Abstract
In my paper I will give an account of the calculus of games of chance as presented in the correspondence between Pascal and Fermat as well as in Huygens’ little tract De ratiociniis in ludo aleae. Such an account refers especially to the article of Donald Gillies “An empiricist philosophy of mathematics and its implications for the history of mathematics” and to his claim that empirical observations triggered the early development of probability theory as visible in the correspondence between Pascal and Fermat from 1654. Gillies is concerned with such empirical observations because they confirm in his opinion his empiricist philosophy of mathematics. Gillies’ empiricist approach suggests that “some pattern of development which is well-established as characteristic of the growth of theoretical natural science in general” is likely to be found in the history of mathematics. He contends that if every such pattern found in theoretical natural science can also be found somewhere in the development of mathematics then “this would tend to confirm our empiricist view of mathematics” and if, “on the contrary, some patterns of development which are definitely characteristic of theoretical natural science are not to be found in the history of mathematics, this would tend to undermine the present philosophy of mathematics.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arbuthnot, John (presumed to be Anonymous). (1692). Of the laws of chance. London.
Daston, Lorraine. (1988). Classical Probability Theory in the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Dauben, Joseph W. (1981). Mathematical Perspectives, Essays on Mathematics and Its Historical Development. New York: Academic Press.
David, F. N. (1962). Gods, Games, and Gambling. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
Folkerts, M. and U. Lindgren. (Eds.). (1985). Mathemata. Festschrift für Helmuth Gericke. Stuttgart: Steiner.
Graunt, John. (1662). Natural and political observations mentioned in a following index ,and made upon the bills of mortality. London.
Halley, Edmond. (1696). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. No. 196: 596–610.
Hacking, Ian. (1975). The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, Cynthia. (Ed.). (1988). Mathematics from Manuscript to Print 1300–1600. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huygens, Christiaan. (1888). Oeuvres Complètes de Christiaan Huygens. Den Haag.
Huygens, Christiaan. (1656). Letter to van Schooten, May 6, 1656. in (Huygens 1888, Vol. I, 413–6).
Huygens, Christiaan. (1657a). De ratiociniis in ludo aleae.
Huygens, Christiaan. (1657b). Letter to van Schooten, April 27, 1657. In (Huygens 1657a, 519).
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1978). Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity 1894–1912. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, Imre and Alan Musgrave. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mackenzie, Donald A. (1981). Statistics in Britain 1865–1930: The social construction of scientific knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Masterman, Margaret. (1970). “The nature of a paradigm.” in (Lakatos and Musgrave 1970, 59–89).
Montmort, (1708/1713). Essay d’Analyse sur les Jeux de Hazard.
Pacioli, Luca. (1494/1523). Summa de Arithmetica Geometria Proportioni et Proportionalita. 2nd edition. Venice: Toscolano.
Schneider, Ivo. (1980). “The contributions of Christiaan Huygens to the development of a calculus of probabilities.” Janus. Volume 67: 269–79.
Schneider, Ivo. (1981). “Leibniz on the Probable.” in (Dauben 1981, 201–19).
Schneider, Ivo. (1984). The role of Leibniz and of Jakob Bernoulli for the development of probability theory. LLULL. Boletin de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias. Vol. 7: 68–89.
Schneider, Ivo. (1985). “Luca Pacioli und das Teilungsproblem: Hintergrund und Lösungsversuche.” in (Folkerts and Lindgren 1985, 237–46).
Schneider, Ivo. (1988). “The marketplace and games of chance in the 15th and 16th centuries.” in (Hay 1988, 220–35).
Schneider, Ivo. (1996). “Christiaan Huygens’ non-probabilistic approach to a calculus of games of chance.” De zeventiende eeuw. Vol. 12: 171–85.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, I. (2000). The Mathematization of Chance in the Middle of the 17th Century. In: Grosholz, E., Breger, H. (eds) The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Synthese Library, vol 289. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9558-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5391-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9558-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive