Skip to main content
Log in

Emedded Questions and ‘De Dicto’ Readings

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued, contra Beck and Rullmann (1999), and with Heim (1994), that the sources of strongly exhaustive interpretations and `de dicto' interpretations of wh-complements of veridical question-embedding verbs are one and the same. Beck and Rullmann's theory is shown to predict certain `de dicto' readings which do not exist, while a particular rendition of Heim's theory is shown to constrain the generation of `de dicto' readings in the correct way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, Sigrid and Hotze Rullmann: 1999, 'A Flexible Approach to Exhaustivity in Questions', Natural Language Semantics 7(3), 249-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Stephen: 1991, On the Semantics and Logical Form of Wh-Clauses, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Cresswell, Maxwell and Arnim von Stechow: 1982, 'De Re Belief Generalized', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 503-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, Anastasia: 1999, 'Affective Dependencies', Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 367-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1982, 'Semantic Analysis of Wh-Complements', Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2), 175-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Hamblin, C. L.: 1973, 'Questions in Montague English', Foundations of Language 10, 41-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1994, 'Interrogative Complements of Know', in R. Buchalla and A. Mittwoch (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Annual IATL Conference and of the 1993 IATL Workshop on Discourse, pp. 128-144. Akademon, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Malden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, R. 1993, 'Remarks on the Construction You Won't Believe Who Ed has Married', Lingua 91, 175-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri: 1977, 'Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1(1), 3-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, Utpal: 1991, Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed Them, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Lahiri, Utpal: 2002, Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percus, Orin: 2000, 'Constraints on Some Other Variable in Syntax', Natural Language Semantics 8(3), 173-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1997: 'Quantifier Scope: How Labor Is Divided between QR and Choice Functions', Linguistics and Philosophy 20(4), 335-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, Hotze and Sigrid Beck: 1998, 'Presupposition Projection and the Interpretation of Which-Questions', in D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 8, pp. 215-232. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvit, Yael and Sigrid Beck: 2001, 'Subquestions and Quantificational Variability Effects', in K. Megerdoomian and L.A. Bar-el (eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 20, pp. 510-523. Cascadilla Press, Somerville.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim: 1996, 'Against LF Pied Piping', Natural Language Semantics 4, 57-110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharvit, Y. Emedded Questions and ‘De Dicto’ Readings. Natural Language Semantics 10, 97–123 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016573907314

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016573907314

Keywords

Navigation