Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do inspection practices in organic agriculture serve organic values? A case study from Finland

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many European countries,organic agriculture has rapidly beentransformed from a farmers' movement to aninstitutionalized part of agricultural policy.In certification, compliance with publishedorganic standards is verified through annualinspections on farms. In Finland, the role ofadvice in organic inspections has been thesubject of debate. Two inspections are usedhere to show how the term organic was definedand what the role of advice in relation tocompliance was. Both compliance and advisorytypes of interaction between the inspector andthe farmer were identified along an axis from “input substitution” to “system redesign.” Thefindings illustrate the heterogeneity of theprocesses and definitions of the term organicin connection with inspections. System redesignwas less obvious in compliance than items ininspection documents suggest. The physicalsurroundings and the methods used affectinspection practices. Institutionalization isnot merely negative, but may also provideresources for system redesign. Whether adviceis part of a new and emerging way of enforcinginspections is considered. The findings suggestthat dialogue and negotiation are necessary inpromoting system redesign and in enhancing thedevelopmental functions of organicinspections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts, N. and C. van Woerkum (1999). “Communication and nature policies: The need for an integral approach to policy design.” In C. Leeuwis (ed.), Integral Design: Innovation in Agriculture and Resource Management. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Mansholt Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. and P. Rosset (1996). “Agroecology and the conversion of large-scale conventional systems to sustainable management.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 50: 165-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman (1997). “From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California.” Sociologia Ruralis 37(1): 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2001). “Conviction seeking efficacy: Sustainable agriculture and the politics of co-optation.” Agriculture and Human Values 18: 353-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H. and R. Liepins (2001). “Naming organics: Understanding organic standards in New Zealand as a discursive field.” Sociologia Ruralis 41(1): 21-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activitytheoretical view on developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. Retrieved from http://communication. ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/Expanding/toc.htm on 20 February 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., R. Miettinen, and R-L. Punamäki (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. (2000). “Organic and conventional agriculture: Materializing discourse and agro-ecological managerialism.” Agriculture and Human Values 17: 215-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (1998). “Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: The codification of California organic agriculture.” Antipode 30(2): 135-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2000). “Raising organic: An agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California.” Agriculture and Human Values 17: 257-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haavisto, V. (2002). Court Work in Transition. An Activitytheoretical Study of Changing Work Practices in a Finnish District Court. Department of Education, University of Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. and R. Gomm (2000). “Introduction.” In Roger Gomm, Martyn Hammersley, and Peter Foster (eds.), Case Study Method. Key Issues, Key Texts (pp. 1-16). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, S. and J. Kieksi (1998). Luonnonmukaisen maataloustuotannon valvonta 1998-tarkastajan käsikirja. [Control for Organic Agriculture 1998-Inspector's Manual.] [in Finnish] Kasvintuotannon tarkastuskeskus, Loimaa. B2 Luomutuotanto 2/98.

  • Hémidy, L. and M. Cerf (2000). “Managing change in advisory services: Controlling the dynamics of resource transformation and use.” In LEARN Group (eds.), Cow up a Tree. Knowing and Learning for Change in Agriculture. Case Studies from Industrialised Countries (pp. 351-368). Paris: INRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM and IOIA. (2000). International Organic Inspection Manual. Compiled and edited by James A. Riddle and Joyce E. Ford. IFOAM (International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements) & IOIA (Indepentent Organic Inspectors Association).

  • Kaltoft, P. (1999). “Values about nature in organic farming practice and knowledge.” Sociologia Ruralis 39(1): 39-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, L. (1998). Finnish Agriculture 1997. Finland: I. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Research Publications 86a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J. P. Grime, A. Hector, D. U. Hooper, M. A. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, D. Tilman, and D. A. Wardle (2001). “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.” Science 294: 804-808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. and K. Jordan (2000). “Patents, promotions and protocols: Mapping and claiming scientific territory.” Mind, Culture and Activity 7(1-2): 124-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (1998). Hakuopas 1998. [Manual for Subsidy Applications 1998.] [in Finnish].

  • Michelsen, J. (2001). “Organic farming in a regulatory perspective. The Danish case.” Sociologia Ruralis 41(1): 62-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, M. (1999). “Improving the management of technology development through mediation.” The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 6(2): 93-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant Production Inspection Centre (2000). Organic Farming 1998-Statistics. Finland: Loimaa [in Finnish].

    Google Scholar 

  • Puonti, A. (2003). “Collaboration as a learning challenge: Constructing a common understanding between policy officers and tax inspectors in a tax crime case.” Police Practice & Research 4(2): 131-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D. and D. Cáceres (2001). “Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems.” Agricultural Systems 68(2001): 21-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P. M. and M. Altieri (1997). “Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture.” Society and Natural Resources 10: 283-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State. How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen, L. (1999). Organic Vegetable Farming and Its Zone of Proximal Development. Working Papers Number 15/1999. Helsinki, Finland: Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research, Department of Education, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen, L. (2002). “Creating tools for farmers' learning: An application of developmental work research.” Agricultural Systems 73(1): 129-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirén, J. (1999). Finnish Agriculture and Rural Industries 1998. Finland: Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Research Publications 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2000). “Embodied practices of engineering work.” Mind, Culture and Activity 7(1-2): 4-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, H. (1997). “Food, environmentalism and rural sociology: On the organic farming movement in Ireland.” Sociologia Ruralis 37(1): 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, D. (2000). “Talk, templates and tradition: How the masons built Chartres Cathedral without plans.” In D. Turnbull (ed.), Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers. Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoog, H., M. Matze, E. Lammerts van Bueren, and T. Baars (2003). “Integrity, ecology and environmental care: Aspects to understand the concept of nature and naturalness in organic farming.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16(1): 29-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viertola-Jern, P. (2002). Appeal to the Finnish Parliament for the Development of Organic Inspection Systems. Finfood Luomu, 1 October 2002 [in Finnish].

  • Virkkunen, J. (1991). “Toward transforming structures of communication in work: The case of Finnish labor protection inspectors.” The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 13(4) (October): 97-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virkkunen, J. (1995). Työpaikkatarkastuksen ristiriidat ja niiden ylittämisen mahdollisuudet. Tutkimus keskusteluun perustuvan työn välineistä ja tuloksellisuudesta. [Internal Contradictions in Inspections and the Prospects for Overcoming Them-an Inquiry into the Tools and Effectiveness of Discussion-Based Work.] Finland: Ministry of Labor, Labor Political Research Number 123 [in Finnish, summary in English].

    Google Scholar 

  • Virkkunen, J. and K. Kuutti (2000). “Understanding organizational learning by focusing on ‘activity systems.’ ” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 10(2000): 291-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Østergaard, E. (1998). One Step Back and Two Steps Forward. A Phenomenological Study of Farmers in Conversion to Ecological Agriculture. Doctoral dissertation, p. 25. Department of Horticulture and Crop Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway [in Norwegian].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Seppänen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seppänen, L., Helenius, J. Do inspection practices in organic agriculture serve organic values? A case study from Finland. Agriculture and Human Values 21, 1–13 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000014021.76147.7d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHUM.0000014021.76147.7d

Navigation