Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Well-Being and Fairness

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 December 2006

Abstract

The article explores the interaction of two, potentially clashing, considerations, each reflecting a different conception of fairness concerning the resolution of interpersonal conflicts. According to the Equal Chance Principle, the harm for each person should be minimized in a significant and (roughly) equal degree; when this is impossible, each person should be accorded the highest possible equal chance to avoid the harm. According to the Importance Principle, the danger to the person who would otherwise suffer the more serious harm should be prevented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Re’em Segev.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-8498-5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segev, R. Well-Being and Fairness. Philos Stud 131, 369–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7484-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7484-z

Keywords

Navigation