Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 4, 2007

Symbol-intertextuality-deconstruction (on the dialectic of stability and variability of concept and symbol)

  • Helen V Shelestiuk

    Her research interests include linguistics, semiotics, and psycholinguistics. Her recent publications include ‘Semantics of ymbol’ (2003); ‘Metonymy as a tool of cognition and representation: A natural language analysis’ (2005); ‘Methods, types and techniques of persuasion and suggestion: Linguistic perspective’ (2006); and ‘Approaches to metaphor: Structure, classifications, cognate phenomena’ (2006).

    EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

This article probes the essence of such phenomena as concept and symbol, considers the dialectic of their stability and variability, and traces the development of content in some of them. Archetypes, stereotypes, and conceptual values are identified as the entities that are responsible for the universality of concepts and symbols, and that provide the stable ‘kernels’ of their content, which resist changes happening in them over time. Finally, the article expands on the main factors bringing about these changes — intertextuality and deconstruction, and offers a case study of the deconstruction of the Soviet ideological model during the ‘Perestroika’ of the 1990s.

About the author

Helen V Shelestiuk

Her research interests include linguistics, semiotics, and psycholinguistics. Her recent publications include ‘Semantics of ymbol’ (2003); ‘Metonymy as a tool of cognition and representation: A natural language analysis’ (2005); ‘Methods, types and techniques of persuasion and suggestion: Linguistic perspective’ (2006); and ‘Approaches to metaphor: Structure, classifications, cognate phenomena’ (2006).

Published Online: 2007-12-04
Published in Print: 2007-11-20

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 1.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/SEM.2007.078/html
Scroll to top button