Skip to main content
Log in

Is there imaginary loudness? Reconsidering phenomenological method

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because imagination constitutes an indispensable tool of phenomenology, e.g., in understanding another author’s description, in eidetic reduction, etc., the practicability of phenomenological method and its claim to objectivity ought to be reconsidered with regard to its dependence on imagination. Auditory imagery serves to illustrate problems involved in grasping and analyzing imaginative contents – loudness in this case. Similar to phonetic segmentation and classification, phenomenologists segment and classify mental acts and contents. Just as phoneticians rely on experts’ evaluations of notations to reach valid results, phenomenologists may try to develop similar agreement procedures to escape the ‘subjectivism’ of their solitary first-person approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A., and Logie, R. 1992. Auditory imagery and working memory. In: D. Reisberg (ed), Auditory Imagery, pp. 179–197. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, A. R. 1992. Musical aspects of auditory imagery. In: D. Reisberg (ed), Auditory Imagery, pp. 1–27. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, T. L., and Stoeckig, K. 1992. The representation of pitch in musical images. In: D. Reisberg (ed), Auditory Imagery, pp. 199–235. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1959. Erste Philosophie (1923/24): Zweiter Teil. Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion, Ed. Rudolf Boehm. Den Haag: Nijhoff. (Husserliana, VIII.) %%

  • %%Husserl, E. 1966. Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918-1926, Ed. %%and intro. M. Fleischer. Den Haag: Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, E. 1977. Cartesian Meditations, Trans. D. Cairns. The Hague: Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, E. 1973. Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic, Trans. J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP.

  • Husserl, E. 1997. Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907, Trans. R. Rojcewicz. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Collected Works, VII.)

  • Husserl, E. 2001. Logical Investigations, Vol. II, Transl. J. N. Findlay, Ed. D. Moran. London, New York: Routledge.

  • Intons-Peterson, M. J. 1992. Components of auditory imagery. In: D. Reisberg (ed), Auditory Imagery, pp. 45–71. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, London: Chicago UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbach, E. 1993. Mental Representation and Consciousness: Towards a Phenomenological Theory of Representation and Reference. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer. (Contributions to Phenomenology, 14).

  • Pinker, S. [1997] 1999. How the Mind Works. London: Penguin.

  • Reisberg, D. 1992. Preface. In: D. Reisberg (ed), Auditory Imagery, pp. vii–ix. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Spiegelberg, H. 1975. Doing Phenomenology: Essays on and in Phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff. (Phaenomenologica, 63).

  • Vieregge, W. 1987. Basic aspects of phonetic segmental transcription. In: A. Almeida, A. Braun (eds), Probleme der Phonetischen Transkription, pp. 5–47. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beihefte, 54).

  • Vieregge, W. 1992. Das Konzept der auditiven Aufmerksamkeitsspanne beim analytischen Hören. In: Phonetik und Dialektologie. Joachim Göschel zum 60. Geburtstag. Ed. H. J. Dingeldein, pp. 54–75. Marburg: Universitätsbibliothek.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Schmicking.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmicking, D. Is there imaginary loudness? Reconsidering phenomenological method. Phenom Cogn Sci 4, 169–182 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-7597-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-7597-7

Key words

Navigation