Piety = god-lovedness, then if a thing is loved by the gods because it is pious, then it is loved by the gods because it is god-loved, and if a thing is god-loved because it is loved by the gods, then it is pious because it is loved by the god' (10e9-11a3), to be based on some principle of substitutivity of identity or of definitional equivalents. I show that this is inadequate and mistaken, and that this premise (and the whole argument) should be viewed as based on a nascent theory of analysis and formal causation. I also show that socrates' argument if vitally different from and also much better than some superficially similar arguments in moore and hare about the definability of evaluative terms.
CITATION STYLE
Sharvy, R. (1972). Euthyphro 9d-11b: Analysis and Definition in Plato and Others. Noûs, 6(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.2307/2216144
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.