Abstract
Which individuals should count in a welfare-consequentialist analysis of public policy? Some answers to this question are parochial, and others are more inclusive. The most inclusive possible answer is ‘everybody to count for one.’ In other words, all individuals who are capable of having welfare – including foreigners, the unborn, and non-human animals – should be weighed equally. This article argues that ‘who should count’ is a question that requires a two-level answer. On the first level, a specification of welfare-consequentialism serves as an ethical ideal, a claim about the attributes that the ideal policy would have. ‘Everybody to count for one’ might succeed on this level. However, on the second level is the welfare-consequentialist analysis procedure used by human analysts to give advice on real policy questions. For epistemic reasons, the analysis procedure should be more parochial than ‘everybody to count for one.’
References
Adler, M. D. 2019. Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Alexander, L. 1985. “Pursuing the Good–Indirectly.” Ethics 95: 315–32, https://doi.org/10.1086/292633.Search in Google Scholar
Alexandrova, A. 2017. A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199300518.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Angner, E. 2009. “The Politics of Happiness: Subjective vs. Economic Measures as Measures of Social Well-Being.” In Philosophy and Happiness, edited by L. Bortolotti. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.2139/ssrn.1278163Search in Google Scholar
Arneson, R. J. 1999. “What, if Anything, Renders All Humans Morally Equal?” In Singer and his Critics, edited by D. Jamieson. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Son.10.1093/oseo/instance.00077240Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein, M. H. 2015. The Moral Equality of Humans and Animals. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137315250Search in Google Scholar
Boadway, R. W., and A. Shah. 2007. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, J. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Briffault, R. 1990. “Our Localism.” Columbia Law Review 90 (1): 1–115, https://doi.org/10.2307/1122837.Search in Google Scholar
Brinkmann, M. 2019. “Indirect Instrumentalism about Political Legitimacy.” Moral Philosophy and Politics 6 (1): 175–202, https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2018-0024.Search in Google Scholar
Bronsteen, J., C. Buccafusco, and J. S. Masur. 2010. “Welfare as Happiness.” The Georgetown Law Journal 98: 1583–641.Search in Google Scholar
Bronsteen, J., C. Buccafusco, and J. S. Masur. 2015. Happiness and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226195667.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Burke, E. 1790. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: James Dodsley.Search in Google Scholar
Dolan, P., and M. P. White. 2007. “How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 2: 71–85, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x.Search in Google Scholar
Feddersen, T., S. Gailmard, and A. Sandroni. 2009. “Moral Bias in Large Elections: Theory and Experimental Evidence.” The American Political Science Review 103: 175–92, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409090224.Search in Google Scholar
Feldman, F. 2012. “True and Useful: On the Structure of a Two-Level Normative Theory.” Utilitas 24 (2): 151–71, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0953820812000155.Search in Google Scholar
Forman-Barzilai, F. 2010. Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy: Cosmopolitanism and Moral Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511676352Search in Google Scholar
Funk, C. L. 2000. “The Dual Influence of Self-Interest and Societal Interest in Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 53: 37–62, https://doi.org/10.2307/449245.Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 1988. “What Is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?” Ethics 98 (4): 663–86, https://doi.org/10.1086/292998.Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625053Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. 2007. “Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and its Alternatives.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1): 40–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x.Search in Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E., and K. Spiekermann. 2018. An Epistemic Theory of Democracy. London: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198823452.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hardimon, M. 1994. “Role Obligations.” The Journal of Philosophy 91: 333–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/2940934.Search in Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1960/2011. The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226320519.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Holtug, N. 2015. “Theories of Value Aggregation: Utilitarianism, Egalitarianism, Prioritarianism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory, edited by J. Olson, and I. Hirose. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199959303.013.0015Search in Google Scholar
Howard, D. S. 2018. “The Scoundrel and the Visionary: On Reasonable Hope and the Possibility of a Just Future.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 27 (3): 294–317, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12175.Search in Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1991. “Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection.” Ethics 101 (3): 461–82, https://doi.org/10.1086/293312.Search in Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. 2011. Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921766Search in Google Scholar
Johansson, P.-O., and G. de Rus. 2019. “On the Treatment of Foreigners and Foreign-owned Firms in the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transport Projects.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 53: 199–211.Search in Google Scholar
Johansson-Stenman, O. 2018. “Animal Welfare and Social Decisions: Is It Time to Take Bentham Seriously?” Ecological Economics 145: 90–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.019.Search in Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.’” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88, https://doi.org/10.2307/973677.Search in Google Scholar
Miklós, A., and A. Tanyi. 2017a. “Institutional Consequentialism and Global Governance.” Journal of Global Ethics 13 (3): 279–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2018.1425218.Search in Google Scholar
Miklós, A., and A. Tanyi. 2017b. Consequentialism and its Demands: The Role of Institutions. Also available at https://www.academia.edu/18043101/Consequentialism_and_Its_Demands_The_Role_of_Institutions_with_Andras_Miklos_.Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1852. “Whewell’s Moral Philosophy.” In Dissertations and Discussions: Political, Philosophical, and Historical. London: John W. Parker and Son.Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1861. “Chapter XV—Of Local Representative Bodies.” In Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn.Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1861/1895. Utilitarianism. London: Longmans, Green and Company.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. 2005. “Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots.” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 8 (1–2): 63–81, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-3296-2.Search in Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. 2013. The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1986. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019824908X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1966/2009. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971 [2009]. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Risse, M. 2012. On Global Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Samuels, B. 2018. “Trump: ‘You know what I am? I’m a nationalist.’” The Hill, October 22. from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/412649-trump-you-know-what-i-am-im-a-nationalist.Search in Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. 2002. “Making Sense of ‘What Works’: Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Rationality?” Public Policy and Administration 17 (3): 61–75.10.1177/095207670201700305Search in Google Scholar
Sen, A., and B. Williams. (eds.) 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611964Search in Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2016. Analysis and Public Policy Successes, Failures and Directions for Reform. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1890. Methods of Ethics, 4th ed. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1990. Animal Liberation. New York: New York Review of Books: Distributed by Random House.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2006. “Introduction,” In In Defense of Animals: The Second Wave. edited by P. Singer, 248. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Search in Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2011. The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400838431Search in Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2016. Ethics in the Real World: 82 Brief Essays on Things that Matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400888733Search in Google Scholar
Stark, C. A. 1997. “Decision Procedures, Standards of Rightness and Impartiality.” Noûs 31: 478–95.10.1111/0029-4624.00057Search in Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E., A. Sen, and J.-P. Fitoussi. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris, France: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.Search in Google Scholar
Tiberius, V. 2006. “Well-Being: Psychological Research for Philosophers.” Philosophy Compass 1 (5): 493–505.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00038.xSearch in Google Scholar
Wisor, S. 2014. “The Moral Problem of Worse Actors.” Ethics & Global Politics 7 (2): 47–64.10.3402/egp.v7.23524Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
