Skip to main content
Log in

The Moral Reasoning of HEC Members

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Pellegrino ED, McElhinney TK. Teaching ethics, the humanities, and human values in medical schools: A ten-year overview. Washington, D.C.: Society for Health and Human Values. 1981; 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McElhinney TK. (ed.) Human values teaching programs for health professionals. Ardmore, PA: Whitmore Publishing Co.; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bickel J. Integrating human values teaching programs into medical students' clinical education. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1986:1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perkins HS, Saathoff BS. Impact of medical ethics consultations on physicians: An exploratory study. The American Journal of Medicine. 1988; 85:761–65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perkins HS. Clinical ethics consultations: Reasons for optimism, but problems exist. The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1992; 3(2):133–37.

    Google Scholar 

  7. In the matter of Karen Quinlan, an alleged incompetent. Supreme Court of New Jersey, 70 N.J. 10, 335 A. 2d 647.

  8. Barber v. Superior Court, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484, 486 (Cal. App. 1983).

  9. In re Infant Doe, No. GU 8204–00 (Cir. Ct. Monroe County, Ind., April 12, 1982), writ of mandamus dismissed sub nom. Infant Doe v. Baker, No. 482-S-140 (Indiana Supreme Court, May 27, 1982) (case mooted by child's death).

  10. Weber v. Stony Brook Hosp., 52 U.S.L.W. 2267 (N.Y. October 28, 1983); United States v. University Hosp., No. CV83–4818 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 1983).

  11. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Defining death, Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Document, U. S. Government Printing Office; 1981.

  12. Pence, GE. The baby Jane Doe case. In Classic cases in medical ethics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.; 1990:136–63.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Youngner SJ, Jackson DL, Coulton C, Juknialis BW, Smith EM. A national survey of hospital ethics committees. Critical Care Medicine. 1983; 11(11):902–905.

    Google Scholar 

  14. AHA, National Society for Patient Representatives. Ethics committees double since '83: survey. Hospitals. (Nov.1) 1985:60, 64.

  15. Self DJ, Skeel JD. Facilitating healthcare ethics research: Assessment of moral reasoning and moral orientation from a single interview. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 1992; 4:371–76.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development. (Vol. II) The psychology of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brown L, Argyris D, Attanucci J, Bardige B, Gilligan C, Johnston D, Miller B, Osborne R, Ward J, Wiggins G, Wilcox D. A guide to reading narratives of moral conflict and choice for self and moral voice. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of Gender, Education, and Human Development, Harvard Graduate School of Education; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kohlberg L. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In Lickona T. (ed.) Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1976: 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development. (Vol. 1) The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Colby A, Kohlberg L. The measurement of moral judgment. (Vol. I) Theoretical foundations and research validation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Modgil S, Modgil C. (eds.) Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piaget J. The moral judgment of the child. [1932] Gabain M. (trans.) New York, NY: Free Press; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dewey J. Moral principles in education. New York, NY: Philosophical Library; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Snarey JR. Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlbergian research. Psychological Bulletin. 1985; 97:202–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nisan M, Kohlberg L. Universality and cross-cultural variation in moral development: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study in Turkey. Child Development. 1982; 53:865–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Colby A, Kohlberg L. The measurement of moral judgment. (Vol. I) Theoretical foundations and research validation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1987: 77–117.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tappan M, Kohlberg L, Schrader D, Higgins A, Armon C, Lei T. Heteronomy and autonomy in moral development: Two types of moral judgments. In Colby A, Kohlberg L. (eds.) The measurement of moral judgment. (Vol. I) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1987:315–87.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Logan R, Snarey J, Schrader D. Autonomous versus heteronomous moral judgment types: A longitudinal cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1990; 21(1):71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kohlberg L. Justice as reversibility: The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment In Essays on moral development. (Vol 1) The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row Publishers; 190–226.

  30. Rawls J. Justice as fairness. The Journal of Philosophy. 1957; 54:653–62.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rawls J. A theory of justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kant I. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. [1785] Beck L. (trans.), Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kant I. Critique of practical reason. [1788] Beck L (trans.) Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gilligan C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Noddings N. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gilligan C, Attanucci J. Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1988;33:223–37.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lyons N. Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality. Harvard Educational Review. 1983; 53:125–45.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Self DJ, Olivarez M. The influence of gender on conflicts of interest in the allocation of limited critical care resources: Justice vs. care. Journal of Critical Care. 1993; 8(1):64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dobrin A. Ethical judgments of male and female social workers. Social Work. 1989; 34:451–55.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Self DJ, Pierce AB, Shadduck JA. Description and evaluation of a course in veterinary ethics. The Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 1995; 207(12):1550–53.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Self DJ, Olivarez M, Baldwin DC Jr. The amount of small group case study discussion required to improve moral reasoning skills of medical students. [Unpublished]

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Self, D.J., Skeel, J.D. The Moral Reasoning of HEC Members. HEC Forum 10, 43–54 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008858618487

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008858618487

Keywords

Navigation