Abstract
In 2001, it was announced thattransgenic DNA had introgressed intotraditional strains of maize in Mexico. Acontroversy erupted and raged throughout 2001and 2002. This episode represents an acutebreakdown in scientific discourse. Given thestakes in the genetically modified organismdebate, a breakdown in scientific discourse isalarming. The following inquiry looks into thecauses of this breakdown. Ultimately, it willbe argued that the underlying problem is thecurrent institutional structure of science,particularly in the United States. If thediagnosis is correct, then the proper course oftreatment is to pursue a program ofinstitutional reconstruction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
AgBioWorld, “Joint Statement in Support of Scientific Discourse in Mexican GM Maize Scandal,” http://www.agribioworld.org/jointstatement.html (2002) (accessed July 19, 2002).
Baier, A., Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).
Bailey, R., “Environmentalist Biofraud? A New Report Challenges Research Published in Respected Journal,” Reason, February 12, 2002, http://reason.com/rb/rbo21202. shtml.
Barber, B., The Logic and Limits of Trust (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 1983).
Campbell, J., Understanding John Dewey (Open Court, Chicago, 1996), pp. 184–193.
Charles, D., Lords of the Harvest (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA, 2001).
Christou, P., “No Credible Scientific Evidence is Presented to Support Claims that Transgenic DNA was Introgressed into Traditional Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico,” Transgenic Research 11 (2002), iii–v.
Dewey, J., Human Nature and Conflict, pp. 207, 228; in John Dewey: The Middle Works: 1899–1924, J. A. Boydston (ed.), vol. 14 (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1976–1983).
Dewey, J., Liberalism and Social Action, p. 56; in John Dewey: The Later Works: 1925–1953, J. A. Boydston (ed.), vol. 11 (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1981–1990).
Dewey, J., Freedom and Culture, p. 94; in JohnDewey: The Later Works: 1925–1953. J.A. Boydston (ed.), vol. 13 (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1981–1990).
Editor, “Comment,” Nature 416 (2002), 601.
Editor, Nature 420(2002), 730–731.
Enserink, M., “Institute Copes with Genetic Hot Potato,” Science 281(5380) (1998), 1124–1125.
Enserink, M., “The Lancet Scolded Over the Pusztai Paper,” Science 286(5440) (1999), 696.
Ewen, S. and A. Pusztai, “Effects of Diets Containing Genetically Modified Potatoes Expressing Galanthus Nivalis Lectin on Rats Small Intestine,” Lancet 354(9187) (1999), 1353–1354.
Food First, “Joint Statement on the Mexican GM Maize Scandal” (2002), http://www. foodfirst.org/progs/global/ge/jpintstatement2002.html (accessed July 19, 2002).
Joint Research (JRC) Report, http://www.jrc.es/gmoreview.pdf (2003) (accessed March 15, 2003).
Kaplinsky, N., D. Braun, D. Lisch, A. Hay, S. Hake, and M. Freeling, “Correspondence,” Nature 416(2002), 601–602.
Krimsky, S., “The Profit of Scientific Discovery and Its Normative Implications,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 75(15) (1999), 15–39.
Kuhn, T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970).
Mann, R., “Has GM Corn 'Invaded' Mexico?,” Science Magazine 295 (5560)(2002), 617–1619.
McGee, G., “Pragmatic Method in Bioethics,” in G. McGee (ed.), Pragmatic Bioethics (Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, 1999).
Metz, M. and J. Fütterer, “Correspondence,” Nature 416(2002), 600–601.
Metz, M. and J. Fütterer, “Correspondence,” Nature 417(2002), 897–898.
Otto, M. J., “Critics Question Private Funding: Students, Others Wary of Corporate Influence in Education,” The Daily Californian (1998), http://archive.dailycal.org/archive/ 98/11/30/university.html.
Palevitz, B. A., –Corn Goes Pop, then Kaboom: Nature Regrets Publishing a Pager onTransgene Contamination in Mexico,— The Scientists (2002), http://www.the-scientist.com/yr2002/apr/palevitz_p18_020429.html.
Pearce, F., “The Great Mexican Maize Scandal,” New Scientist, 15 June 2002, pp. 14–16.
Press, E. and J. Washburn, “The Kept University, Part I,” The Atlantic Monthly March (2000), http:www.theatlantic.com/issues/2000/03/press.htm.
Quist, D. and I. Chapela, “Transgenic DNA Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca Mexico,” Nature 414(2002), 541–543.
Quist, D. and I. Chapela, “Correspondence,” Nature 416 (2002), 602.
The Royal Society, “Review of Data on Possible Toxicity of GE Potatoes” (1999), http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk (accessed August, 8 2002).
Suarez, A., V. M. Benard, N. D. Tsutsui, T. A. Blackledge, K. Copren, E. M. Sarnat, A. L. Wild, W. M. Getz, P. T. Starks, K. Will, P. J. Palsbøll, M. E. Hauber, C. Moritz, and A. D. Richman, “Correspondence,” Nature 417 (2002), 897.
Thompson, P., Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective (Blackie Academic and Professional Press, London, 1994), pp. 216–221.
Worthy, K., R. C. Strohman, and P. R. Billings, “Correspondence,” Nature 417 (2002), 897.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, D. Science and the Consequences of Mistruct: Lessons from Recent GM Controversies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 569–582 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000004963.59665.3d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000004963.59665.3d