Abstract
Dicotyledons are polarly organised in several ways. In plant morphology polarity, a principle allowing comparison of different plant structures has until yet not been studied. A division** of the vegetative plant in shoot and root as polar structures leads to the distinction of four instead of three basic organs: leaf, shoot axis, root axis and root cap together with the root hairs. The flower is also polarly organised, its poles are formed by the carpels and the stamens. The foliage leaves are also polarly organised which is reflected by the morphological relationship of foliage leaf, stamen and carpel. The stamen uses the hypophyll*** as base of construction and the carpel uses the epiphyll**** as base of construction. Hypophyll and epiphyll are the two poles of the foliage leaf. Root and shoot, the polar entities of the vegetative plant and stamen and carpel, the polar entities of the generative plant, are morphologically correlated. Stamen and carpel can be understood as a combination of the basic organs of vegetative and generative parts of the plant. The basic organs of the generative plant are pollen grain and embryo sack with their gametophytes. The quantitative comparison of variable proportions is supplemented by a qualitative comparison of polarities. The result is, that the organisation type of the dicotyledons can yet be understood as constituted of morphological related parts.
* in german Grundorgane
** in german: Gliederung
*** in german: Unterblat
**** in german: Oberblatt
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Cronquist, A. (1988). The evolution and classification of flowering plants. New York, New York Botanical Garden.
Ehrendorfer, F. (1993). Dritte Abteilung: Spermatophyta, Samenpflanzen. In: Strasburger Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. 33rd edition. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer.
Froebe, H.A. and R. Classen-Bockhoff (1994). Das trialektische Typuskonzept der botanischen Morphologie. Senckenberg-Buch 70: 143–167. Frankfurt am Main, Waldemar Kramer.
Froebe, H.A. (1982). Homologiekriterien oder Argumentationsverfahren? Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 95: 19–34.
Goethe, J.W. (1975). Schriften zur Botanik und Wissenschaftslehre. München, DTV Gesamtausgabe 39.
Hagemann, W. (1970). Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Angiospermenblätter. Bot. Jb. 90: 297–413.
Hagemann, W. (1984). Morphological aspects of leaf development in ferns and angiosperms. In: R.A. White and W.C. Dickinson, eds. Contemporary Problems in Plant Anatomy, 301–349. Orlando, Acad. Press.
Hansen, A. (1907). Goethes Metamorphose der Pflanzen. Giessen, Alfred Töpelmann Verlag.
Hiepko, P. (1965). Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae Teil 1 & 2. Bot. Jb. 84: 350–426 & 427–508.
Meyerowitz, E.M. et al. (1991). Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112: 1–20.
Rutishauser, R. and R. Sattler (1985). Complementary and heuristic value of contrasting models in structural botany. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107: 415–455.
Sachs, J. (1882). Vorlesungen über Pflanzenphysiologie. Leipzig, Wilhelm Engelmann Verlag.
Sitte, P. (1993). Einleitung und Morphologie. In: Strasburger Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. 33rd edition. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer.
Takhtajan, A. (1991). Evolutionary Trends in Flowering Plants. New York, Columbia University Press.
Talbert, P.B. et al. (1995). The REVOLUTA gene is necessary for apical meristem development and for limiting cell-divisions in the leaves and stems of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 121: 2723–2735.
Troll, W. (1926). Goethes morphologische Schriften. Jena, Eugen Diederichs Verlag.
Troll, W. (1967). Vergleichende Morphologie der höheren Pflanze. Teil 1. Nachdruck. Königstein/T, Otto Koeltz.
Troll, W. (1973). Praktische Einführung in die Pflanzenmorphologie, der vegetative Aufbau. Nachdruck, Königstein/T, Otto Koeltz.
Weberling, F. (1981). Morphologie der Blüten under der Blütenstände. Stuttgart, Verlag Eugen Ulmer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schilperoord-Jarke, P. The Concept of Morphological Polarity and its Implication on the Concept of the Essential Organs and on the Concept of the Organisation Type of the Dicotyledonous Plant. Acta Biotheor 45, 51–63 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000211306571
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000211306571