Skip to main content
Log in

The Concept of Morphological Polarity and its Implication on the Concept of the Essential Organs and on the Concept of the Organisation Type of the Dicotyledonous Plant

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dicotyledons are polarly organised in several ways. In plant morphology polarity, a principle allowing comparison of different plant structures has until yet not been studied. A division** of the vegetative plant in shoot and root as polar structures leads to the distinction of four instead of three basic organs: leaf, shoot axis, root axis and root cap together with the root hairs. The flower is also polarly organised, its poles are formed by the carpels and the stamens. The foliage leaves are also polarly organised which is reflected by the morphological relationship of foliage leaf, stamen and carpel. The stamen uses the hypophyll*** as base of construction and the carpel uses the epiphyll**** as base of construction. Hypophyll and epiphyll are the two poles of the foliage leaf. Root and shoot, the polar entities of the vegetative plant and stamen and carpel, the polar entities of the generative plant, are morphologically correlated. Stamen and carpel can be understood as a combination of the basic organs of vegetative and generative parts of the plant. The basic organs of the generative plant are pollen grain and embryo sack with their gametophytes. The quantitative comparison of variable proportions is supplemented by a qualitative comparison of polarities. The result is, that the organisation type of the dicotyledons can yet be understood as constituted of morphological related parts.

* in german Grundorgane

** in german: Gliederung

*** in german: Unterblat

**** in german: Oberblatt

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Cronquist, A. (1988). The evolution and classification of flowering plants. New York, New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F. (1993). Dritte Abteilung: Spermatophyta, Samenpflanzen. In: Strasburger Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. 33rd edition. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froebe, H.A. and R. Classen-Bockhoff (1994). Das trialektische Typuskonzept der botanischen Morphologie. Senckenberg-Buch 70: 143–167. Frankfurt am Main, Waldemar Kramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froebe, H.A. (1982). Homologiekriterien oder Argumentationsverfahren? Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 95: 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethe, J.W. (1975). Schriften zur Botanik und Wissenschaftslehre. München, DTV Gesamtausgabe 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, W. (1970). Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Angiospermenblätter. Bot. Jb. 90: 297–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, W. (1984). Morphological aspects of leaf development in ferns and angiosperms. In: R.A. White and W.C. Dickinson, eds. Contemporary Problems in Plant Anatomy, 301–349. Orlando, Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. (1907). Goethes Metamorphose der Pflanzen. Giessen, Alfred Töpelmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiepko, P. (1965). Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae Teil 1 & 2. Bot. Jb. 84: 350–426 & 427–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz, E.M. et al. (1991). Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutishauser, R. and R. Sattler (1985). Complementary and heuristic value of contrasting models in structural botany. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107: 415–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (1882). Vorlesungen über Pflanzenphysiologie. Leipzig, Wilhelm Engelmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitte, P. (1993). Einleitung und Morphologie. In: Strasburger Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. 33rd edition. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. (1991). Evolutionary Trends in Flowering Plants. New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbert, P.B. et al. (1995). The REVOLUTA gene is necessary for apical meristem development and for limiting cell-divisions in the leaves and stems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 121: 2723–2735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W. (1926). Goethes morphologische Schriften. Jena, Eugen Diederichs Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W. (1967). Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanze. Teil 1. Nachdruck. Königstein/T, Otto Koeltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W. (1973). Praktische Einführung in die Pflanzenmorphologie, der vegetative Aufbau. Nachdruck, Königstein/T, Otto Koeltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F. (1981). Morphologie der Blüten under der Blütenstände. Stuttgart, Verlag Eugen Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schilperoord-Jarke, P. The Concept of Morphological Polarity and its Implication on the Concept of the Essential Organs and on the Concept of the Organisation Type of the Dicotyledonous Plant. Acta Biotheor 45, 51–63 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000211306571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000211306571

Keywords

Navigation