Bibliography
Bennett, Jonathan,Linguistic Behaviour, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1976.
Devitt, Michael, ‘Singular Terms’,Journal of Philosophy 71 (1974), pp. 183–205.
Devitt, Michael,Designation, Columbia U. Press, New York, 1980.
Evans, Gareth, ‘Understanding Demonstratives,’ in H. Parret and J. Bouveresse (eds.),Meaning and Understanding, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1980.
Field, Hartry, ‘Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role,’Journal of Philosophy 74 (1977), pp. 379–409.
Field, Hartry, ‘Mental Representation,’Erkenntnis 13 (1978), pp. 9–61.
Fodor, Jerry,The Language of Thought, Crowell, New York, 1975.
Grice, H. P., ‘Meaning,’Philosophical Review 66 (1957), pp. 377–88.
Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning,’Foundations of Language 4 (1968), pp. 225–42.
Grice, H. P., ‘Utterer's Meaning and Intentions,’Philosophical Review 78 (1969), pp. 147–77.
Harman, Gilbert, ‘Is There Mental Representation?’, in C. Wade Savage (ed.),Perception and Cognition: Issues in the Foundations of Psychology (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IX), U. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1978.
Kaplan, David, ‘Demonstratives,’ unpublishedMS. (1977).
Kaplan, David, ‘Dthat,’ in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr., and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.),Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. U. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1979.
Lewis, David,Convention, Harvard U. Press, Cambridge, 1969.
Lewis, David, ‘Radical Interpretation,’Synthese 23 (1974), pp. 331–334.
Lewis, David, ‘Languages and Language,’ in Keith Gunderson (ed.),Language Mind, and Knowledge (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VII), U. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1975.
Loar, Brian,Sentence Meaning, unpublished D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University, 1972.
Loar, Brian, ‘Two Theories of Meaning,’ in Gareth Evans and John McDowell (eds.),Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1976.
Loar, Brian, ‘The Semantics of Singular Terms,’Philosophical Studies 30 (1976), pp. 353–377.
Loar, Brian, ‘Ramsey's Theory of Belief and Truth,’ in D. H. Mellor (ed.),Prospects for Pragmatism, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1980.
Loar, Brian,Mind and Meaning, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1981.
Peacocke, Christopher, ‘Proper Names, Reference, and Rigid Designation,’ in Simon Blackburn (ed.),Meaning, Reference and Necessity: New Studies in Semantics. Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, 1975.
Peacocke, Christopher, ‘Truth Definitions and Actual Languages,’ in Evans and McDowell (see [18]).
Quine, W. V.,Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1960.
Quine, W. V., ‘Ontological Relativity,’ inOntological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia U. Press, New York, 1969.
Quine, W. V., ‘Mind and Verbal Dispositions,’ in Samuel Guttenplan (ed.),Mind and Language: Wolfson College Lectures 1974, Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1975.
Schiffer, Stephen,Meaning, Oxford U. Press, Oxford, 1972.
Schiffer, Stephen, ‘Naming and Knowing,’Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. II: Studies in the Philosophy of Language (1977), pp. 28–41; reprinted in French, Uehling, and Wettstein (see [13]).
Schiffer, Stephen, ‘The Basis of Reference,’Erkenntnis 13 (1978), pp. 171–206.
Schiffer, Stephen, ‘Truth and the Theory of Content,’ in Parret and Bouveresse (see [4]).
Strawson, P. F., ‘Intention and Convention in Speech Acts,’Philosophical Review 73 (1964), pp. 439–460.
Strawson, P. F., ‘Meaning and Truth,’ inLogico-Linguistic Papers, Methuen, London, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
During the eleven years between 1969 and 1980 I had countless conversations on the topics of reference with Gareth Evans; always I was provoked, stimulated, corrected, and enlightened by them; he considerably influenced my thinking about reference. His tragic death, at the age of 34, on August 10, 1980, deprived me of a dear friend, and philosophy of one of its best.
Brian Loar has most influenced my thoughts on the topics of this paper. In fact, for years my thoughts on these matters have been so intertwined with his that it is in some instances difficult for me to say exactly which strands belong to whom. Another unrelenting physicalist colleague, Hartry Field, has, through his writings and in numerous conversations, also much affected my ideas on reference. I should also like to record my gratitude to Keith Donnellan, Paul Grice, R. M. Harnish, George Myro, Christopher Peacocke, and Richard Warner for beneficial discussion on the topics of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schiffer, S. Indexicals and the theory of reference. Synthese 49, 43–100 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063915
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063915