Abstract
Why should all human beings have certain rights simply by virtue of being human? One justification is an appeal to religious authority. However, in increasingly secular societies this approach has its limits. An alternative answer is that human rights are justified through human dignity. This paper argues that human rights and human dignity are better separated for three reasons. First, the justification paradox: the concept of human dignity does not solve the justification problem for human rights but rather aggravates it in secular societies. Second, the Kantian cul-de-sac: if human rights were based on Kant’s concept of dignity rather than theist grounds, such rights would lose their universal validity. Third, hazard by association: human dignity is nowadays more controversial than the concept of human rights, especially given unresolved tensions between aspirational dignity and inviolable dignity. In conclusion, proponents of universal human rights will fare better with alternative frameworks to justify human rights rather than relying on the concept of dignity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
When I refer to human rights, I mean as laid down in the legal instruments listed in Table 1.
R. v Kapp 2008 Supreme Court Canada 41 at § 22: “… human dignity is an abstract and subjective notion that, even with the guidance of the four contextual factors, cannot only become confusing and difficult to apply; it has also proven to be an additional burden on equality claimants, rather than the philosophical enhancement it was intended to be.”
For instance one could maintain: “Since Catholics generally believe in God-given human dignity, and may therefore accept human rights indirectly, I shall accept the term’s use in this legal instrument, even though I am only interested in human rights.”
Thanks to AH Banisadr for this information.
Foundationalism is the attempt to stop infinite justification regress by agreeing on basic beliefs that are self-evident. A foundationalist will therefore argue that one value or concept or belief, e.g. human dignity, can provide a justification for others, which are not self-evident.
Rorty is writing about the right to access to health care. Hence, his reference to the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki rather than any of the human rights instruments from my Table 1. However, his general argument applies to both.
This might have been Kant’s most likely position. According to Oliver Sensen (2009: 104), “Kant does not seem to give an argument that all human beings have an absolute worth”.
Ein Kranz ist gar viel leichter binden, als ihm ein würdig Haupt zu finden. My translation.
I take the Traditional Catholic understanding of dignity to be an example of religious understandings. Hence, my claim is not that only Traditional Catholics can justify human rights through human dignity. Other religions are likely to have equally tenable justifications at their disposal, as long as the justification is used only amongst believers.
References
Bedau H (1982) International human rights. In: Regan T, van de Veer D (eds) And justice for all. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, pp 287–307
Beyleveld D, Brownsword R (2001) Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Birnbacher D (2004) Menschenwürde—abwägbar oder unabwägbar? In: Kettner M (ed) Biomedizin und Menschenwürde. Edition Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp 249–271
Bontekoe R (2008) The nature of dignity. Lexington Books, Lanham
Bruce S (2002) God is dead: secularization in the west. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford
Glover J, Topping A (2006) Religion does more harm than good—poll, http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/dec/23/religion.topstories3
Griffin J (2008) On human rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Groeschner R (2005) Menschenwürde als Konstitutionsprinzip. In: Siegetsleitner A, Knoepfller N (eds) Menschenwürde im interkulturellen Dialog. Alber Verlag, München, pp 17–39
Hill T Jr (1997) Must respect be earned? In: Peterson GB (ed) Tanner lectures on human values 18. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City
Höffe O (2002) Medizin ohne Ethik? Edition Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
John Paul II (1995) Evangelium vitae, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae_en.html
Kant I (1785, 1998) Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kant I (1797, 1990) Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg
Keown D (2000) Contemporary Buddhist ethics. Routledge, London
Koran, Chapter al-Isra, verse 70; Shura, verse 7; Luqman, verse 10. All verses from the Koran are from the 1946 English translation by A. Yusuf Ali
Locke J (1690, 2002) The Second Treatise of Civil Government, http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.htm
Macklin R (2003) Dignity is a useless concept. Br Med J 327:586
Meilaender G (1995) Body, soul, and bioethics. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame
Nickel JW (2007) Making sense of human rights, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford
Ninth International Conference of American States (1948) American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, http://www.cidh.oas.org/Basicos/English/Basic2.American%20Declaration.htm
Nussbaum M (2000) Women and human development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
O’Neill O (1996) Towards justice and virtue: a constructive account of practical reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pinker S (2008) The stupidity of dignity, http://richarddawkins.net/articles/2567
Rachels J (1990) Created from animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rorty R (1993) Human rights, rationality, and sentimentality, http://web1.uct.usm.maine.edu/~bcj/issues/three/rorty.html
Schroeder D (2006) A child’s life or a “little bit of torture“—state-sanctioned violence and dignity. Camb Q Health Care Ethics 15(2):188–201
Schroeder D (2008) Dignity—two riddles and four concepts. Camb Q Health Care Ethics 17(2):230–238
Schroeder D (2010) Dignity—one, two, three, four, five; still counting. Camb Q Health Care Ethics 19(1):118–125
Schroeder D (2011) Dignity—conceptual ambiguities in the Terri Schiavo Case. In: Joerden J, Hilgendorf E, Petrillo N, Thiele F (eds) Menschenwürde und moderne Medizintechnik. Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, pp 327–345
Sensen O (2009) Dignity and the formula of humanity. In: Timmermann J (ed) Kant’s groundwork: a critical guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 102–118
Sensen O (2011) Human dignity in historical perspective: the contemporary and traditional paradigms. Eur J Polit Theory 10(1):71–91
Spaemann R (1987) Über den Begriff der Menschenwürde. In: Boeckenfoerde EW, Spaemann R (eds) Menschenrechte und Menschenwürde. Kletta-Cotta, Stuttgart, pp 195–313
Statman D (2000) Dignity, humiliation and self-respect. Philos Psychol 13(4):523–540
Sunstein C (1995) Incompletely theorized agreements. Harv Law Rev 108(7):1733–1748
The President’s Council on Bioethics (2008) Human dignity and bioethics, http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/human_dignity/
Tiedemann P (2006) Was ist Menschenwürde? Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt
Tugendhat E (1993) Vorlesungen über Ethik. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch, Frankfurt
Ullrich D (2003) Concurring visions: human dignity in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany, in: Global Jurist Frontiers, 3(1)
United Nations (1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights, http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
van Steendam G, Dinnyes A, Mallet J, Roosendaal HE (2006) The Budapest meeting 2005 intensified networking on ethics of science: the case of reproductive cloning, germline gene therapy and human dignity. Sci Eng Ethics 12(4):731–793
Waldron J (2009) Dignity, rank and rights, the 2009 Tanner Lectures at UC Berkeley, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 09-50, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1461220
Walters J (1997) What is a person? An ethical exploration. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Wetz FJ (2004) Menschenwürde als Opium fürs Volk. Der Wertstatus von Embryonen. In: Kettner M (ed) Biomedizin und Menschenwürde. Edition Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp 221–248
Wood A (1999) Kant’s ethical thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wood A (2007) Human dignity, right and the realm of ends. Keynote Address to the Conference on Dignity and Law, Cape Town University Law School, July, 2007, http://www.stanford.edu/~allenw/webpapers/keynote2007.doc
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Thanks to the CAPPE seminar at the Australian National University, especially Thomas Pogge, for feedback on an earlier version of this paper. Thanks also to John Tobin for discussions on the justifications for the human right to health care. Thanks to Julie Cook Lucas, Armin Schmidt and two anonymous referees for excellent comments on the first written draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schroeder, D. Human Rights and Human Dignity. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 15, 323–335 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9326-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9326-3