Reconstructing Relativism. An Analysis of Radbruch‘s Philosophy of Law

Subscibe in publisher´s online store Share via email
Reconstructing Relativism. An Analysis of Radbruch‘s Philosophy of Law
Sieckmann, Jan-R.

From the journal ARSP Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Volume 95, March 2009, issue 1

Published by Franz Steiner Verlag

article, 7355 Words
Original language: English
ARSP 2009, pp 14-27
https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2009-0002

Abstract

This paper aims at reconstructing Radbruch’s relativistic conception of law within the framework of a model of principles. The idea of relativism remains a disputed issue in current legal and moral philosophy. In spite of the fact that Radbruch’s legal philosophy lacks coherence, it includes elements that resemble modern conceptions of law as a system including principles to be balanced against each other. Therefore, a reconstruction within a model of principles might as well prove the fruitfulness of the model of principles as render a more appropriate theoretical framework for Radbruch’s legal philosophy. After an outline of Radbruch’s relativism, I will discuss some critical points of his approach and, subsequently, present a reconstruction according to the model of principles, which makes plausible at least some of Radbruch’s contentions.

Author information

Jan-R. Sieckmann