Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inoculative Education

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper advocates for a shift from insular paternalism to developmental paternalism in education, contending that students' engagement with erroneous ideas is crucial for building the ability to resist harmful notions and support democracy. The proposed inoculative approach exposes students to problematic ideas, guiding them through the process of overcoming these beliefs using the pedagogy of relation. The author employs behavioral economics to explore the shortcomings of insular paternalism and the early Christian notion of metanoia to explain the importance of changing one's mind. This developmentally-informed approach fosters rational thinking and curbs extremist ideologies. The paper asserts that prioritizing an inoculative approach over an insulatory one equips students to navigate the complexities of the modern world and uphold democratic values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An, C.J. 2020. Participation, not paternalism: Moral education, normative competence and the child’s entry into the moral community. Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (2): 192–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, Hal R., and Catherine Blumer. 1985. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35 (1): 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine, S. 1948. Basic writings of Saint Augustine, vol. 1. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbacher, D. 2015. Paternalism in education and the future. In The nature of children’s well-being: Theory and practice, ed. A. Bagattini and C. Macleod, 107–122. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bushelle, Ethan David. 2015. The joy of the dharma: Esoteric Buddhism and the early medieval transformation of Japanese literature. (PhD diss.). https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/17467509/BUSHELLE-DISSERTATION-2015.pdf.

  • Gutmann, A. 1980. Children, paternalism, and education: A liberal argument. Philosophy & Public Affairs 9: 338–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapeliushnikov, Rostislav. 2015. Behavioral economics and the ‘new’ paternalism. Russian Journal of Economics 1 (1): 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel. 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: Univ of California Press (Original edition published 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, G. 2018. Paternalism and education. In The Routledge handbook of the philosophy of paternalism, ed. K. Grill and J. Hanna, 336–347. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorkin, Alexander M. 2022. Pedagogy of relation: Education after reform. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, Alexis. 2011. Repentance as the context of sainthood in the ascetical theology of Mark the Monk. Studies in Church History 47: 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0424208400000863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1973. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1978. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. In Uncertainty in economics, ed. P. Diamond and M. Rothschild, 17–34. New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. California State University Sacramento, Eureka Hall 206, MS 6079, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA, 95819, USA

    Alexander M. Sidorkin

Authors
  1. Alexander M. Sidorkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander M. Sidorkin.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sidorkin, A.M. Inoculative Education. Stud Philos Educ 42, 469–480 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09888-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-023-09888-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation