Skip to main content
Log in

Troubles with Truth-making: Necessitation and Projection

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main question of this paper is how to understand the notion of a truth-maker. In section 1, I show that the identification of truth-making with necessitation cannot capture the pretheoretic understanding of notions such as ‘x makes something true’. In section 2, I examine Barry Smith’s reaction to this problem: he defines truth-making as the combination of necessitation and projection. I focus on the formal part of Smith’s account, which is shown to yield undesired results. However, in section 3, I present an alternative account of projection, which fares better and can fruitfully be employed to circumvent the problems raised in section 1. Unfortunately, the account still has to face some troublemakers, as I show in the final section. I conclude, therefore, with a pessimistic view on the project of defining truth-making via necessitation and projection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • G. Evans (1982) Varieties of Reference Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Fine (1995) ArticleTitle‘Ontological Dependence’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 269–290

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fox (1987) ArticleTitle‘Truthmaker’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 188–207 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00048408712342871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Gregory (2001) ArticleTitle‘Smith on Truthmakers’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 422–427

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim (1976) ‘Events as Property Exemplifications’ J. Kim (Eds) Supervenience and Mind Cambridge University Press Cambridge 33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Mulligan P. Simons B. Smith (1984) ArticleTitle‘Truth-makers’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 287–320 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2107686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Rayo S. Yablo (2001) ArticleTitle‘Nominalism Through De-Nominalization’ Noûs 35 74–92

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Restall (1996) ArticleTitle‘Truthmakers, Entailment and Necessity’ Australasian Journal for Philosophy 74 331–340

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (2000) ArticleTitle‘What is the Problem of Universals?’ Mind 109 255–273 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/109.434.255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnieder, B.: (forthcoming) ‘Truth-making Without Truth-makers’, forthcoming in Synthese

  • B. Smith (1999) ArticleTitle‘Truthmaker Realism’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 274–291 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00048409912349041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Smith (2002) ArticleTitle‘Truthmaker Realism: Response to Gregory’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 231–234

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Williamson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Truthmakers and the Converse Barcan Formula’ Dialectica 53 253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Williamson (2000) Knowledge and Its Limits OUP Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Schnieder.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted 22 September 2004 Final version received 28 September 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnieder, B. Troubles with Truth-making: Necessitation and Projection. Erkenntnis 64, 61–74 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3566-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-005-3566-3

Keywords

Navigation