51
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correspondences

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries”

Pages W1-W3 | Published online: 27 Nov 2023
 
This article refers to:
Public Engagement with Human Germline Editing Requires Specification
Inclusion by Invitation Only? Public Engagement beyond Deliberation in the Governance of Innovative Biotechnology
Varieties of Citizen Engagement in Deliberation about Biotechnology
What Kind of Popular Participation Does Bioethics Need? Clarifying the Ends of Public Engagement through Randomly Selected Mini-Publics
Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries
In Defense of Expert Knowledge in Bioethical Discussions on Human Genome Editing
It Takes Two to Tango: Fostering Engagement Within Citizen Juries
Not All Publics Are the Same—A Note on Power, Diversity, and Lived Expertise in Public Deliberation

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.