Skip to main content

Absolute Poverty

Human Dignity, Self-Respect, and Dependency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization

Part of the book series: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy ((LOET,volume 24))

Abstract

The paper deals with the question of whether poverty as such violates the dignity of persons. It is argued that it does. This is, it is argued, not due to a lack of basic goods, nor to the fact that poverty prevents persons from enjoying the rights they have, particularly the right to bodily integrity. Poverty does violate dignity, so it is argued, insofar as poor people are dependent on others in a degrading way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Margalit (1996: 44): “[S]elf-respect and self-esteem […] can and should be distinguished […].”; and Margalit (1996: 24): “Self-respect, in contrast to self-esteem, is the honour a person grants herself solely on the basis of the awareness that she is a human.” However, it is not clear whether Margalit is really able to distinguish between self-respect and self-esteem. His paradox of humiliation consists in the fact that we have no reason to feel humiliated when being treated in a humiliating way. What is affected is self-esteem. Humiliation gives us a reason to esteem ourselves less. Either way, it is a violation of rights.

  2. 2.

    This is a phenomenon that we can also find in the context of torture. The victim is at the mercy of the torturer, evident in Jean Améry’s descriptions of his experiences (Améry 1977: 55).

  3. 3.

    As Henry Shue has in mind when he writes: “By minimal economic security, or subsistence, I mean unpolluted water, adequate food, adequate clothing, adequate shelter, and minimal preventive health care” (Shue 1996: 23).

  4. 4.

    See Nickel (2007: 141): “The right to basic education focuses on literacy, numeracy, and preparation for social participation, citizenship, and economic activity. It helps orient social rights towards action, choice, self-help, mutual aid.”

  5. 5.

    See Scanlon (1998: 185): “Infants and young children are not separate kinds of creatures. Rather, infancy and childhood are, in normal cases, stages in the life of a being who will have the capacity for judgement-sensitive attitudes.”

  6. 6.

    If one has contributed to the poverty of others, it is, of course, one’s duty to fight this poverty as well, and in this case it is a duty of compensation.

References

  • Améry, Jean. 1977. Jenseits von Schuld und Sühne. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, Philipp et al. 1998. Menschenwürde vs. Würde der Kreatur. Freiburg: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, Avishai. 1996. The decent society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, James. 2007. Making sense of human rights. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaber, Peter. 2007a. Achtung vor Personen. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 4: 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaber, Peter. 2007b. Globale Hilfspflichten. In Weltarmut und Ethik, eds. Barbara Bleisch and Peter Schaber, 139–152. Paderborn: Mentis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, Henry. 1996. Basic rights. Subsistence, affluence, and US foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. 1993. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicker, Paul. 1998. Poverty. In Encyclopedia of applied ethics (3), ed. Ruth Chadwick, 1625–1632. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, Ralf. 2003. Menschenwürde und das Paradox der Entwürdigung. In Menschenwürde. Annäherungen an einen Begriff, ed. Ralf Stoecker, 133–151. Wien: Öbv & Hpt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Schaber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaber, P. (2011). Absolute Poverty. In: Kaufmann, P., Kuch, H., Neuhaeuser, C., Webster, E. (eds) Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9661-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics