Skip to main content

How the Pañcakośa Model of Experience Fits the Understanding of Śūnya and Helps Explain Quantum Reality?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum Reality and Theory of Śūnya

Abstract

The Vedic system explains the structure of human subjectivity through the idea that human experience is based on various properties and levels of the mind with separate abilities and roles to play in the human makeup, namely, Manas, Buddhi, Ahamkāra, and the Citta that constitutes the underlying driving force. These are regarded as linked to various independent vehicles for conscious experience that exist apart from the gross physical body and which are open to the cognition and action of yogis whose abilities have developed through prolonged practice of deep meditation. Subtle bodies go under the general classification of Sukṣma and Kāraṇa Śariras. The Manomaya and Vijñānamaya Kośa are generally translated as “subtle” (Sukṣma), while the Anandmay kosha is considered “causal” (Kāraṇa).

The paper will discuss that these bodies function on a kind of information different from that of gross senses – physical, digital/entropy information – and point to a different kind of reality prevailing at subtle levels of experience. In particular, the information types can be classified through the approach of Śikṣa, which states that there are four levels of verbal expression, physical through sound, mental, ideational, and transcendental. These correspond to digital information; experience information; integrated, higher-order experience information; and totality information. Only quantum reality and its extensions can model these, and only yoga, in the fullest sense of the word as the eight-limbed practice of Aṣtāṅgayoga as propounded by Maharishi Patanjali, or its equivalents such as Islam’s Chist, can provide subjective confirmation of the existence of these states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Swami Madhavananda, Swaroopyog, Pune, personal training & private communication on Science of Meditation, in Natha Sampradaya.

References

  1. Patanjali M. Yoga Sūtras (Shearer A. Trans. Effortless being). The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali. London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Isvarakrsna, (Thomas H. Tran.) SankhyaKarika. Philadelphia: Wentworth; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jung CG. The collected works of C.G. Jung: psychology and religion. New York: Pantheon Books, U. Minnesota; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss E. Sigmund Freud as a consultant – recollections of a pioneer in psychoanalysis. New York: Transaction Publishers; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Selye H. The stress of life. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hansen GR, Strelzer J. The psychology of pain. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2005;23:339–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lomranz J, Mostofsky DI. The psychology of pain and suffering. New York: Springer; 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagarkar M. Gitagyanyoga – The Yoga of Knowledge. Adhyaya 2, Sat BuddhiYog (Sankhyayog). Pune: SwaroopyogPratishthan; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ādi Śankarācārya (Chinmayananda S. trans) Atmabodha. Mumbai: ChinmayaPrakashan; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Radhakrishnan S. Principal Upaniṣhads. New Delhi: Harper Collins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ādi Śankarācārya (Dayananda Saraswati S. Tr & Comment) Tattvabodhah. Chapter 8, p. 112. Chennai: ArshaVidya; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mundaka Upaniṣhad in Radhakrishnan S. Principal Upaniṣhads. New Delhi: Harper Collins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patanjali M. Yoga Sūtras II.54 (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Isvarakrsna HT. SankhyaKarika. Philadelphia: Wentworth Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nagarkar M. ParamAmrutChintanYog process for supreme knowledge of Swarupa. Pune: SwaroopyogPratishthan; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ādi Śankarācārya (Chinmayananda S. trans) Atmabodha. Mumbai: ChinmayaPrakashan; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wasserman T, Wasserman LD. Depathologising psychopathology: the neuroscience of mental illness and its treatment. New York: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Damasio A, Damasio H, Tranel D. Persistence of feelings and sentience after bilateral damage of the insula. Cereb Cortex. 2012; Apr 3:bhs077

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taittriya Upaniṣhad I.1-3 in Radhakrishnan S. Principal Upaniṣhads. New Delhi: Harper Collins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagarkar M. Gitagyanyoga – The Yoga of Knowledge. Adhyaya 17, Sat BuddhiYog (Sankhyayog). Pune: SwaroopyogPratishthan; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yogi MM. Science of being and art of living: transcendental meditation. New York: Plume; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Patanjali M. Yoga Sūtras Ch.II.29 (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nagarkar M. Science of meditation, Dhyanayog. Pune: SwaroopyogPratishthan; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Books LLC (ed). Branches of Buddhism: Hinayana, Pragmatic Buddhism, Schools of Buddhism, Buddhist Modernism, Southern, Eastern and Northern Buddhism. General Books LLC; 2010

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patanjali M. Yoga SūtrasI.2 (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen RA. The neuropsychology of attention. New York: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vivekananda S. Chapter 2 in Raja Yoga – the yoga of knowledge. AdvaitaAshrama, H.P.; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. Inaugural article: a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(2):676–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yogi MM. Science of being and art of living: transcendental meditation. New York: Plume; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Damasio A. Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. New York: Barnes and Noble; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Northoff G, Heinzel A, de Greck M, Bermpohl F, Dobrowolny H, Panksepp J. Self referential processing in our brain – a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. Neuroimage. 2006;31:440–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Patanjali M. Yoga SūtrasI.3 (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Madhavananda S. SanskarPradipika (Slokas from Gyaneshwari) 1.1 SwaroopyogaPratishthan, Pune; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nargarkar M. The divine touch, selected Abhanagas of SantTukaram, Chap 4, pp 106–108. Pune: SwaroopyogPratishthan; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Travis F, Arenander A. Cross-sectional and longitudinal study of effects of transcendental meditation practice on interhemispheric frontal asymmetry and frontal coherence. Int J Neurosci. 2006;116(12):1519–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abdul Kalam APJ, Tiwari A. Wings of fire – an autobiography. Hyderabad. Highest accomplishments: Universities Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shetkar R, Hankey A. Optimizing emotional intelligence in management education: a role for vedic sciences, Nitte Management Review (NMR); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mandukya Upaniṣhad, Ch.1, Verse 3-7, in Radhakrishnan S. Principal Upaniṣhads. New Delhi: Harper Collins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fell J, Elger CE, Kurthen M. Do neural correlates of consciousness cause conscious states? Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(2):367–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ādi Śankarācārya (Dayananda Saraswati S. Tr & Comment) Tattvabodhah. Chapter 8, p. 112. Chennai: ArshaVidya; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yogananda P. Autobiography of a Yogi. Kolkata: YogodaSatsangaSoc India; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Venkatesananda S. The concise Yoga Vasishtha. Albany: SUNY Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nagarkar M (2012c) Gitagyanyoga – The Yoga of Knowledge. Adhyaya 13, Sat BuddhiYog (Sankhyayog). SwaroopyogPratishthan, Pune.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Olivelle P. Upanisads, Taittiriya Upaniṣhad Cha.1, Verse 1, Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. ISBN:978-0-19-954025-9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Husserl E. The phenomenology of internal time consciousness. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hankey A. Complexity biology-based information structures can explain subjectivity, objective reduction of wave packets, and non-computability. Cosmos Hist J Nat Soc Philos. 2014;10(1):237–50.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hankey A. A complexity basis for phenomenology: how information states at criticality offer a new approach to understanding experience of self, being and time. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2015;119(3):288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Patanjali M. Yoga SūtrasCh.I.47 (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Patanjali M. Yoga SūtrasCh.III (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Potter KH. Nāgārjuna and Madhyamika Buddhism (from Presuppositions of India’s Philosophies). Conn: Westport; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Taittriya Upaniṣhad I.1 in Radhakrishnan S. Principal Upaniṣhads. New Delhi: Harper Collins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Brihadaranyaka Upaniṣhad (5.1.1), in Radhakrishnan S. Principal Upaniṣhads. New Delhi: Harper Collins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mundaka Upaniṣhad (3.1) in Radhakrishnan S. Principal Upaniṣhads. New Delhi: Harper Collins; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Carsetti A. Functional models of cognition, self-organizing dynamics and semantic structure in cognitive systems. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Patanjali M. Yoga SūtrasIII.4 – 6 (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Patanjali M. Yoga SūtrasCh.III (Shearer A. Trans. The Yoga Sūtras of Patanjali). London: Crown Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Venkatramiah M. Talks with Sri Ramana Maharishi. 13th ed. Tiruvanamalai: Sri Ramanasramam; 2013. p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sri Sankara’sVivekachudamani, (Trans. Acharya Pranipata Chaitanya), Chinmaya Mission, India.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sri Jnanadeva’sGita BhavarthaDipika – Jnaneshwari (Trans. M.R.Yardi), BharatiyaVidyaBhavan; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Damasio A. Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain. New York: Barnes and Noble; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Shetkar R. Hankey A, Nagendra HR. Biophysics of meditation. Submitted to the Journal of Consciousness Studies; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K. Self-organized criticality: an explanation of the 1/f noise. Phys Rev Lett. 1987;59:381–4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Shetkar R, Hankey A, Nagendra HR. Reason for health benefits of deep meditation: self organized criticality restores regulation to optimal. Eur J Pharm Med R (EJPMR). 2016; 3(5):435–41.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Shetkar R, Hankey A Nagendra HR. First person accounts of Yoga meditation yield clues to the nature of information in experience. Cosmos Hist. 2017;13(1):240–52.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hankey A, Shetkar R. Self-transcending meditation is good for mental health: why this should be the case. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28:236–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shetkar, R.M., Hankey, A., Nagendra, H.R. (2019). How the Pañcakośa Model of Experience Fits the Understanding of Śūnya and Helps Explain Quantum Reality?. In: Bhatt, S.R. (eds) Quantum Reality and Theory of Śūnya. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1957-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics