Skip to main content

The Curious Case of the Conscious Corpse: A Medieval Buddhist Thought Experiment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reasons and Empty Persons: Mind, Metaphysics, and Morality

Abstract

One of the arguments that has been directed against the Buddhist anātman (“non-self”) theory, by Dan Zahavi among others, is that the doctrine cannot account for why we never mistake our own bodies for the bodies of others. This is not, however, a new objection; it can be found, for example, in a list of objections to the anātman doctrine in the Dazhidulun (“Treatise on the Great Perfection of Wisdom”), a medieval compendium attributed to Nāgārjuna and compiled and translated (and perhaps partially authored) by Kumārajīva in the early fifth century. The text offers several responses to this objection, the most interesting of which is the claim that there is indeed an instance of a person experiencing himself as another. We then hear the tale of a young man who went through a “body transplant”—his body is replaced, piece by piece, with that of a corpse. In my chapter, I analyze this amusing but nonetheless illuminating narrative, showing how the story is a classic example of a medieval Buddhist “thought experiment” (Gedankenspiel), which was freely altered by Buddhist authors as it was deployed in different doctrinal/philosophical contexts. I conclude with some reflections on how our approach to such didactic tales affects our understanding and appreciation of Buddhist philosophy writ large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that the critique of a singular and perduring self has a long history in the West that predates the intervention of cognitive science. Its modern philosophical articulation is associated closely with Derek Parfit (1984), whose analysis of self is often compared with that of the Buddhists.

  2. 2.

    There is a vast literature on the Buddhist anātman theory; for an insightful overview that includes a discussion of both the external (Nyāya) and internal (Pudgalavāda) critiques, see Kapstein (2001: 28–177), as well as the discussions in the chapters by Coseru and Ganeri in this volume.

  3. 3.

    A French translation can be found in Lamotte 1944–80: 2.735–750.

  4. 4.

    For a brief reflection on its philosophical import, see Ganeri (2007: 212–215), and Ganeri (2012:115–117).

  5. 5.

    See esp. the extended discussion in Lamotte 1944–80: 3.viii–xliv, who concludes that the original text likely dates to the early fourth century, as well as the convenient summary in Zacchetti (2015: 190–191).

  6. 6.

    On the various versions of the Aśokāvadāna see Deeg (2009: 12); Lamotte (1958: 261–272); Mukhopadhyaya (1963); Palumbo (2010: 20); Przyluski (1923); Strong (1983); and Wille (2000). Translations of the corpse-man tale from the Chinese versions can be found in Chavannes (1911:72–77); Li (1993: 164–165); Przyluski (1923: 381–382); and Strong (1992: 128–129).

  7. 7.

    Palumbo’s argument is based in part on (1) the dates for the dissemination of the Aśoka legend in China, which is not attested until the late fourth century; (2) the absence of any mention of the text in the more reliable Chu sanzang ji ji 出三藏記集 of 515; (3) the fact that the Lidai sanbao ji attribution appears to be drawn from a lost catalogue, the Jin shi zalu 晉世雜錄, which is itself a likely forgery; and (4) the translation terminology of the Ayuwang zhuan, which is typical of that which became standard only after the circulation of Kumārajīva’s translations in the early fifth century (Palumbo 2010: 20 n.31).

  8. 8.

    For a full discussion see esp. Strong (1992:118–144).

  9. 9.

    On the placing of the counting stick (śalākā) into the cave, which occurs whenever one of Upagupta’s disciples becomes an arhat, see Strong (1992: 141–143).

  10. 10.

    T.2043: 50.165b11-c2; cf. translation in Li (1993: 164–165).

  11. 11.

    See, for example, Mukhopadhyaya (1963: lx), and Strong (1983: 27).

  12. 12.

    Wille (2000). According to Sander (2000: 293–295), the fragments are written in a “Gilgit/Bamiyan Type 1” script, which would suggest a date of no later than the seventh century.

  13. 13.

    Fausbøll 1877: 261–268 (jātaka 51 and its commentary); translation in Chalmers (1895: 128–133). There is some evidence that portions of this story, specifically the incident with the jackals, may be related to northern European folklore (Tawney 1883: 120–121). My thanks to Sean Kerr for bringing this jātaka to my attention.

  14. 14.

    The best known version of the story is found in the twelfth book of the Kathāsaritsāgara compiled by Somadeva in the eleventh century; see the translation in Tawney (1880–84: 2:261–264). The tale was borrowed by Thomas Mann for his 1940 novella “Die vertauschten Köpfe.” Mann’s story, which is set in India, is dedicated to the Indologist Heinrich Zimmer, through whose writings Mann was introduced to the tale. The head-swapping story then returns to India via the play Hayavadana (1971) by the contemporary South Indian playwright Girish Karnad, who knew the story through Mann’s adaptation (Mahadevan 2002). Thanks to Phyllis Granoff for this reference.

  15. 15.

    The use of teleportation in philosophical discussions of identity became popular following the discussion in Parfit (1984: 197 ff.), although he was not the first to come up with the idea. In Parfit’s version, a person travels to Mars via a machine on Earth that scans the traveler’s atomic makeup and relays the information to a machine on Mars that instantly produces an exact replica. Meanwhile, back on Earth, the scanner kills the original person. There are many variants, including ones in which the original is not killed. (Extended discussions of Parfit’s theory can be found in the chapters by Coseru and Ganeri in this volume.) See also Daniel Dennett (1978), who relates an amusing tale in which his brain is removed from his body and placed in a vat; his brain remains connected to his body via radio transmitters, but when his original body is accidentally destroyed it is replaced with that of another.

  16. 16.

    The conceptual quandary is akin to that explored in the “rubber-hand illusion” (Botvinick and Cohen 1998; Tsakiris and Haggard 2005), and “full-body illusion” (Lenggenhager et al. 2007; Blanke and Metzinger 2009). In both cases, a clever experimental setup is used to induce subjects to identify or locate themselves within a surrogate body (or body part) that lies at some remove from their physical bodies.

  17. 17.

    T.208: 4.531c25-532a17; cf. Chavannes (1911: 72–74). Little is known about this collection or its compiler, but it is based on materials translated by Kumārajīva. See the discussions in Chavannes (1911: 1–3); Sugiyama (1992); and Yost (2013).

  18. 18.

    T.2121: 53.92c22-93a5 and 241a23-b9.

References

  • Blanke, Olaf, and Thomas Metzinger. 2009. Full-Body Illusions and Minimal Phenomenal Selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (1): 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Maurice. 1917. On the Art of Entering Another’s Body: A Hindu Fiction Motif. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge (April 13, 1916), 56 (1): 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, Matthew, and Jonathan Cohen. 1998. Rubber Hands ‘Feel’ Touch that Eyes See. Nature 391 (6669): 756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, Robert. 1895. The Jātaka or Stories of the Buddha’s Former Births. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavannes, Édouard. 1911. Cinq Cents Contes Et Apologues: Extraits Du Tripitaka Chinois Et Traduits En Français. Vol. 2. Paris: Ernest Leroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeg, Max. 2009. From the Iron-Wheel to Bodhisattvahood: Aśoka in Buddhist Culture and Memory. In Aśoka: In History and Historical Memory, ed. Patrick Olivelle, 109–144. Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel C. 1978. Where Am I? In Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, 310–323. Montgomery: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeri, Jonardon. 2007. The Concealed Art of the Soul: Theories of Self and Practices of Truth in Indian Ethics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Self: Naturalism, Consciousness, and the First-Person Stance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, Matthew T. 2001. Reason’s Traces: Identity and Interpretation in Indian and Tibetan Buddhist Thought. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritzer, Robert. 2000. Rūpa and the Antarābhava. Journal of Indian Philosophy 28 (3): 235–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamotte, Étienne. 1944-1980. Le Traits de La Grand Vertu de Sagesse de Nāgārjuna (Mahāprajñāpāramitāsāstra). Vol. 5. Louvain: Institut Orientaliste.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1958. Histoire du Bouddhisme Indien. Des Origines à Lʼère Śaka. Louvain: Institut Orientaliste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenggenhager, Bigna, Tej Tadi, Thomas Metzinger, and Olaf Blanke. 2007. Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness. Science 317 (5841): 1096–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Rongxi. 1993. The Biographical Scripture of King Aśoka. Berkeley: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Donald S. 2008. Buddhism & Science: A Guide for the Perplexed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Scientific Buddha: His Short and Happy Life, The Dwight Harrington Terry Foundation Lectures on Religion in the Light of Science and Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan, Anand. 2002. Switching Heads and Cultures: Transformation of an Indian Myth by Thomas Mann and Girish Karnad. Comparative Literature 54 (1): 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyaya, Sujitkumar. 1963. The Aśokāvadāna. Sanskrit Text Compared with Chinese Versions. Delhi: Sahitya Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, Antonello. 2010. From Constantine the Great to Emperor Wu of the Liang: The Rhetoric of Imperial Conversion and the Divisive Emergence of Religious Identities in Late Antique Eurasia. Paper Presented at the Mellon Foundation Sawyer Seminar Conversion in Late Antiquity: Christianity, Islam, and Beyond. University of Oxford, Corpus Christi College, 16 January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przyluski, Jean. 1923. La légende de I’Empereur Açoka (Açoka-avadāna) dans les textes indiens et chinois. Paris: Paul Geuthner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, Lore. 2000. A Brief Paleographical Analysis of the Brāhmī Scripts in Volume 1. In Buddhist Manuscripts Volume I, Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection I, ed. Jens Braarvig, 285–300. Oslo: Hermes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharf, Robert H. 2014. Is Nirvāṇa the Same as Insentience? Chinese Struggles with an Indian Buddhist Ideal. In India in the Chinese Imagination: Myth, Religion, and Thought, ed. John Kieschnick and Meir Shahar, 141–170. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Knowing Blue: Early Buddhist Accounts of Non-Conceptual Sense Perception. Philosophy East and West 63 (3): 826–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, Mark, Evan Thompson, and Dan Zahavi, eds. 2011. Self, No Self?: Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, John S. 1983. The Legend of King Aśoka: A Study and Translation of the Aśokāvadāna. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. The Legend and Cult of Upagupta: Sanskrit Buddhism in North India and Southeast Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryūshō, Sugiyama 杉山龍清. 1992. 『衆経撰雑譬喩』と『大智度論』との関係について [A Study of the Zhongjing zhuanza piyu and the Da zhidu lun.] Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 40 (2): 584–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, Charles Henry. 1880–84. The Kathá Sarit Ságara; or, Ocean of the Streams of Story. Vol. 2. Calcutta: J. W. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1883. Indian Folklore Notes from the Pali Jātakas and the Kathā Sarit Sāgara. Journal of Philology 12 (23): 112–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris, Manos, and Patrick Haggard. 2005. The Rubber Hand Illusion Revisited: Visuotactile Integration and Self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (1): 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (A revised edition was published in 2017.).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wille, Klaus. 2000. Fragments from the Aśoka legend. In Buddhist Manuscripts Volume I, Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection I, ed. Jens Braarvig, 219–231. Oslo: Hermes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, Tyson Joseph. 2013. Anthologizing Buddhists: A Study of Avadāna Narratives and the Communities that Read Them in Early Medieval China. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacchetti, Stefano. 2015. Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras. In Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism, ed. Jonathan A. Silk, vol. 1, 171–209. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Dan. 2011. The Experiential Self: Objections and Clarifications. In Self, No Self?: Perspectives From Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian Traditions, ed. Mark Siderits, Evan Thompson, and Dan Zahavi, 56–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this paper were delivered at the Institut für Indologie und Tibetologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (May 16-18, 2012), at the K.J. Somaiya Centre For Buddhist Studies, University of Mumbai (7th Biennial International Conference on “Cross-Cultural Transmission of Buddhist Texts: Translation, Transliteration and Critical Edition,” December 5-7, 2012), and at National Taiwan University, Taipei (5th International Sheng Yen Education Foundation Conference, June 29, 2014). I would like to thank the organizers of those events, as well as Christian Coseru, Phyllis Granoff, Sean Kerr, Nir Feinberg, Alexander von Rospatt, Elizabeth Horton Sharf, and Evan Thompson for their invaluable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert H. Sharf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharf, R.H. (2023). The Curious Case of the Conscious Corpse: A Medieval Buddhist Thought Experiment. In: Coseru, C. (eds) Reasons and Empty Persons: Mind, Metaphysics, and Morality. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13995-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics