Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Private Enforcer as a Participant of Legal Relations in the Executive Process

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the fact that in the reforms of the system of compulsory enforcement of decisions stipulated the possibility of performing these functions by private enforcers. The purpose of the article is to consider problematic aspects of the legal status of a private enforcer as a participant of legal relations in the enforcement process. The results of the study contain generalizations on the analysis of the legal status of a private enforcer, proposals for amendments to current legislation on private enforcers and the protection of the rights of the parties of enforcement proceedings. Finally, conclusions were formulated, which may be useful to practitioners of various legal professions such private enforcers, lawyers, judges, as well as citizens and legal persons, including those who are parties to the executive procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Data will be available on request.

References

  1. Kuzjmina, I. 2014. The place of private enforcers in the system of subjects of executive proceedings. Comparative and Analytical Law 8: 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Samilyk, L.O., V.O. Maliarova, O.V. Dzhafarova, T.I. Gudz, and V.B. Kovalchuk. 2019. Complementary medicine: International experience of functioning and specific features of the application in Ukraine. Wiadomosci Lekarskie 72 (5): 1103–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Korolov, V.V., I.M. Dolianovska, M.V. Hryhorchuk, and Y.V. Vyshnevska. 2020. Theoretical and practical aspects of counteracting unfair competition and violation of antimonopoly laws. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9: 1533–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Constitution of Ukraine. 1996. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254k/96-vr Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  5. Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. 2004. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  6. Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine. 1992. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12/ed19911106#Text Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  7. Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. 2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12/ed19911106#Text Accessed 15 Febr 2023.

  8. Criminal Procedure Code. 2013. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  9. Law of Ukraine On Enforcement Proceedings. 2016. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1404-19#Text Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  10. Law of Ukraine On Bodies and Persons Who Carry Out Enforcement of Court Decisions and Decisions of Other Bodies. 2016. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1403-19#Text. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  11. Sybirianska, Y., M. Dyba, I. Britchenko, A. Ivashchenko, Y. Vasylyshen, and Y. Polishchuk. 2018. Fintech platforms in sme’s financing: EU experience and ways of their application in Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 15 (3): 83–96. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Common position of the EU project Law-Justice and the USAID program New Justice. 2020. Why Ukraine needs new legislation for implementation of decisions. https://newjustice.org.ua/uk/novini/navishho-ukrayini-potribne-nove-zakonodavstvo-shhodo-vikonannya-rishen/. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  13. Marchenko, M. 2016. Becoming a private enforcer in Ukraine. Enterprise, Economy and Law 4: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The procedure conducts an inspection of the activities of state executive service bodies and private enforcers. 2018. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1195-18#Text. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  15. Ovcharenko, O., and Solomko, O. 2021. Analysis of the practice of attraction private enforcers to disciplinary responsibilities. https://www.pravojustice.eu/storage/app/uploads/public/603/619/67c/60361967c7197115524258.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  16. Avtorghov, A. 2018. The Ministry of Justice’s control over private enforcers: protection of the rights of the parties or a means of pressure? https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/inshe/kontrol-minyustu-za-privatnimi-vikonavcyami-zahist-prav-storin-chi-zasib-tisku.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  17. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. 1984. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  18. Ghusarjev, S., and O. Tykhomyrov. 2005. Legal deontology (basics of legal activity). Kyiv: Znannya.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perepelytsia, A. 2005. Organizational and legal principles of the state executive service. Irpin: National Academy of State Tax Service of Ukraine.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lisova, O., M. Shevyakov, and O. Orlova. 2021. Administrative-territorial reform in Ukraine: Normative-legal aspect of decentralization reform in Ukraine. Journal of International Legal Communication 1 (1): 112–124. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2021.1.pp.112-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shcherbak, S. 2002. Administrative and legal regulation of enforcement proceedings in Ukraine. Kyiv: NAS of Ukraine.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Makushev, P. 2012. Characteristics and significance of special principles of enforcement proceedings in the activities of the state executive service. Actual Problems of Domestic Jurisprudence 3: 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fursa, S., and S. Shherbak. 2002. Enforcement proceedings in Ukraine. Kyiv: Atika.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bagirova, G. 2021. Legislation of the social and legal status of self-employed persons in Ukraine. Journal of International Legal Communication 1 (1): 31–39. https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2021.1.pp.31-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lavrentieva, O., Pererva, V., Krupskyi, O., Britchenko, I., and Shabanov, S. (2020). Issues of shaping the students' professional and terminological competence in science area of expertise in the sustainable development era. In Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences 166. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610031 Accessed 15 Feb 2023

  26. Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine On certain issues of jurisdiction of administrative courts. 2013. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0008760-13#Text. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  27. Regulations on the Scientific Advisory Board at the Supreme Administrative Court of Ukraine. 2016. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0002760-13#Text. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  28. Decision of the Supreme Court of the Panel of Judges of the Administrative Court of Cassation of September 3, 2018 in case No. 9901/638/18. 2018. https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/76273151 Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  29. Averyanov, V.B. 2007. Administrative law of Ukraine, 592. Kyiv: Jurudychna dumka.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Agapov, A.B. 2009. Administrative law, 813. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hliborob, N. 2012. Public law dispute as a subject of jurisdictional activity of the administrative court. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic National University.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Instructions on the Organization of Enforcement of Decisions. 2012. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0489-12#Text Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  33. Tkachuk, O. 2016. Reforms for samples. What models of enforcement of court decisions are used in European countries and what changes should Ukraine move towards. Law and Business, 37. https://zib.com.ua/ua/print/125519-yaki_modeli_vikonannya_sudovih_rishen_vikoristovuyut_u_krain.html Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  34. Polishchuk, M., and Andrievska, L. 2009. Peculiarities of executive implementation of foreign legislation and harmonization of domestic legislation in the context of European integration. In The Role of Private Law of Ukraine in Ensuring Human Rights: Materials All-Ukrainian. Scientific-Practical Seminar. Dnipro: Publisher Bila K.O., 46–48.

  35. Shelever, N. 2016. Peculiarities of enforcement proceedings in the countries of the European Union. Forum Prava 1: 262–266.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Conclusion No. 13 of the Advisory Council of European Judges On the role of judges in the enforcement of judgments. 2010. https://www.coe.int/en/web/ccje/opinion-n-13-on-the-role-of-judges-in-the-enforcement-of-judicial-decisions. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  37. Case of Comingersoll S.A. V. Portugal. Application No. 35382/97. 2000. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58562%22]}. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  38. Case of Hornsby V. Greece. Application no. 18357/91. 1997. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_079#Text. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  39. Case of Fuklev V. Ukrain. Application No. 71186/01. 2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_022#Text. Accessed 15 Feb 2023.

  40. Bohdan, S., K. Vitalii, H. Taras, Z. Dmytro, and K. Serhii. 2019. Historical and legal analysis of development of administrative responsibility for unauthorized occupation of a land plot. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22 (6): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sergiienko, N., V. Galagan, Z. Udovenko, A. Cherneha, and N. Oblovatska. 2021. Reflections on the respect of the rights of citizens during judicial decisions of enforcement. Cuestiones Políticas 39 (68): 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public and Private Law, Faculty of Law and International Relations, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13B Tymoshenko Str., Kyiv, 04212, Ukraine

    Nataliia A. Sergiienko, Olga M. Baitaliuk, Nataliia S. Khatniuk & Oksana I. Chapliuk

  2. Department of Private Law Disciplines, Faculty of Law, University of Modern Knowledge, 57/3 Velyka Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine

    Nelli B. Pobiianska

Authors
  1. Nataliia A. Sergiienko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olga M. Baitaliuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nataliia S. Khatniuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oksana I. Chapliuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nelli B. Pobiianska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Authors’ contributions are equal.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nataliia A. Sergiienko.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no financial and competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

All individual participants agreed to be included in the study.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sergiienko, N.A., Baitaliuk, O.M., Khatniuk, N.S. et al. Private Enforcer as a Participant of Legal Relations in the Executive Process. Int J Semiot Law 36, 1293–1310 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09988-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-09988-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation