References
Douglas, H. 2003. The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility). American Philosophical Quarterly 40(1): 59–68.
Forbes, C. 2017. A Pragmatic, Existentialist Approach to the Scientific Realism Debate. Synthese 194(9): 3327–3346.
Khalifa, K. 2012. The Role of Explanation in Understanding. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64(1): 161–187.
Peirce, C.S. 1955. The Scientific Attitude and Fallibilism. In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. J. Buchler, 42–59. New York: Dover Publications.
Steel, D. 2013. Acceptance, Values, and Inductive Risk. Philosophy of Science 80(5): 818–828.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaw, J. A rich resource on scientific knowledge. Metascience 29, 187–191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00500-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-020-00500-8