Skip to main content
Log in

Agriculture, ethics, and restrictions on property rights

  • Published:
Journal of agricultural ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The argument in this essay is twofold. (1) Procedural justice requires,in particular cases, that we restrict property rights in natural resources, e.g., California agricultural land or Appalachian coal land. (2) Conditions imposed by Locke's political theory and by dense population require,in general, that we restrict property rights in finite or non-renewable natural resources such as land. If these arguments are correct, then we have a moral imperative to use land-use controls (such as taxation, planning, zoning, and acreage limitations) to restructure land ownership and land use in a far more radical way than has ever been accomplished in the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shrader-Frechette, K.S. Agriculture, ethics, and restrictions on property rights. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 1, 21–40 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02014460

Keywords

Navigation