Skip to main content
Log in

Mate guarding and frequent in-pair copulation in humans

Concurrent or compensatory anti-cuckoldry tactics?

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cuckoldry is an adaptive problem faced by parentally investing males of socially monogamous species (e.g., humans and many avian species). Mate guarding and frequent in-pair copulation (IPC) may have evolved as anti-cuckoldry tactics in avian species and in humans. In some avian species, the tactics are used concurrently, with the result that mate guarding behaviors and IPC frequency are correlated positively. In other avian species, the tactics are compensatory, with the result that mate guarding behaviors and IPC frequency are correlated negatively. The relationship between mate guarding and IPC frequency in humans is unknown. Avian males that use these tactics concurrently share with human males an inability to guard a female partner continuously during her peak fertile period. We hypothesized, therefore, that men’s mate guarding and IPC frequency function as concurrent anti-cuckoldry tactics, resulting in a positive correlation between them. Study 1 (n=305) secured men’s self-reports of mate guarding and IPC frequency. Study 2 (n+367) secured women’s reports of their partners’ mate guarding and IPC frequency. The concurrent tactics hypothesis was supported in both studies: Men’s mate guarding and IPC frequency are correlated positively, and this association is not attributable to male age, female age, relationship satisfaction, relationship length, or time that the couple spends together. The Discussion section addresses potential limitations of this research and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonzo, S. H., and R. R. Warner 2000 Allocation to Mate Guarding or Increased Sperm Production in a Mediterranean Wrasse. American Naturalist 156:266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. R., and M. A. Bellis 1993 Human Sperm Competition: Ejaculate Adjustment by Males and the Function of Masturbation. Animal Behaviour 46:861–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1995 Human Sperm Competition. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R. 1979 Mate Guarding in the Magpie Pica pica. Animal Behaviour 30:277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller 1992 Sperm Competition in Birds. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R., L. Atkin, and A. P. Møller 1987 Copulation Behaviour of Birds. Behaviour 101:101–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broude, G. J., and S. J. Greene 1976 Cross-Cultural Codes on Twenty Sexual Attitudes and Practices. Ethnology 15:409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brylawski, A. M. Z., and L. A. Whittingham 2004 An Experimental Study of Mate Guarding and Paternity in House Wrens. Animal Behaviour 68:1417–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. 1988 From Vigilance to Violence: Tactics of Mate Retention in American Undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology 9:291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2003 The Evolution of Desire, revised ed. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., and T. K. Shackelford 1997 From Vigilance to Violence: Mate Retention Tactics in Married Couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:346–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, L. 2003 Does Quality of Marital Sex Decline with Duration? Archives of Sexual Behavior 32:55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., and P. Cohen 1983 Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., and Margo Wilson 1999 Human Evolutionary Psychology and Animal Behaviour. Animal Behaviour 57:509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J. L., and M. L. Leonard 1996 Mate Attendance and Copulatory Behaviour in Western Bluebirds: Evidence of Mate Guarding. Animal Behaviour 52:981–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., R. P. Dobash, K. Cavanagh, and R. Lewis 1998 Separate and Intersecting Realities: A Comparison of Men’s and Women’s Accounts of Violence against Women. Violence against Women 4:382–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G., R. L. Burch, M. L. Zappieri, R. A. Parvez, M. L. Stockwell, and J. A. Davis 2003 The Human Penis as a Semen Displacement Device. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., R. Thornhill, and C. E. Garver 2002 Changes in Women’s Sexual Interests and Their Partner’s Mate-Retention Tactics across the Menstrual Cycle: Evidence for Shifting Conflicts of Interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 269:975–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A. T., T. K. Shackelford, V. A. Weekes-Shackelford, H. A. Euler, S. Hoier, D. P. Schmitt, and C. W. LaMunyon 2005 Mate Retention, Semen Displacement, and Human Sperm Competition: A Preliminary Investigation of Tectics to Prevent and Correct Female Infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences 38:749–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyen, and A. A. Dhondt 1995 Mate Guarding and Copulation Behaviour in Monogamous and Polygynous Blue Tits: Do Males Do a Best-of-Bad-Job Strategy? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36:33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klusmann, D. 2002 Sexual Motivation and the Duration of Partnership. Archives of Sexual Behavior 31:275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimaki, E., K. Lahti, C. A. May, D. T. Parkin, G. B. Powell, P. Tolonen, and J. H. Wetton 1996 Copulatory Behaviour and Paternity Determined by DNA Fingerprinting in Kestrels: Effects of Cyclic Food Abundance. Animal Behaviour 51:945–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., J. H. Gagnon, R. T. Michael, and S. Michaels 1994 The Social Organization of Sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdol, L., T. E. Moffitt, A. Caspi, D. L. Newman, J. Fagan, and P. A. Silva 1997 Gender Differences in Partner Violence in a Birth Cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the Gap between Clinical and Epidemiological Approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65:68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, F., K. M. Cheng, and D. J. Bruggers 1984 Sperm Competition in Apparently Monogamous Birds. In Sperm Competition and Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed. Pp. 523–545. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P. 1985 Mixed Reproductive Strategy and Mate Guarding in a Semi-colonial Passerine, the Swallow Hirundo rustica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17:401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A. P., and T. R. Birkhead 1991 Frequent Copulations and Mate Guarding as Alternative Paternity Guards in Birds: A Comparative Study. Behaviour 118:170–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot, F., B. E. Arroyo, and V. Bretagnolle 2001 Decoy Presentations as a Means to Manipulate the Risk of Extrapair Copulation: An Experimental Study in a Semicolonial Raptor, the Montagu’s Harrier (Circus pygargus). Behavioral Ecology 12:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillsworth, E. G., M. G. Haselton, and D. M. Buss 2004 Ovulatory Shifts in Female Sexual Desire. Journal of Sex Research 41:55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., L. Alcalay, J. Allik, A. Angleiter, L. Ault, I. Austers, et al. 2004 Patterns and Universals of Mate Poaching across 53 Nations: The Effects of Sex, Culture, and Personality on Romantically Attracting Another Person’s Partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:560–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., and A. T. Goetz 2004 Men’s Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships: Development and Initial Validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale. Violence and Victims 19:21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., and G. J. LeBlanc 2001 Sperm Competition in Insects, Birds, and Humans: Insights from a Comparative Evolutionary Perspective. Evolution and Cognition 7:194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., A. T. Goetz, and D. M. Buss 2005 Mate Retention in Marriage: Further Evidence of the Reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences 39:415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., A. T. Goetz, D. M. Buss, H. A. Euler, and S. Hoier 2005 When We Hurt the Ones We Love: Predicting Violence against Women from Men’s Mate Retention. Personal Relationships 12:447–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., G. J. LeBlanc, V. A. Weekes-Shackelford, A. L. Bleske-Rechek, H. A. Euler, and S. Hoier 2002 Psychological Adaptation to Human Sperm Competition. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., N. Pound, and A. T. Goetz 2005 Psychological and Physiological Adaptation to Human Sperm Competition. Review of General Psychology 9:228–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K., N. Pound, A. T. Goetz, and C. W. LaMunyon 2005 Female Infidelity and Sperm Competition. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, D. M. Buss, ed. Pp. 372–393. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. W., R. C. Firman, G. Rhodes, and M. Peters 2004 Human Sperm Competition: Testis Size, Sperm Production, and Rates of Extrapair Copulations. Animal Behaviour 68:297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. 1984 Human Sperm Competition. In Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, R. L. Smith, ed. Pp. 601–660. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. 1979 The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, B. Campbell, ed., Pp. 139–179. London: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., and M. Daly 1992 The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Chattel. In The Adapted Mind, J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby, eds. Pp. 289–322. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd K. Shackelford.

Additional information

Todd K. Shackelford received his Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Texas at Austin in 1997. He is an associate professor of psychology at Florida Atlantic University, and chair of the Evolutionary Psychology Area. His current research interests include conflict between the sexes, particularly with regard to sexual behavior.

Aaron T. Goetz received his B.A. in psychology from the University of Texas at Austin in 2002 and his M.A. from Florida Atlantic University in 2005. He is a Ph.D. candidate in evolutionary psychology at Florida Atlantic University. His research interests include men’s anti-cuckoldry tactics and sexual coercion in intimate relationships.

David P. Schmitt received his Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1995. He is an associate professor of psychology at Bradley University, and founder and director of the International Sexuality Description Project, a cross-cultural collaboration that encompasses more than 100 scientists. His current research interests are at the interface of sexuality, personality, and evolutionary psychology.

Faith E. Guta received her B.A. in psychology from the University of West Florida in 2003, and her M.A. from Florida Atlantic University in 2005. Her research interests include human mate guarding and female sexuality.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shackelford, T.K., Goetz, A.T., Guta, F.E. et al. Mate guarding and frequent in-pair copulation in humans. Hum Nat 17, 239–252 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1007-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1007-x

Key words

Navigation