Skip to main content

Surrogacy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

Surrogacy is a promising treatment for infertility. It can potentially solve many intolerable difficulties that the infertile couples and their families face. Although initially frowned upon, evidence shows that the surrogacy arrangements are more acceptable now than when it was first introduced. Therefore, changes in the attitude in decision making about surrogacy can also be seen in some countries, but there are still indications of the degree of divergence between discourse and the actual practice of different forms of surrogacy around the world. Social, ethical and legal problems are subject to major debates and disagreements in natural or partial surrogacy or genetically unrelated full surrogacy. Genetic gestation surrogacy may largely free from social, legal and moral complications. It is a great choice of infertility treatment if the couple want their own genetic baby, but it still requires more thoughts and discussion. This chapter attempts to discuss the different notions related to surrogacy worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Inhorn, M. C., Razeghi-Nasrabad, H. B., & Toloo, G. (2008). The Iranian ART revolution: Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and third-party donation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 4(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S. (2006). Magical progeny, modern technology: A Hindu bioethics of assisted reproductive technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinsden, R. P. (2003). Gestational surrogacy. Human Reproduction Update, 9(5), 483–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C. (2006). Making Muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni versus Shi’a Islam. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 30, 427–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M. C., Patrizio, P., & Serour, G. I. (2010). Third-party reproductive assistance around the Mediterranean: Comparing Sunni Egypt, Catholic Italy and multisectarian Lebanon. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 21, 848–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, M., & az-Zubair, B. (2007). Who is a parent? Parenthood in Islamic ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 605–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, S. P. (2011). Infertility treatment in developing country. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numrich, P. D. (2009). The problem with sex according to Buddhism. Dialog, 48(1), 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ombelet, W. I. C., Silke, D., Serour, G. I., & Devroey, P. (2008). Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Human Reproduction Update, 14(6), 605–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez M. (2010). Surrogacy: the next frontier for reproductive justice. http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2010/02/23/surrogacy-next-frontier-reproductive-justice/. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.

  • Schenker, J. G. (1997). Infertility evaluation and treatment according to Jewish law. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 71, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svitnev K. (2006). Legal control of surrogacy – International perspectives. pp. 149–63. http://www.jurconsult.ru/publications/ethical_dillemas/13_Legal%20control%20of%20surrogacy%20-%20international%20perspectives.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2015.

  • WHO (World Health Organization). (2010). Mother or nothing: The agony of infertility. WHO Bulletin, 88(12), 881–882. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/en/index.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2014.

  • Zawawi M. (2012). Third party involvement in the reproductive process: Comparative aspects of the legal and ethical approaches to surrogacy. Eubios Ethics Institute. http://www.eubios.info/ABC4/abc4389.htm. Accessed 1 May 2015.

  • Zoloth, L., & Henning, A. A. (2010). Bioethics and oncofertility: Arguments and insights from religious traditions. Cancer Treatment and Research, 156, 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Fasouliotis, S. J., & Schenker, J. G. (1999). Social aspects of assisted reproduction. Human Reproductive Update, 5(1), 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, R. D. (2006). International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 871–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norhayati, H. A. (2003). Assisted reproduction – Islamic views on the science of procreation. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics, 13, 59–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utian, W. H., Sheean, L., & Goldfarb, J. M. (1985). Successful pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer from an infertile woman to a surrogate. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1351–1352.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shamima Parvin Lasker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lasker, S.P. (2016). Surrogacy. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_409

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics