Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifiers in Comparatives: A Semantics of Degree Based on Intervals

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sentence Irving was closer to me than he was to most of the others contains a quantifier, most of the other, in the scope a comparative. The first part of this paper explains the challenges presented by such cases to existing approaches to the semantics of the comparative. The second part presents a new analysis of comparatives based on intervals rather than points on a scale. This innovation is analogized to the move from moments to intervals in tense semantics. The remainder of the paper is concerned with an interval-based semantics of degree in relation to issues other than the comparative proper. The paper begins with a discussion of the role negative polarity has played in studies on the semantics of comparatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bennett, M.: 1977, 'A Guide to the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English', Logique et Analyse 80, 491-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. and B. Partee: 1972, 'Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English', Systems Development Corporation, Santa Monica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M.: 1987, 'The Semantics of Gradation', in M. Bierwisch and E. Lang (eds.), Dimensional Adjectives, pp. 71-262. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J.: 1976, 'The Semantics of Degree', in B. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, pp. 261-292. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J.: 1985, Adverbial Modification. Interval Semantics and Its Rivals (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 28). Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenkranz, J.: 1973, 'Sometimes, Or = And', Linguistic Inquiry 4(2), 241-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G.: 1975, 'Polarity and the Scale Principle', Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 188-199. CLS, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G.: 1978, 'Implication Reversal in Natural Language', in F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Language, pp. 289-301. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1985, 'Notes on Comparatives and Related Matters', ms., University of Texas at Austin.

  • Hellan, L.: 1981, Towards an Integrated Analysis of Comparatives. Narr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heycock, C. and A. Kroch: 1999, 'Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level', Linguistic Inquiry 30(3), 365-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, F. R.: 1973, The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English, PhD dissertation, MIT. Published by Garland, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1983, 'Negative Polarity and the Comparative', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(3), 403-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 2000, 'Negative Polarity Items: Triggering, Scope and C-Command', in L. Horn and Y. Kato (eds.), Negation and Polarity. Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives, pp. 123-154. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, N.: 1987, On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Kennedy, C.: 1997, Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability, PhD dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.

  • Kennedy, C.: 1999, 'Local Dependencies in Comparative Deletion', K. Shahin, S. Blake, and E.-S. Kim (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 17, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C.: 2001, 'Polar Opposition and the Ontology of Degrees', Linguistics and Philosophy 24(1), 33-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E.: 1980, 'A Semantics for Positive and Comparative Adjectives', Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 1-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E.: 1982, 'The Interpretation of Adjectival Comparatives', Journal of Linguistics 18, 113-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, E.: 1991, 'Comparatives', in A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik/Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 673-691. De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W. A.: 1979, Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Ladusaw, W. A.: 1980, 'On the Notion of Affective in the Analysis of Negative Polarity Items', Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1971, 'On Generative Semantics', in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, pp. 232-296. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R.: 1988, 'Scope and Comparatives', Linguistics and Philosophy 11(1), 1-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J.-Y. and M. Pinkal: 1992, 'Comparatives and Nested Quantification', in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 329-347. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.

  • Linebarger, M.: 1987, 'Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation', Linguistics and Philosophy 10(3), 325-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G.: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plural and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach', in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 303-323. De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell-Ginet, S.: 1973, Comparative Constructions in English: A Syntactic and Semantic Analysis, PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.

  • Meier, C.: to appear, 'The Meaning of Too, Enough, and So... That', Natural Language Semantics.

  • Moltmann, F.: 1992, Coordination and Comparatives, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Nerbonne, J.: 1995, 'Nominal Comparatives and Generalized Quantifiers', Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4(4), 273-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, H.: 1995, Maximality in the Semantics of WH-Constructions, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Russell, B.: 1905, 'On Denoting', Mind 14, 479-493. Reprinted in R. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge, Allen & Unwin, London, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Valencia, V.: 1994, 'Polarity, Predicates, and Monotonicity,' ms., Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

  • Seuren, P.: 1984, 'The Comparative Revisited', Journal of Semantics 3, 109-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvy, R.: 1980, 'A More General Theory of Definite Description', Philosophical Review 89, 607-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultan, R.: 1972, 'Some Features of Basic Comparative Constructions', Stanford Working Papers on Language Universals 9, 117-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vainikka, A.: 1987, 'Why Can Or Mean And or Or?', in J. Blevins and A. Vainikka (eds.), Issues in Semantics (UMOP 12), pp. 148-186. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • van Benthem, J.: 1983, The Logic of Time, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, A.: 1984, 'Comparing Theories of Comparison', Journal of Semantics 3, 1-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. C.: 1972, 'Attributives and Their Modifiers', Nous 6(4), 310-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K.: 1998, 'Comparatives and Quantifier Scope', handout for colloquium given at the University of California, Irvine.

  • Zepter, A.: 2001, 'How to Be Universal When You Are Existential. Negative Polarity Items in the Comparative: Entailment along a Scale', ms., Rutgers University.

  • Zimmermann, T. E.: 2000, 'Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility', Natural Language Semantics 8, 255-290.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwarzchild, R., Wilkinson, K. Quantifiers in Comparatives: A Semantics of Degree Based on Intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10, 1–41 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015545424775

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015545424775

Keywords

Navigation