Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Czechoslovak intellectual debate on the crisis of democracy in the 1930s

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of the crisis of democracy has been debated abundantly and intensively in recent years. The body of academic literature on the topic has gradually increased. However, a similar debate took place almost one-hundred years ago in the Central European region. At that time, the debate was closely intertwined with the geopolitical situation, especially with the rise of fascism and Nazism. The paper conceptualizes the intellectual discussion on the reasons of the democratic crisis in the 1930s in Czechoslovakia from a sociological and philosophical perspective. The opinions of important Czech intellectuals, such as František Modráček, Emanuel Rádl, Karel Čapek, Edvard Beneš, František Žilka, F.X. Šalda, T.G. Masaryk, J.B. Kozák, and J.L. Fischer, are clarified. Furthermore, some main features of the nature of the past and present crises of democracy are compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, Josette. 2014. The genesis of Czechoslovakism: An interdisciplinary inquiry into the influence of Rousseau’s Réligion Civile. In East European faces of law and society: Values and practices, ed. William B. Simons, 307–345. Brill: Leiden, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bein, Simon. 2018. Demokratien in der Krise? Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft 28 (2): 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beneš, Edvard. 1948. Demokracie dnes a zítra, 8th ed. Prague: Čin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beránek, Petr. 2012. Stigmata of the first Czechoslovak Republic. Journal on European History of Law 3 (1): 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bláhová, Sylvie, and Pavel Dufek. 2018. Identita v liberální politické teorii a dilema kosmopolitismu (2. část). Filosofický Časopis 66 (4): 505–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonn, Moritz Julius. 1925. Die Krisis der europäischen demokratie. München: Meyer & Jessen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broklová, Eva. 1993. Czechs and Slovaks 1918–1938. Czech Sociological Review 1 (1): 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čapek, Karel. 2003. O demokracii, novinách a českých poměrech. Prague: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čapek, Karel. 2013. Hovory s T. G. Masarykem. Prague: Ústav T. G. Masaryka, Masarykův ústav a Archiv AV ČR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čapka, František. 2017. The essence of state social policy in Czechoslovakia in the years of the first republic (1918–1938). Czech-Polish Historic and Pedagogical Journal 9 (1): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.5817/cphpj-2017-003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capoccia, Giovanni. 2012. Legislative responses against extremism The “Protection of Democracy” in the First Czechoslovak Republic (1920–1938). East European Politics and Societies 16 (3): 691–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/088832540201600304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2019. Rupture: The crisis of liberal democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceaser, James W. 1990. Liberal democracy & political science. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel P, and Watanuki Joji. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the governability of democracies to the Trilateral Commission. Available at ˂https://trilateral.org/download/doc/crisis_of_democracy.pdf˃ [cited 07–22–2021].

  • Čulík, Jan. 2015. Karel Čapek (1890–1938): A writer for our times. Russian Literature 77 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruslit.2015.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Ruggiero, Guido. 1929. Dějiny evropského liberalismu. Prague: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneen, Patrick J 2018. Why liberalism failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 2020. Breaking out of the democratic slump. Journal of Democracy 31 (1): 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, Paula. 2016. Die Krise der repräsentativen Demokratie verstehe Ein Beitrag der politischen Theorie. Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft 26 (3): 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-016-0059-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fejtö, François, and Vladimir Claude Fišera. 1976. Le coup de Prague, 1948. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Guy Cromwell. 1960. Political theory. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Josef Ludvík. 2005. Krise demokracie. Prague: Karolinum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, Rainer. 2019. Two bad halves don’t make a whole: On the crisis of democracy. Constellations 26 (3): 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gábriš, Tomáš. 2018. Establishment of legal system of the Czechoslovak Republic (1918). Právny Obzor 101: 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaon, Stella ed. 2009. Democracy in crisis. Violence, alterity, community. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Russell L. 1985. The democratic imagination in America: conversations with our past. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harna, Josef. 2004. Vnitropolitické souvislosti Mnichova: K diskusím o„ krizi demokracie“ v Československu. In Mnichovská dohoda: Cesta k destrukci demokracie v Evropě, ed. J. Němeček, 192–200. Prague: Karolinum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harna, Josef. 2006. Krize evropské demokracie a Československo 30. let 20. století (Srovnávací sonda). Prague: Historický ústav AV ČR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelka, Miloš. 2017. Josef Ludvík Fischer – Udržování intelektuálních pozic v proměňujících se situacích. Lidé Města 19 (1): 89–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimann, Mary. 2009. Czechoslovakia: The state that failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodovský, Ivan. 1993. Reflexe krize demokracie u J. L. Fischera. Sborník Prací Filosofické Fakulty Brněnské University, B 40: 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, Jan. 2006. Fischer, Josef Ludvík: Krise demokracie. 1. Svoboda. 2. Řád. Středoevropské Politické Studie 8 (1): 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höntzsch, Frauke. 2020. Krise der liberalen Demokratie? Nein! Krise des individualistischen Liberalismus. Neue Politische Literatur 65: 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42520-020-00230-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin, Jonathan. 2020. Anti-system politics. The crisis of market liberalism in rich democracies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hudek, Adam, Michal Kopeček, and Jan Mervart, eds. 2022. Czechoslovakism. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isakhan, Benjamin, and Steven Slaughter, eds. 2014. Democracy and Crisis. Democratising governance in the twenty-first century. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubčinová, Martina, and Karol Krajčo. 2018. Historical milestones of the First Czechoslovak Republic. University Review 12 (4): 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janák, Dušan. 2012. Jan Mertl: Pravdu hájící kolaborant, který nezradil. Czech Sociological Review 48 (2): 374–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, Andreas. 2019. Whose crisis? Which democracy? Notes on the current political conjuncture. Constellations 26 (3): 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Karel. 1987. The short march: The communist takeover in Czechoslovakia, 1945–1948. London: C. Hurst & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, Hans. 1933. O podstatě a hodnotě demokracie. Prague: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopeček, Michal. 2019. Czechoslovak interwar democracy and its critical introspections. Journal of Modern European History 17 (1): 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1611894418820217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozák, Jan Blahoslav. 1924. Demokracie a kultura: Řeč pronesená v cyklu předášek O demokracii. Prague: Svaz národního osvobození.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozák, Jan Blahoslav, Edvard Beneš, and Oskar Kraus. 1935. The prague congress of philosophy. The Slavonic and East European Review 13 (38): 330–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krusé, Cornelius. 1935. The eighth international congress of philosophy. The Philosophical Review 44 (1): 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laski, Harold Joseph. 1969. Democracy in crisis. New York: AMC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leicht, Robert. 2010. Zur krise und zukunft der demokratie. In Eine neosoziale Zukunft, ed. Ulrich Pfeiffer, 31–46. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steve, and Lucan Way. 2015. The myth of democratic recession. In Democracy in Decline?, ed. Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner, 58–76. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukeš, Jan. 2001. F. X. Šalda a Manifest Česká moderna. In Česká literatura na předělu století, ed. Jaroslava Janáčková and Jaroslava Hrabáková, 23–42. Jinočany: H & H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masaryk, Tomáš Garrigue. 1991. O demokracii (Výbor ze spisů a projevů). Prague: Melantrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masaryk, Tomáš Garrigue. 1997. Cesta demokracie IV. Prague: Ústav T. G. Masaryka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Med, Jaroslav. 2008. Spisovatelé a krize demokracie. Česká Literatura 56 (4): 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Med, Jaroslav. 2010. Literární život ve stínu Mnichova. Prague: Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2014. Is there a crisis of democracy? Democratic Theory 1 (2): 11–25. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2014.010202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2015. Demokratie und Krise: Zum schwierigen Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mertl, Jan. 1943. Z dějin politického myšlení. Prague: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modráček, František. 1947. Fašistické převraty: Krise poválečných demokracií, 3rd ed. Prague: Jaroslav Salivar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Ernest. 1934. The eighth international congress of philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy 31 (22): 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedelsky, Nadya. 2012. Defining the sovereign community: The Czech and Slovak Republics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, David. 1965. What is liberal protestantism? Theology 68 (545): 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X6506854503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotna, Tereza. 2008. Civic and ethnic conceptions of nationhood in the first Czechoslovak Republic: Emanuel Rádl’s theories of nationalism. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 8 (3): 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2008.00035.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pabst, Adrian. 2019. The demons of liberal democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Gerald. 1983. Reforming the tradition: A forgotten dimension of liberal protestantism. Religion 13 (3): 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(83)90023-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patočka, Jan. 1934. Osmý mezinárodní filosofický kongres v Praze. Nové Školy 8 (2–3): 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlíček, Tomáš. 2010. Spisovatelské instituce v období krize demokracie (1934–1939). Soudobé Dějiny 17 (4): 565–612. https://doi.org/10.51134/sod.2010.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehr, Michal. 2014. Chvála a kritika prvorepublikové demokracie. Historie – Otázky - Problémy 6 (1): 120–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pešat, Zdeněk. 1998. Z kapitol české programové kritiky: F. X. Šalda a Jaroslav Vrchlický. Česká Literatura 46 (3): 229–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikovska, Tetyana Valentinovna. 2020a. Ideological and legal basis of the national issue in the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938). Colloquium Journal 81 (29): 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikovska, Tetyana Valentinovna. 2020b. Party system in the in the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938). Sciences of Europe 2 (55): 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, Thomas, Sigrid Rossteutscher, Rudiger Schmitt-Beck, and Sonja Zmerli, eds. 2015. Citizenship and democracy in an era of crisis. Essays in honour of Jan W. van Deth. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. 2010. The crisis of capitalist democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pospíšil, Ivo. 2010. Singularity and the czech interwar essay among the currents: František Xaver Šalda, Karel Čapek, and Jaroslav Durych. Primerjalna Književnost 33 (1): 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 2019. Crisis of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pytlík, Radko. 1987. Vilém Mrštík a F. X. Šalda — dvě koncepce literatury let devadesátých. Česká Literatura 35 (5/6): 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rádl, Emanuel. 1931. Krize demokracie. Křesťanská Revue 4: 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rádl, Emanuel. 1932. K programu VIII. Mezinárodního sjezdu filosofického v Praze. Česká Mysl: Časopis Filosofický 28 (1): 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rádl, Emanuel. 1933. Dvojí demokracie. Naše Doba: Revue pro Umění, Vědu a Život Sociální 40 (5): 271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, David D. 1982. Frustrated liberals: De Ruggiero, gobetti, and the challenge of socialism. Canadian Journal of History 17 (1): 59–86. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjh.17.1.59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychlík, Jan. 2017. Idea čechoslovakismu versus dotváření svébytného slovenského politického národa v První československé republice. Studia Historica Nitriensia 21 (2): 431–440. https://doi.org/10.17846/SHN.2017.21.2.431-440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, Gary S. 2016. Der aktuelle Diskurs über die Krise der Demokratie. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 10 (3–4): 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-016-0310-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1985. The crisis of parliamentary democracy. Cambridge, Mass, London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šimsa, Martin. 2004. Masarykův a Habermasův pojem demokracie. In Demokracie, veřejnost a občanská společnost, ed. M. Hrubec, 135–146. Prague: Filosofia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovajsa, Marek. 2012. Ani kolaborant, ani oběť: Mertl jako sociolog politiky. Czech Sociological Review 48 (2): 367–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, Jaromír. 2020. Alternativní cesta k socialism: František Modráček a jeho ideje. Historica: Revue pro Historii a Příbuzné Vědy 11 (1): 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toplišek, Alen. 2019. Liberal democracy in crisis: Rethinking resistance under neoliberal governmentality. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Beld, Antonie. 2003. Masaryk a postmoderní kritika: Potřebuje západní demokracie filosofické založení? Filosofický Časopis 51 (1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vink, Matthew. 2012. The competition for self-determination in Czechoslovakia, 1918–1919. New Zealand Slavonic Journal 46: 41–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vít, Jan. 2017. Osobnosti: Jan patočka. Prague: Středisko společných činností AV ČR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vormann, Boris, and Christian Lammert. 2019. Democracy in crisis: The neoliberal roots of popular unrest. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vysny, Paul. 2003. The runciman mission to czechoslovakia 1938: Prelude to Munich. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöhl, Stefanie. 2013. Die “Krise” der repräsentativen Demokratie in Europa. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 26 (1): 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žilka, František. 1933. Víra v demokracii. Naše Doba: Revue pro Vědu, Umění a Život Sociální 40 (6): 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Znoj, Milan, Ladislav Major, Jiří Pešek, and Milan Sobotka. 1990. Spor o demokracii na VIII. Mezinárodním filosofickém kongresu v Praze v roce 1934. Filosofický Časopis 38 (1–2): 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Internal Grant Agency of the AMBIS College, Prague.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AMBIS College, Lindnerova 575/1, 180 00, Prague 8 – Libeň, Czech Republic

    Marián Sekerák

Authors
  1. Marián Sekerák
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marián Sekerák.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekerák, M. Czechoslovak intellectual debate on the crisis of democracy in the 1930s. Stud East Eur Thought 75, 33–51 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-021-09456-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-021-09456-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation