualized. This creates the basis for a normative conception of self-determination, i.e. a conception that incorporates the aspect of a right or good way to determine oneself. I defend a normative interpretation of self-determination, which is illustrated by reference to three theorists: Harry Frankfurt, Thomas Hill Green and John Stuart Mill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. Two Concepts of Liberty. In Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, ed. Henry Hardy, 166–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bransen. Jan. 2002. Making and Finding Ourselves. In Personal and Moral Identity, ed. Albert W. Musschenga et al., 77–96. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, David O. 2003. Perfectionism and the Common Good: Themes in the Philosophy of T. H. Green. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, John. 1991a. Liberalism and Individual Positive Freedom. Ethics 101 (2): 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991b. Autonomy and Personal History. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Mark. 2007. Self-Realization: Politics and the Good Life in Modern Times. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1980. Absurd Self-Fulfillment. In Freedom and Fulfillment: Philosophical Essays, 297–330. Princeton University Press 1992: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry. 1971. Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Journal of Philosophy 68 (1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. The Importance of What We Care About. In The Importance of What We Care About, 80–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Identification and wholeheartedness. In The importance of what we care about, 159–176. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. On Caring. In Necessity, Volition, and Love, 155–180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. The Reasons of Love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, Volker. 1999. Selbstbestimmung: Das Prinzip der Individualität [Self-Determination: The Principle of Individuality]. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, Raymond. 1995. Freedom as an Ideal. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 69: 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan. 1998. Self-Fulfillment. Princeton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, Jonathan. 1988. I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 1991. Mill’s Conception of Happiness and the Theory of Individuality. In J.S. Mill: On Liberty in Focus, ed. J. Gray and G.W. Smith, 190–211. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Thomas Hill. 1879. On the Different Senses of ‘Freedom’ as Applied to Will and to the Moral Progress of Man. In The Works of Thomas Hill Green, ed. P. Nicholson, vol. II, 308–333. London: Thoemmes Continuum 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1883. Prologomena to Ethics. In The Works of Thomas Hill Green, ed. P. Nicholson, vol. IV, 1–427. London: Thoemmes Continuum 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, Martina. 2000. Freier Wille ohne Wunschkritik – Autonomie als Zustimmung zum eigenen Wünschen [Free Will without Critiquing Desires – Autonomy as Affirmation of Own Desires]. In Autonomes Handeln: Beiträge zur Philosophie von Harry G. Frankfurt, ed. M. Betzler and B. Guckes, 153–166. Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1843. A System of Logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive Part II. In Collected Works, ed. J.M. Robson, vol. VIII. Toronto: Toronto University Press 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1859. On Liberty. In Collected Works, ed. J.M. Robson, vol. XVIII, 213–310. Toronto: Toronto University Press 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1861. Utilitarianism. In Collected Works, ed. J.M. Robson, vol. X, 203–259. Toronto: Toronto University Press 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshana, Marina. 2010. The Importance of How We See Ourselves: SelfIdentity and Responsible Agency. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quante, Michael. 2007. Person. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechtman, Marya. 2004. SelfExpression and SelfControl. Ratio 17 (4): 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seel, Martin. 2002. Sich bestimmen lassen: Ein revidierter Begriff der Selbstbestimmung [To Let Oneself be Determined: A Revised Concept of Self-Determination]. In Sich bestimmen lassen: Studien zur theoretischen und praktischen Philosophie, 279–298. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simhony, Avital. 1993. Beyond Negative and Positive Freedom: T.H. Green’s View of Freedom. Political Theory 21 (1): 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1985. SelfInterpreting Animals. In Human Agency and Language, Philosophical Papers I, 45–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhat, Ernst. 1989. Self-consciousness and Self-Determination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, David. 2006. Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Fabian Wendt, Andrea Esser and participants at the “Thick (Concepts of) Autonomy” conference in Münster (2012) and at the University of Arizona (2014) for helpful comments. This paper is a revised version of an article published in German in Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie in 2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Schramme .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schramme, T. (2022). Determining Oneself and Determining One’s Self. In: Childress, J.F., Quante, M. (eds) Thick (Concepts of) Autonomy. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80991-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics