Abstract
This paper presents a case study of the English noun amount, a word that ostensibly relies on measurement in its semantics, yet stands apart from other quantizing nouns on the basis of its existential interpretation. John ate the amount of apples that Bill ate does not mean John and Bill ate the same apples, but rather that they each ate apples in the same quantity. Amount makes reference to abstract representations of measurement, that is, to degrees. Its existential interpretation evidences the fact that degrees contain information about the objects that instantiate them. Outside the domain of nominal measurement, the noun kind exhibits behavior strikingly similar to that of amount; both yield an existential interpretation. This observation motivates re-conceiving of degrees as nominalized quantity-uniform properties—the same sort of entity as kinds. Thus, the semantic machinery handling kinds also handles degrees: as nominalized properties, degrees are instantiated by objects that hold the corresponding property; when instantiated by real-world objects, degrees (and kinds) deliver the existential interpretation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åfarli T. (1994) A promotion analysis of restrictive relative clauses. Linguistic Review 11(1): 81–100
Anderson C., Morzycki M. (2015) Degrees as kinds. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(3): 791–828
Brasoveanu, A. (2009). Measure noun polysemy and monotonicity: Evidence from Romanian pseudopartitives. In A. Schardl, M. Walkow, & M. Abdurranhman (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 38 (pp. 139–150).
Carlson G. (1977a) Amount relatives. Language 53(3): 520–542
Carlson, G. (1977b). Reference to kinds in English. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Cartwright H. M. (1970) Quantities. The Philosophical Review 79(1): 25–42
Chierchia G. (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405
Chomsky, N. (1977). On Wh-movement. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). New York: Academic Press.
Citko B. (2011a) Small clauses. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(10): 748–763
Citko B. (2011b) Symmetry in syntax: Merge, move and labels. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cresswell, M. J. (1976). The semantics of degree. In B. H. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar (pp. 261–292). New York: Academic Press.
Davies, M. (2010–). The corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/.
Dayal, V. (1992). The singular-plural distinction in Hindi generics. In C. Barker & D. Dowty (Eds.), Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 2. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 40, pp. 39–58).
Dayal V. (2004) Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 393–450
Donati C., Cecchetto C. (2011) Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures. Linguistic Inquiry 42(4): 519–560
Grimm, S. (2012). Number and individuation. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Grosu A., Landman F. (1998) Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6: 125–170
Heim, I. (1985). Notes on comparatives and related matters. Unpublished MS, University of Texas, Austin.
Heim, I. (1987). Where does the definiteness restriction apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In E. J. Reuland & A. G. B. ter Meulen (Eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness (pp. 21–42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne R. (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge
Kennedy C. (1999) Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland, New York
Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1–45
Kennedy C., McNally L. (2005) Scale structure, degree modification and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381
Lima, S. (2014). The grammar of individuation and counting. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: de Gruyter.
McNally, L. (2016). Modification. In M. Aloni & P. Dekker (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of formal semantics (pp. 442–466). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milsark, G. (1974). Existential sentences in English. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Montague, R. (1974). English as a formal language. In R. H. Thomason (Ed.), Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague (pp. 188–226). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Moro A. (2000) Dynamic antisymmetry. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge
Partee B. (1975) Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 203–300
Partee, B. H. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris.
Rothstein, S. (2013). A Fregean semantics for number words. In M. Aloni, M. Franke, & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 179–186).
Russell, B. (1938). The principles of mathematics (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Safir, K. (1982). Syntactic chains and the definiteness effect. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sauerland, U. (1998). The meaning of chains. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Schwarzschild R. (2006) The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 8(1): 67–110
Schwarzschild R. (2008) The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(2): 308–331
Scontras, G. (2014). The semantics of measurement. PhD thesis, Harvard University.
Seuren, P. A. M. (1973). The comparative. In F. Kiefer & N. Ruwet (Eds.), Generative grammar in Europe (pp. 528–564). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Sharvy R. (1980) A more general theory of definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 89(4): 607–624
Solt S. (2015) Measurement scales in natural language. Language and Linguistics Compass 9: 14–32
Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of phrase structure. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
von Stechow A. (1984) Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77
Wilkinson, K. (1995). The semantics of the common noun kind. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 383–397). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zamparelli, R. (1998). A theory of kinds, partitives and of/z possessives. In A. Alexiadou & C. Wilder (Eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase (pp. 259–301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scontras, G. A new kind of degree. Linguist and Philos 40, 165–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9200-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9200-9