Skip to main content
Log in

Daxue: The Great Learning for Universities Today

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The so-called daxue zhi dao 大學之道 (the Dao of great learning), though a Confucian way of self-cultivation, can inspire contemporary universities (daxue 大學) through a process of creative interpretation. Having examined the ethos of modern university in its four historical stages, I come up with its last stage of reaching out in the era of globalization and dialogue among civilizations, in which we have to rethink the idea of university from the fuller development of human reason. This can be achieved only through increasingly reaching out toward many others by means of mutual waitui 外推 (strangification) and self-reflection, which presuppose and announce an ethics of generosity in priority over and implementable by reciprocity. Universities today should learn from classical Confucianism, and we should keep in mind their initial generous spirit as exemplified by Confucius himself. Strangification and self-reflection, being moved by original generosity and implemented by reciprocity, will eventually bring us the hope of reason.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, T. Roger, and Henry Rosemont, Jr. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Pub. Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. and comp. 1973. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1974. Theory and Practice. Trans. by J. Viertel. London: Heinemann.

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1970. Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

  • Ladrière, Jean. 2004. La foi chrétienne et le Destin de la raison. Paris: Les Editions du Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laozi, Four Versions of the 老子四種. 1999. Taipei 台北: Da’an 大安.

  • Lau, D. C., trans. 1970. Mencius. New York: Penguin Classics.

  • ______., trans. 1979. Confucius: The Analecs. London: Penguin Books.

  • Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1979. La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, Marcel. 1968. Essai sur le don, in Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Vincent 沈清松. 2002. Contrast, Strangification, and Dialogue 對比、外推與交談. Taipei 台北: Wunan 五南.

  • ______. 2004. “A Book Review of Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri’s Empire.Universitas: Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture 361: 109–112.

  • von Humbolt, Wilhem. 1979. Sur l’organisation interne et externe des établissements scientifiques supérieurs à Berlin, trans. by André Laks, in Philosophie de l’université. Paris: Payot.

  • Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1983. Collected Commentaries on Chapters and Sentences of the Four Books 四書章句集注. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • ______. 1994. Classified Conversations of Z hu Xi 朱子語類, vol. 7. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Zhuangzi, The 莊子. 1983. Taipei 台北: Yiwen 藝文.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, V. Daxue: The Great Learning for Universities Today. Dao 17, 13–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9586-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9586-2

Keywords

Navigation