Abstract
Curiously, while the efficacy of the arts for the development of multicultural understandings has long been theorized, empirical studies of this effect have been lacking. This essay recounts our combined empirical and philosophical study of this issue. We explicate the philosophical considerations that shaped the development of the arts course we studied, which was grounded in rather traditional humanist educational thought, informed by Deweyan considerations for pedagogy and multiculturalism. We also provide an overview of the course and of the study design: the ways in which the course worked to teach aesthetic theory through a combination of popular and canonical works, and the ways in which it sought to instill a sense of cross-cultural appreciation and solidarity among students through the inclusion of art from different cultures and generations. We then share our research findings and our return to the realm of philosophy to interpret them. Our postcolonial analysis incorporates emerging discussions of the arts as a tool for resistance and dialogue within the system of public education, and revisit and reconsider the very concept of education for pluralistic democracy. This approach problematizes traditional conceptions of pluralism, in which an attempt is made to dissolve difference in a common understanding, and instead advocates that works from among the contemporary popular arts and works drawn from the artistic “canon” alike must be considered and employed for their instrumental value to the educational process—especially for their ability to prompt an intersubjectivity that is accompanied by a heightened awareness of difference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguirre, I. (2004). Beyond the understanding of visual culture: A pragmatist approach to aesthetic education. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 23(3), 256–269.
Alexander, T. M. (1995). Educating the human heart: Pluralism, traditions and the humanities. In J. Garrison (Ed.), The new scholarship on Dewey (pp. 75–84). Boston: Kluwer.
Bennett, J., & Salonen, R. (2007). Intercultural communication and the new American campus. Change, March/April, 46–50.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Chesler, M. A., Lewis, A. E., & Crowfoot, J. (2005). Challenging racism in higher education: Promoting justice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Chung, S. K. (2007). Media literacy art education: Deconstructing lesbian and gay stereotypes in the media. Jade, 26(1), 98–107.
Clendinnen, I. (1996). Fellow sufferers: History and imagination. Australian Humanities Review, 3. Retrieved from http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-Sept-1996/clendinnen.html.
Cooks, L. (2003). Pedagogy, performance, and positionality: Teaching about whiteness in interracial communication. Communication Education, 52(3/4), 245–257.
Dewey, J. (1976). Nationalizing education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924, Vol. 10 (pp. 202–210). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press (1916).
Dewey, J. (1980). American education and culture. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924, Vol. 10 (pp. 196–197). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1917).
Dewey, J. (1981a). Art as experience. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Vol. 10 (pp. 10–366). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1934).
Dewey, J. (1981b). The need for a philosophy of education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Vol. 9 (pp. 194–204). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press (1934).
Greene, M. (1995). Art and imagination: Reclaiming the sense of possibility. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(5), 378–382.
Gur-Ze’ev, I. (1996). Aporia of emancipatory education: The case of multicultural education. In Papers of the Conference. Oxford: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, 129–133. Draft version retrieved from http://construct.haifa.ac.il/~ilangz/aporia.htm.
Harris, T. M. (2003). Impacting student perceptions of and attitudes toward race in the interracial communication course. Communication Education, 52(3/4), 311–317.
Jackson, P. W. (1994). If we took Dewey’s aesthetics seriously, how would the arts be taught? In J. Garrison (Ed.), The new scholarship on Dewey (pp. 27–34). Boston: Kluwer.
Jackson, P. W. (1998). John Dewey and the lessons of art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Macbeth, D. (2001). On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings, and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(35), 35–68.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (2002). Solidarity or objectivity? In K. B. Wray (Ed.), Knowledge and inquiry (pp. 422–437). Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press, Ltd.
Said, E. (1994). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.
Sayers, J., Bathurst, R., & Symonds, H. (2007). Irony’s architecture: Reflections on a photographic research project. Massey University Department of Management and International Business Research, Working Paper Series 3. Retrieved 8/7/2009l from http://digitalcommons.massey.ac.nz/bitstream/10179/555/3/iarsbs.pdf.
Seltzer-Kelly, D., Westwood, S. J., & Peña-Guzman, D. (2009). Krippendorff’s Alpha and the ontological and epistemological implications of intercoder reliability. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
Shusterman, R. (1994). Popular art and education. In J. Garrison (Ed.), The new scholarship on Dewey (pp. 35–37). Boston: Kluwer.
Simpson, J. S., Causey, A., & Williams, L. (2007). I would want you to understand it: Students’ perspectives on addressing race in the classroom. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(1), 33–50.
Sleeter, C. E. (2005). Un-standardizing curriculum: Multicultural teaching in the standards-based classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stroud, S. R. (2007). Dewey on arts as evocative communication. Education and Culture, 23(2), 6–26.
Taylor, P. C. (2002). The two-Dewey thesis, continued Shusterman’s pragmatist aesthetics. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 16(1), 17–25.
Todd, S. (2009). Can there be pluralism without conflict? In N. C. Burbules & D. Kerdeman (Eds.), Philosophy of education 2009 (pp. 51–59). Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Tommy the Clown (2006). About Tommy. Clown Street Productions. Retrieved from http://www.tommytheclown.com/about.html.
TuSmith, B., & Reddy, M. T. (Eds.). (2002). Racism in the college classroom: Pedagogy and politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
University of Nevada, Reno. (2010). Databook: 2007. Retrieved from http://www.cis.unr.edu/IA_Web/databook.aspx?DatabookYear=%27NA%27.
Waks, L. (2009). Inquiry, agency and art: John Dewey’s contribution to pragmatic cosmopolitanism. Education and Culture, 25(2), 115–125.
Washoe County School District (2009–10). Racial/ethnic report: 1980–81 to 2009–10: Summary. Retrieved from http://www.washoe.k12.nv.us/docs/community/reports/racial-ethnic/Ethnic_Report_09-10_summary.pdf.
Weinstein, J. R. (2004). Neutrality, pluralism, and education: Civic education as learning about the other. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 23, 235–263.
Williams, R. (1983). Culture and society: 1780–1950. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wilson, T. C. (2006). Whites’ opposition to affirmative action: Rejection of group-based preferences as well as rejection of blacks. Social Forces, 85(1), 111–120.
Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race media literacy: Challenging deficit discourse about Chicanas/os. Journal of Popular Film & Television, 30(1), 52–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seltzer-Kelly, D., Westwood, S.J. & Peña-Guzman, D.M. Deweyan Multicultural Democracy, Rortian Solidarity, and the Popular Arts: Krumping into Presence. Stud Philos Educ 29, 441–457 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9190-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9190-y