skip to main content
article

Two Dogmas of Computationalism

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 1997Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper challenges two orthodox theses: (a) that computational processes must be algorithmic; and (b) that all computed functions must be Turing-computable. Section 2 advances the claim that the works in computability theory, including Turing‘s analysis of the effective computable functions, do not substantiate the two theses. It is then shown (Section 3) that we can describe a system that computes a number-theoretic function which is not Turing-computable. The argument against the first thesis proceeds in two stages. It is first shown (Section 4) that whether a process is algorithmic depends on the way we describe the process. It is then argued (Section 5) that systems compute even if their processes are not described as algorithmic. The paper concludes with a suggestion for a semantic approach to computation.

References

  1. Amit, D. (1989), Modeling Brain Function, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, N. and Fodor, J.A. (1972), 'Cognitivism and the Analog/Digital Distinction', unpublished manuscript.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Church, A. (1936a), 'An Unsolvable Problem of Elementary Number Theory', Am. J. Math., 58 pp. 345-363. Reprinted in Davis (1965), pp. 88-107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Church, A. (1936b), 'A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem', Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1, pp. 40-41. Reprinted in Davis (1965), pp. 108-115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Churchland, P.S. and Sejnowski, T. (1992), The Computational Brain, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cleland, C. (1993), 'Is the Church-Turing Thesis True?', Minds and Machines, 3, 283-312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cummins, R. (1989), Meaning and Mental Represenation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins R. and Schwarz G. (1991), 'Connectionism, Computation, and Cognition', in Horgan, T. and Tienson, J. (eds.), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 60-73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, M. (ed.) (1965), The Undecidable: Basic Papers on Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Problems and Computable Functions, New-York: Raven. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Demopoulos, W. (1987), 'On Some Fundamental Distinctions of Computationalism', Synthese, 70, pp. 79-96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dietrich, E. (1990), 'Computationalism', Social Epistemology, 4, pp. 135-154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Earman, J. (1986), A Primer for Determinism, Holland: D. Reidel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fetzer, J.H. (1994), 'Mental Algorithms: Are Minds Computational Systems?', Pragmatics and Cognition, 2, pp. 1-29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gandy, R.O. (1980), 'Church's Thesis and Principles of Mechanisms', in Barwise J., Keisler J.J. and Kunen K. (eds.), The Kleene Symposium, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 123-145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gandy R.O. (1988), 'The Confluence of Ideas in 1936', in Herken, R. (1988), pp. 55-111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gödel, K. (1931), 'Uber formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I', J. Monast. Math. Ph., 38, pp. 173-198. Translated and reprinted in Davis (1965), pp. 4-38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gödel, K. (1946), 'Remarks before the Princeton Bicentennial Conference on Problems in Mathematics', Reprinted in Davis (1965), pp. 84-88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Goel, V. (1991), 'Notationality and the Information-Processing Mind', Minds and Machines, 1, pp. 129-165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Goodman, N. (1968), Languages of Art, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Grzegorczyk, A. (1955), 'Computable Functionals', Fund. Math., 42, pp. 168-202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Grzegorczyk, A. (1957), 'On the Definitions of Computable Real Continuous Functions', Fund. Math., 44, pp. 61-71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Haugeland, J. (1981), 'Analog and Analog', Philosophical Topics, 12, pp. 213-225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Herken, R. (ed.) (1988), The Universal Turing-Machine, A Half-Century Survey, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hilbert, D. and Ackermann, W. (1928), Grundzuge der Theoretischen Logic, Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hopfield, J.J. (1982), 'Neural Networks and Physical Systems with Emergent Collective Computational Abilities', Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 79, pp. 2554-2556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kleene, S.C. (1936a), 'General Recursive Functions of Natural Numbers', Math. Annal., 112, pp. 727-742. Reprinted in Davis (1965), pp. 236-253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kleene, S.C. (1936b), '¿-definability and Recursiveness', Duke Math. J., 2, pp. 340-353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kleene, S.C. (1988), 'Turing's Analysis of Computability, and Major Applications of It', in Herken (1988), pp. 17-54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lewis, D. (1971), 'Analog and Digital', Noûs, 5, pp. 321-327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Morris, P., (1991), 'On the Density of Solutions in Equilibrium Points for the N-Queens Problem', Technical Note TR-M 91-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Penrose, R.; (1989), The Emperor's New Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Penrose, R. (1994), Shadows of the Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Pitowsky, I. (1990), 'The Physical Church Thesis and Physical Computational Complexity', lyuum, A Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly, 39, pp. 81-99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Post, E.L. (1936), 'Finite Combinatory Processes - Formulation I', Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1, pp. 103-105. Reprinted in Davis (1965), pp. 288-291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Pour-El, M.B. (1974), 'Abstract Computability and its Relation to the General Purpose Analog Computer', Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 199, pp, 1-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Pour-El, M.B. and Caldwell, J. (1975), 'On a Simple Definitions of Computable Functions of a Real Variable with Applications to Functions of a Complex Variable', Z. Math. Logik. Grundlagen Math., 21, pp. 1-19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Pour-El, M.B. and Richards, I. (1981), 'The Wave Equation with Computable Initial Data such that its Unique Solution is not Computable'. Adv. in Math., 39, pp. 215-239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1984), Computation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Shagrir, O., (1992), 'A Neural Net with SelfInhibiting Units for the N-Queens Problem', International Journal of Neural Systems, 3, 349-352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Shapiro, S. (1983), 'Remarks on the Development of Computability', History and Philosophy of Logic, 4, pp. 203-220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sieg, W. (1994), 'Mechanical Procedures and Mathematical Experience', in George, A. (ed.), Mathematics and Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71-114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Sosic, R. and Gu, J., (1990), 'A Polynomial Time Algorithm for the N-Queens Problem', SIGART Bulletin, 1, pp. 7-11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Sosic, R. and Gu, J., (1991), '3,000,000 Queens in Less Than One Minute', SIGART Bulletin, 2, pp. 22-24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Turing, A.M. (1936-7), 'On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem', P. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 42 (1936), pp. 230-265. plus a correction, ibid., 43 (1937), pp. 544-546. Reprinted in Davis (1965), pp. 115-154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Turing, A. (1950), 'Computing, Machinery, and Intelligence', Mind, 59, 433-460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. van Heijenoort, J., (1967), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879-1931, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access