Abstract
The author thematizes the operation of the political market of attention that is propelled by the willingness of citizens to credit populist leaders with their digital political labour. Mutual, nevertheless unequal, exchange of attention leads to the formation of a spiral of attention. Its expansive character is sustained by the strategically subsidized recognition of populist leaders. Accumulated attention, i. e. attention capital, is the resource that is used to maintain populist networked public spheres, while citizens are proletarianized: they are invited to apply their labour power to distributing political ideas but are pevented from evaluating the influence of competing public actors.
Acknowledgements
The research was funded by Slovenian Research Agency (Grant Nr.: J5-3110).
References
Axford, B., & Huggins R. (1997). Anti-politics or the triumph of postmodern populism in promotional cultures? Javnost – The Public, 4(3), 5–25. doi: 10.1080/13183222.1997.1100865010.1080/13183222.1997.11008650Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of postmodernity. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Benkler, Y., Faris R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bickerton, C. J., & Accetti, C. I. (2018). ‘Techno-populism’ as a new party family: The case of the Five Star Movement and Podemos. Contemporary Italian Politics, 10(2), 132–50. doi:10.1080/23248823.2018.147291910.1080/23248823.2018.1472919Search in Google Scholar
Bohman, J. (1997). Deliberative democracy and effective social freedom: Capabilities, resources and opportunities. In J. Bohman, & R. William (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy (pp. 321–48). MIT.10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–58). Greenwood.Search in Google Scholar
Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century (25th anniversary ed.). Monthly Review Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cartillier, J. (2019, September 26). US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky sat down for a meeting in New York – amid the raging impeachment storm in Washington. Yahoo!News. https://news.yahoo.com/trump-ukraines-zelensky-political-tragicomedy-one-act-223131624.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar
Deseriis, M. (2017). Technopopulism: The emergence of a discursive formation. tripleC, 15(2), 441–58. doi:10.31269/triplec.v15i2.77010.31269/triplec.v15i2.770Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1927/1999). The public and its problems. FDV. doi:10.5210/fm.v2i4.519Search in Google Scholar
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.120769710.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697Search in Google Scholar
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.132852510.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525Search in Google Scholar
Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.132933310.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333Search in Google Scholar
Falkinger, J. (2007). Attention economies. Journal of Economic Theory, 133, 266–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2005.12.00110.1016/j.jet.2005.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Favero, A. (2021). Charisma in right-wing populism: Comparing the view of the leader and followers within the Swiss People’s Party. Swiss Political Science Review, 00, 1–19. doi:10.1111/spsr.1251010.1111/spsr.12510Search in Google Scholar
Franck G. (2018). The economy of attention. Journal of Sociology, 55(1), 8–19. doi:10.1177/144078331881177810.1177/1440783318811778Search in Google Scholar
Franck, G. (2005). Mental capitalism. In M. Shamiyeh, & DOM Research Laboratory (Eds.), What people want. Populism in architecture and design (pp. 98–115). Birkhäuser.10.1007/3-7643-7673-2_8Search in Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2018). Authoritarian capitalism, authoritarian movements and authoritarian communication. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 779–791. doi: 10.1177/016344371877214710.1177/0163443718772147Search in Google Scholar
Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. ABLEX Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2018a). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753. doi: 10.1177/016344371877219210.1177/0163443718772192Search in Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2018b). The digital party: Political organisation and online democracy. Pluto Press.10.2307/j.ctv86dg2gSearch in Google Scholar
Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday, 2(4). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/51910.5210/fm.v2i4.519Search in Google Scholar
Guriev, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2020). The political economy of populism. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.354205210.2139/ssrn.3542052Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1962/1989). Strukturne spremembe javnosti [The structural transformation of the public sphere]. ŠKUC.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Polity Press.10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2009). Europe: The faltering project. Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kessous, E. (2015). The attention economy between market capturing and commitment in the polity. Oeconomia, 5(1), Article 1123. doi:10.4000/oeconomia.112310.4000/oeconomia.1123Search in Google Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. doi: 10.2307/209541710.2307/2095417Search in Google Scholar
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1241–1257. doi: 10.1177/146144481452295210.1177/1461444814522952Search in Google Scholar
Maly, I. (2020). Algorithmic populism and the datafication and gamification of the people by Flemish interest in Belgium. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada., 59(1), 444–468. doi:10.1590/0103181368588162020040910.1590/01031813685881620200409Search in Google Scholar
Marincea, A., Školkay, A., Baloge, M., Bertero, A., Bobba, G., Hubé, N., Karamanidou, L., Lipiński, A., Mancosu, M., Matic, D., Sahin, O., Tsatsanis, E., & Dimitri A. Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2021). Populism and social media: A comparative analysis of populists’ shared content and networks on Facebook. Demos Working Papers. Retrieved August 15, 2022 from https://openarchive.tk.mta.hu/490/Search in Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1894/1948). Das Kapital III. [Kapital III]. Kultura.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848/1971). Manifest komunistične stranke [The communist manifesto]. In B. Ziherl (Ed.), Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels: Izbrana dela II [Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels: Collected works II] (pp. 567–631). Cankarjeva založba.Search in Google Scholar
Mayhew, L. H. (1997). The new public: Professional communication and the means of social influence. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511520785Search in Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–63. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.xSearch in Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The Spiral of Silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(1), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pajnik, M., & Ribać M. (2021). Media populism and affective journalism: Newspaper commentary on the refugee crisis. Javnost – The Public, 28(Suppl. 1), S103–S121. doi:10.1080/13183222.2021.201294310.1080/13183222.2021.2012943Search in Google Scholar
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35–67). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar
Pappas. T. S. (2011). Political charisma revisited (and reclaimed for political science) [Working paper RSCAS 2011/60]. EUI. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/19215Search in Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern society. The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., & de Vreese, C. H. (2019). Introduction: Comprehending and investigating populist communication from a comparative perspective. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 1–14). Routledge.10.4324/9780429402067-1Search in Google Scholar
Smythe, D. (1995). On the audience commodity and its work. In O. Boyd-Barrett, & C. Newbold (Eds.), Approaches to media: A reader (pp. 153–163). Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Splichal, S. (2004). Visibility and power in public opinon. Javnost – The Public, 11(Suppl. 1), S13–S27. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2004.1100887210.1080/13183222.2004.11008872Search in Google Scholar
Stankov, P. (2021). The political economy of populism: An introduction. Routledge.10.4324/9780429355691Search in Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2011). For a new critique of political economy. Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stockman, C., & Scalia, V. (2019). Democracy on the Five Star Movement’s Rousseau platform. European Politics and Society, 2(5), 603–617. doi:10.1080/23745118.2019.170556410.1080/23745118.2019.1705564Search in Google Scholar
Šalaj, B., & Grbeša, M. (2022). What is celebrity populism? The case of the Croatian singer Miroslav Škoro. Družboslovne razprave/Social Science Forum, 38(99), 21–43.Search in Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. (1922/1998). Critique of public opinion. FDV.Search in Google Scholar
van Krieken, R. (2012). Theorizing celebrity society. The Newsletter of the Research Committee on Sociological Theory, International Sociological Association, Autumn/Winter, 3–4. https://www.isa-sociology.org/en/research-networks/research-committees/rc16-sociological-theory/Search in Google Scholar
van Krieken, R., forthcoming. Economy of attention and attention capital. In G. Ritzer, & C. Rojek (Eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Media coverage of shifting emotional regimes: Donald Trump’s angry populism. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 766–778. doi: 10.1177/016344371877219010.1177/0163443718772190Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, L., & Lerman, K. (2016). Attention inequality in social media. arXivw [cs.SI]. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1601.07200Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
