Skip to main content
Log in

Contractualism and Restrictions

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

T.M. Scanlon writes that deontological constraints on taking lives are to be defended “by considering what principles licensing others to take our lives could be reasonably rejected.” I argue that Scanlon can offer no such defence of deontological constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arneson, R. (2002): ‘The End of Welfare As We Know It? Scanlon Versus Welfarist Consequentialism’, Social Theory and Practice 28

  • Ashford, E. (2003): ‘The Demandingness of Scanlon’s Contractualism’, Ethics 113

  • Hurley, P. (1998): ‘Agent-Centered Restrictions: Clearing the Air of Paradox’, Ethics 108

  • Kamm F. (1996). Morality, Mortality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, F. (2002): ‘Owing, Justifying, and Rejecting’, Mind 111

  • Norcross, A. (2002): ‘Contractualism and Aggregation’, Social Theory and Practice 28

  • Otsuka, M. (2000): ‘Scanlon and the Claims of the Many Versus the One’, Analysis 60

  • Reibetanz, S. (1998): ‘Contractualism and Aggregation’, Ethics 108

  • Scanlon T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. (2000a): ‘Intention and Permissibility’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Suppl. vol. 74

  • Scanlon, T. (2000b): ‘A Contractualist Reply’, Theoria 66

  • Scanlon, T. (2002): ‘Replies’, Social Theory and Practice 28

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Shaver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaver, R. Contractualism and Restrictions. Philos Stud 132, 293–299 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-2219-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-2219-3

Keywords

Navigation