Skip to main content
Log in

Biodiversity, biological uncertainty, and setting conservation priorities

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a world of massive extinctions where not all taxa can be saved, how ought biologists to decide their preservation priorities? When biologists make recommendations regarding conservation, should their analyses be based on scientific criteria, on public or lay criteria, on economic or some other criteria? As a first step in answering this question, we examine the issue of whether biologists ought to try to save the endangered Florida panther, a well known “glamour” taxon. To evaluate the merits of panther preservation, we examine three important arguments of biologists who are skeptical about the desirability of panther preservation. These arguments are (1) that conservation dollars ought to be spent in more efficient ways than panther preservation; (2) that biologists and conservationists ought to work to preserve species before subspecies; and (3) that biologists and conservationists ought to work to save habitats before species or subspecies. We conclude that, although all three arguments are persuasive, none of them provides convincing grounds for foregoing panther preservation in favor of other, more scientifically significant conservation efforts. Our conclusion is based, in part, on the argument that biologists ought to employ ethical, as well as scientific, rationality in setting conservation priorities and that ethical rationality may provide persuasive grounds for preserving taxa that often are not viewed by biologists as of great importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballou, J.D., T.J. Foose, R.C. Lacy, and U.S. Seal: 1989,Florida Panther Population Viability Analysis and Recommendations, Captive Breeding Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Apple Valley, MN (12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, 55128, tel. (612) 431-9325).

  • Belden, R.C.: 1987, ‘Florida Panther Recovery Plan Implementation — A 1983 Progress Report’, in S.D. Miller and D.D. Everett (eds.),Cats of the World: Biology, Conservation and Management, National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, pp. 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolgiano, C.: 1991, ‘Concepts of Cougar’,Wilderness 54, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G.M., Jr.: 1990, ‘Valuation of Genetic Resources’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W. E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 203–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R.L., and S.R. Humphrey: 1987, ‘Rarity as a Criterion for Endangerment in Florida's Fauna’,Oryx 21, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L.K., and K.S. Shrader-Frechette: 1993,Policy for Land: Ethics and Law, Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinvaux, P.A.: 1978,Why Big Fierce Animals are Rare: an Ecologist's Perspective, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristoffer, C., and J. Eisenberg: 1985,On the Captive Breeding and Reintroduction of the Florida Panther in Suitable Habitats, unpublished report.

  • Dasgupta, P.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, K.R.: 1982, ‘Mountain Lion (Felis concolor)’, in J.A. Chapman and G.A. Feldhamer (eds.),Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Economics, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 711–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, M.: 1987,Floridians and Wildlife, Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 2, Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.

  • Dworkin, R.: 1977,Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J.: 1989, ‘Statement’, in ‘Minutes’, in Ballouet al., Florida Panther Population Viability Analysis and Recommendations, Captive Breeding Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Apple Valley, MN (12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, 55128, tel. (612) 431-9325).

  • Fernald, R.T.: 1989,Coastal Xeric Scrub Communities of the Treasure Coast Region, Florida: A Summary of Their Distribution and Ecology, with Guidelines for Their Preservation and Management, Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 6, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J., and N. Myers: 1986, ‘What We Must Do to Save Wildlife’,International Wildlife 16, No. 3, 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, K.: 1987, ‘Endangered Species: Where to From Here?’,American Forests 93, Nos. 11, 12, pp. 57, 58, 60, 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, K.: 1990, ‘WWF Works to Save Asia's Large Mammals’,Focus 12, No. 1, pp. 1, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, E.A.: 1946, ‘Classification of the Races of the Puma’, in S.P. Young and E.A. Goldman (eds.),The Puma, Mysterious American Cat, National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, pp. 177–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.H.: 1990, ‘The Prospects for Using Market Incentives for Conservation of Biological Diversity’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 246–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D.: 1987, ‘The Demography of Chance Extinction’, in M.E. Soulé (ed.),Viable Populations for Conservation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J.: 1990, ‘The Golden Rule — a Proper Scale for Our Environmental Crisis’,Natural History 9, 34–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., R. Mendelsohn, and T. Moore: 1989, ‘Measuring the Benefits of Endangered Species Preservation: From Research to Policy’,Journal of Environmental Management 29, 399–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.R.: 1981,The Mammals of North America, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W.M.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I.: 1989, ‘Metapopulation Dynamics: Does It Help to Have More of the Same?’,Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L.D., and P.B. Gallagher: 1989, ‘New Initiatives for Wildlife Conservation: The Need for Movement Corridors’, in G. MacKintosh (ed.),Preserving Communities and Corridors, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, pp. 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvell, D.: 1990, ‘Summary of the Discussion’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irland, L.C.: 1976, ‘Determining the Value of Forests to Communities and the General Public: The Case of Southern Bottomland Hardwoods’, in A.C. Main (ed.),25th Annual Forestry Symposium: Economics of Southern Forest Resources Management, School of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Division of Continuing Education, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, pp. 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.N.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 264–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laikre, L., and N. Ryman: 1991, ‘Inbreeding Depression in a Captive Wolf (Canis lupus) Population’,Conservation Biology 5, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J.: 1960,Two Treatises of Government, University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maehr, D.S.: 1990, ‘The Florida Panther and Private Lands’,Conservation Biology 4, 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maehr, D.S., R.C. Belden, E.D. Land, and L. Wilkins: 1990, ‘Food Habits of Panthers in Southwest Florida’,Journal of Wildlife Management 54, 429–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, R.: 1985, ‘Population Status of the Florida Panther in the Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve’, unpublished report, Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve.

  • McCoy, E.D., and H.R. Mushinsky: 1992, ‘Rarity of Organisms in the Sand Pine Scrub Habitat of Florida’,Conservation Biology, in press.

  • McNab, B.K.: 1963, ‘Bioenergetics and the Determination of Home Range Size’,American Naturalist 97, 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W.D., W.G. Van Name, and D. Quinn: 1929,A Crisis in Conservation: Serious Danger of Extinction of Many North American Birds, published by the Authors, New York.

  • Noll, R.G.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G.: 1988, ‘Avoiding the Triage Question’,Endangered Species Update 5, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F., and L.D. Harris: 1986, ‘Nodes, Networks, and MUMs: Preserving Diversity at All Scales’,Environmental Management 10, 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F.: 1987, ‘Corridors in Real Landscapes: A Reply to Simberloff and Cox’,Conservation Biology 1, 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, S.J., M.E. Roelke, L. Marker, A. Newman, C.A. Winkler, D. Meltzer, L. Colly, J.F. Evermann, M. Bush, and D.E. Wildt: 1985, ‘Genetic Basis for Species Vulnerability in the Cheetah’,Science 227, 1428–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G.H., G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.): 1990,The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, D., S. Cairns, and T. Dillon: 1986, ‘Seven Forms of Rarity and Their Frequency in the Flora of the British Isles’, in M.E. Soulé (ed.),Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 182–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raloff, J.: 1989, ‘Endangered Species Need More Help’,Science News 135, No. 5, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T.: 1983,The Care for Animal Rights, University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelke, M.E., E.R. Jacobsen, G.V. Kollias, and J. Forrester: 1985,Medical Management and Biomedical Findings on the Florida Panther, Felis concolor coryi, July 1, 1983 to June 30, 1985, Appendix 1, Panther Health and Reproduction, Annual Performance Report E1–9, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J.C.: 1992, ‘Conserving Biological Diversity’, in L.R. Brownet al., State of the World 1992, W.W. Norton, New York, pp. 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S.: 1972,Epistemics and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.S.: 1985,Risk Analysis and Scientific Method, Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.S.: 1991,Risk and Rationality, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K.S., and E.D. McCoy: 1993,Method in Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.: 1986, Island Biogeographic Theory and Integrated Pest Management’, in M. Cogan (ed.),Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management Practice, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D.: 1987, ‘Simplification, Danger, and Ethics in Conservation Biology’,Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 68, 156–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., and J. Cox: 1987, ‘Consequences and Costs of Conservation Corridors,’ Conservation Biology1, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D., J.A. Farr, J. Cox, and D.W. Mehlmann: 1992, ‘Movement Corridors: Conservation Bargains or Expensive Snake Oil?’,Conservation Biology, in press.

  • Soulé, M.E.: 1986, ‘Conservation Biology and the ‘Real World’’, in M.E. Soulé (ed.),Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E.: 1989, ‘Conservation Biology in the Twenty-First Century: Summary and Outlook’, in D. Western and M.C. Pearl (eds.),Conservation for the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E., and K.A. Kohm (eds.): 1989,Research Priorities for Conservation Biology, Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, W.J.: 1990, ‘Summary of the Discussion’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.W.: 1986,Respect for Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service: 1986,Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants, 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service: 1987,Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) Recovery Plan, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, J. (ed.): 1990,Social Science and Natural Resource Recreation Management, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, R.K.,et al.: 1991, ‘Conservation Genetics of the Endangered Isle Royale Gray Wolf’,Conservation Biology 5, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, D.: 1989, ‘Conservation Biology’, in D. Western and M.C. Pearl (eds.),Conservation for the Twenth-First Century, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildt, D.E., J.G. Howard, L.L. Hall, and M. Bush: 1987, ‘The Reproductive Physiology of the Clouded Leopard [Neotelis nebulosa]: I. Electroejaculates contain high proportions of pleiomorphic spermatozoa throughout the year’,Biology of Reproduction 34, 937–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (ed.): 1988,Biodiversity, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.A.: 1991,Official List of Endangered and Potentially Endangered Fauna and Flora in Florida, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, O.S.: 1989, ‘The Problems of Conserving Genes and Species’, in D. Western and M.C. Pearl (eds.),Conservation for the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shrader-Frechette, K.S., Mccoy, E.D. Biodiversity, biological uncertainty, and setting conservation priorities. Biol Philos 9, 167–195 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857931

Key words

Navigation