Abstract
This paper deals primarily with the Doctrine of Method (DM) of Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue. First, I present an overview of the DM (1.1) and an explanation of how it is possible to teach virtue (1.2). Second, I address the following issues: Why is a DM necessary at all (2.1)? How does the DM relate to what Kant calls casuistry (2.2)? I will argue that wide duties have two essential characteristics: They command the right kind of moral motivation in terms of a moral maxim, and they allow for latitude. The fact that wide duties command the right kind of motivation leads to the DM; the latitude of wide duties, however, leads to casuistry. To unfold this interpretation, it must also be shown that both imperfect and perfect duties are wide duties.
References
Bacin, S. 2002. “Sul rapporto tra riflessione e vita morale in Kant: Le dottrine del metodo nella filosofia pratica.” Studi Kantiani 15: 65–91.Search in Google Scholar
Bacin, S. 2010. “The Meaning of the Critique of Practical Reason for Moral Beings: The Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide, edited by A. Reath, and J. Timmermann, 197–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770869.011Search in Google Scholar
Baron, M. W. 1997. “Kantian Ethics.” In Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate, edited by M. W. Baron, P. Pettit, and M. Slote, 3–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baron, M. W. 1999. Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501720895Search in Google Scholar
Baxley, A. M. 2010. Kant’s Theory of Virtue. The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, L. W. 1966. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Denis, L. 2006. “Kant’s Conception of Virtue.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by P. Guyer, 505–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL052182303X.016Search in Google Scholar
Denis, L., ed. 2010. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dörflinger, B. 2013. “Ethische Methodenlehre: Didaktik und Asketik.” In Kant’s ‘Tugendlehre.‘ A Comprehensive Commentary, edited by A. Trampota, O. Sensen, and J. Timmermann, 383–410. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229875.383Search in Google Scholar
Engstrom, S. 2002. “The Inner Freedom of Virtue.” In Kant’s ‘Metaphysics of Morals’. Interpretative Essays, edited by M. Timmons, 289–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198250098.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Esser, A. M. 2004. Eine Ethik für Endliche. Kants Tugendlehre in der Gegenwart. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Search in Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. S. 2019. “On Virtues of Love and Wide Ethical Duties.” Kantian Review 24 (3): 415–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415419000190.Search in Google Scholar
Forkl, M. 2001. Kants System der Tugendpflichten. Eine Begleitschrift zu den ‘Metaphysischen Anfangsgründen der Tugendlehre‘. Frankfurt: Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Fuhr, T. 2000. “The Missing Voice of the Student: Kant’s Monologue on Morality.” Philosophy of Education 8: 103–5.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2000. Kant on Law, Freedom, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173339Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2012. “Examples of Moral Possibility.” In Kant and Education. Interpretations and Commentary, edited by K. Roth, and C. W. Surprenant, 124–38. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Hespe, F. 2019. “Wie Tugend gelernt und eingeübt werden kann (§§49–53).” In Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Klassiker Auslegen 58, edited by O. Höffe, 211–28. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783050094830-015Search in Google Scholar
Hill, Th. E.Jr. 2008. “Kantian Virtue and ‘Virtue Ethics.” In Kant’s Ethics of Virtue, edited by M. Betzler, 29–59. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110209655.29Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, J. S. 2006. “The Education of the Categorical Imperative.” Studies in Philosophical Education 25 (5): 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-006-9006-2.Search in Google Scholar
Jost, L., and J. Wuerth, eds. 2011. Perfecting Virtue. New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511973789Search in Google Scholar
Kersting, W. 1982. “Das starke Gesetz der Schuldigkeit und das schwächere der Gütigkeit, Kant und die Pflichtenlehre des 18. Jahrhunderts.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (2): 184–220.Search in Google Scholar
Koch, L. 2003. Kants ethische Didaktik. Würzburg: Ergon.Search in Google Scholar
Louden, R. B. 1986. “Kant’s Virtue Ethics.” Philosophy 61 (238): 473–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100061246.Search in Google Scholar
Louden, R. B. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics. From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195130416.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Malibabo, B. 2000. Kants Konzept einer kritischen Metaphysik der Sitten. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar
Moran, K. A. 2009. “Can Kant Have an Account of Moral Education?” Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4): 471–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2009.00721.x.Search in Google Scholar
Morris, C. 2020. “Kant’s Moral Catechism Revisited.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 55 (6): 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12497.Search in Google Scholar
Munzel, G. F. 2002. “Doctrine of Method’ and ‘Closing.” In Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Klassiker Auslegen 26, edited by O. Höffe, 177–89. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050056180.177Search in Google Scholar
Munzel, G. F. 2003. “Kant on Moral Education, or ‘Enlightment’ and the Liberal Arts.” The Review of Metaphysics 57 (1): 43–73.Search in Google Scholar
Okshevsky, W. 2000. “Kant’s Catechism for Moral Education: From Particularity Through Universality to Morality.” Philosophy of Education: 94–102.Search in Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2010. “Seelengymnastik: Geleitwort zum Kontext der Verzichtsaskese in der antiken Philosophie.” In Askese und Identität in Spätantike, Mittelalter und Früher Neuzeit, edited by W. Röcke, and J. Weitbrecht, 9–16. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110228373.0.9Search in Google Scholar
Roth, K., and C. W. Surprenant, eds. 2012. Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203348086Search in Google Scholar
Rühl, U. F. H. 2021. “Methodenlehre und kasuistische Fragen in Kants Rechts-und Tugendlehre.” In Zwischen Rechten und Pflichten – Kants ‘Metaphysik der Sitten‘, edited by J. C. Merle, and C. von Villiez, 285–97. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110537215-017Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, E., and D. Schönecker. 2019. “Ethische Elementarlehre §§ 5-8.” In Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre. Klassiker Auslegen, edited by O. Höffe, 101–119. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783050094830-009Search in Google Scholar
Schüssler, R. 2012. “Kant und die Kasuistik: Fragen der Tugendlehre.” Kant-Studien 103 (1): 70–95.10.1515/kant-2012-0004Search in Google Scholar
Schwartz, M. 2013. ”Erziehung zur Freiheit. Kants Methodenlehren in KpV und TL als Antwort auf die Frage nach der Gründung eines (moralischen) Charakters“, Theologie und Philosophie 88 (1): 26–46.Search in Google Scholar
Sherman, N. 1997. Making a Necessity of Virtue. Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624865Search in Google Scholar
Sticker, M., and D. Bakhurst, eds. 2021. “Special Issue: Kant on Education and Improvement.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 55 (6): 905–1158.10.1111/1467-9752.12631Search in Google Scholar
Stratton Lake, P. 2008. “Being Virtuous and the Virtues: Two Aspects of Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue’.” In Kant’s Ethics of Virtue, edited by M. Betzler, 101–21. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110209655.101Search in Google Scholar
Surprenant, C. W. 2012. “Kant’s Contribution to Moral Education.” In Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary, edited by K. Roth, and C. W. Surprenant, 1–11. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Timmermann, J. 2005. “Good but Not Required? Assessing the Demands of Kantian Ethics.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (1): 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740468105052581.Search in Google Scholar
Timmons, M., ed. 2001. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Timmons, M. 2021. Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue. A Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190939229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Zartmann, H. 1909. Kants ethische Methodenlehren. Berlin: Schäfer.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
