Abstract
Research is now an increasingly heterogeneous activity involving an expanded range of new actors and stake-holders and employing an eclectic range of epistemologies and methodologies. The emergence of these new research paradigms — and, in particular, of so-called ‘Mode 2’ knowledge production that is highly contextualised and socially distributed — raises new and challenging ethical issues and also important questions about the autonomy of science and the social responsibilities of scientists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ziman, J. (2000) Real Science: what it is, and what it means, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L., eds. (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences make Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Hicks, D. and Katz, J.S. (1996) Science policy for a highly collaborative science system, Science and Public Policy 23: 39–44.
Scott, P. (2000) The Impact of the Research Assessment Exercise on the Quality of British Science and Scholarship, Anglistik, 2000, 1, 129143.
Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, P. The ethical implications of the new research paradigm. SCI ENG ETHICS 9, 73–84 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0021-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0021-1