Skip to main content
Log in

AIDS, science and the totem

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Fitzpatrick, M. and Milligan, D. (1987).The Truth about the AIDS Panic, Junius Publications Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart, G. T. (1994). Scientific surveillance and the control of AIDS: a call for open debate.Health Care Analysis 2(4), 279–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caton, H. (1994). Alternative models of the AIDS epidemic.Health Care Analysis 2(4), 351–355.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schüklenk, U. (1994). HIV and the causes of AIDS—a flat earther's view.PWALIVE Magazine,5(3), 7–9, Minneapolis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ho, D. D., Yunzhen, C., Tuofu, Z.et al. (1993). Idiopathic CD4+ T-Lymphocytopenia-immuno-deficiency without evidence of HIV infection.New England Journal of Medicine 328(6), 380–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Plumridge, E. and Chetwynd, J. (1994). AIDS policy response in New Zealand: consensus in crisis.Health Care Analysis 2(4), 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pascal, L. (1991). What happens when science goes bad.Science and Technology Working Paper No.9, Department of Science and Technology Studies, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koestler, A. (1979).Janus: A Summing Up, Pan Books Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maclean, P. D. (1962). Quoted in8.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seedhouse, D. AIDS, science and the totem. Health Care Anal 2, 273–278 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251072

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251072

Navigation