Skip to main content
Log in

Indexicals and the theory of reference

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bennett, Jonathan,Linguistic Behaviour, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devitt, Michael, ‘Singular Terms’,Journal of Philosophy 71 (1974), pp. 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devitt, Michael,Designation, Columbia U. Press, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, Gareth, ‘Understanding Demonstratives,’ in H. Parret and J. Bouveresse (eds.),Meaning and Understanding, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Field, Hartry, ‘Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role,’Journal of Philosophy 74 (1977), pp. 379–409.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Field, Hartry, ‘Mental Representation,’Erkenntnis 13 (1978), pp. 9–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fodor, Jerry,The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grice, H. P., ‘Meaning,’Philosophical Review 66 (1957), pp. 377–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning,’Foundations of Language 4 (1968), pp. 225–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning and Intentions,’Philosophical Review 78 (1969), pp. 147–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harman, Gilbert, ‘Is There Mental Representation?’, in C. Wade Savage (ed.),Perception and Cognition: Issues in the Foundations of Psychology (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IX), U. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan, David, ‘Demonstratives,’ unpublishedMS. (1977).

  13. Kaplan, David, ‘Dthat,’ in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr., and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.),Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. U. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lewis, David,Convention, Harvard U. Press, Cambridge, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis, David, ‘Radical Interpretation,’Synthese 23 (1974), pp. 331–334.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis, David, ‘Languages and Language,’ in Keith Gunderson (ed.),Language Mind, and Knowledge (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VII), U. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loar, Brian,Sentence Meaning, unpublished D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University, 1972.

  18. Loar, Brian, ‘Two Theories of Meaning,’ in Gareth Evans and John McDowell (eds.),Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loar, Brian, ‘The Semantics of Singular Terms,’Philosophical Studies 30 (1976), pp. 353–377.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Loar, Brian, ‘Ramsey's Theory of Belief and Truth,’ in D. H. Mellor (ed.),Prospects for Pragmatism, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Loar, Brian,Mind and Meaning, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peacocke, Christopher, ‘Proper Names, Reference, and Rigid Designation,’ in Simon Blackburn (ed.),Meaning, Reference and Necessity: New Studies in Semantics. Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peacocke, Christopher, ‘Truth Definitions and Actual Languages,’ in Evans and McDowell (see [18]).

  24. Quine, W. V.,Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Quine, W. V., ‘Ontological Relativity,’ inOntological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia U. Press, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quine, W. V., ‘Mind and Verbal Dispositions,’ in Samuel Guttenplan (ed.),Mind and Language: Wolfson College Lectures 1974, Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schiffer, Stephen,Meaning, Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schiffer, Stephen, ‘Naming and Knowing,’Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. II: Studies in the Philosophy of Language (1977), pp. 28–41; reprinted in French, Uehling, and Wettstein (see [13]).

  29. Schiffer, Stephen, ‘The Basis of Reference,’Erkenntnis 13 (1978), pp. 171–206.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schiffer, Stephen, ‘Truth and the Theory of Content,’ in Parret and Bouveresse (see [4]).

  31. Strawson, P. F., ‘Intention and Convention in Speech Acts,’Philosophical Review 73 (1964), pp. 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Strawson, P. F., ‘Meaning and Truth,’ inLogico-Linguistic Papers, Methuen, London, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

During the eleven years between 1969 and 1980 I had countless conversations on the topics of reference with Gareth Evans; always I was provoked, stimulated, corrected, and enlightened by them; he considerably influenced my thinking about reference. His tragic death, at the age of 34, on August 10, 1980, deprived me of a dear friend, and philosophy of one of its best.

Brian Loar has most influenced my thoughts on the topics of this paper. In fact, for years my thoughts on these matters have been so intertwined with his that it is in some instances difficult for me to say exactly which strands belong to whom. Another unrelenting physicalist colleague, Hartry Field, has, through his writings and in numerous conversations, also much affected my ideas on reference. I should also like to record my gratitude to Keith Donnellan, Paul Grice, R. M. Harnish, George Myro, Christopher Peacocke, and Richard Warner for beneficial discussion on the topics of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiffer, S. Indexicals and the theory of reference. Synthese 49, 43–100 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063915

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063915

Navigation