Conclusion
The facts aboutsuch, then, indicate not just thatsuch is a pro-adjective, but also that binding conditions apply broadly to pro-ADJs and pro-CNs, as well as to a wide range of pro-arguments. If this is true, the CN binding process accomplished by rules (40) and (41) might better be expressed in a system that uses a Cooper (1979) store mechanism. In fact, Stump (p. 144) notes that this could easily be done. Meanings of the type of∨ P n could be stored, just as NP meanings are, until an appropriate binding CN phrase was encountered. Binding conditions would simply require that a∨ P n meaning not come out of storage until the derivation had emerged from its governing category. The behavior of the pro-adjectivesuch suggests that an expression of any category, if it is legitimately translatable as a variable, may be a fullfledged proform; many principles and mechanisms described to account for the widely studied pronouns in fact apply to nonargument categories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bach, Emmon, and Barbara Partee: 1980, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’, in Jody Kreiman and A. E. Ojeda (eds.),Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
Bresnan, Joan W.: 1973, ‘Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English’,Linguistic Inquiry 4(3), 275–343.
Carlson, Gregory N.: 1980,Reference to Kinds in English, Garland, New York.
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Sally McConnell-Ginet: 1990,Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics, MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures, Foris, Dordrecht.
Cooper, Robin: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in Frank Heny and Helmut S. Schnelle (eds.),Syntax and Semantics, Volume 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table. Academic Press, New York.
Lakoff, George: 1968/1976, ‘Pronouns and Reference’, distributed 1968 by Indiana University
Linguistics Club. Reprinted 1976 in J. McCawley (ed.),Notes from Linguistic Underground, Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7, pp. 275–336.
Montague, Richard: 1974, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in Richmond H. Thomason (ed.)Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Nerbonne, John, and Masayo Iida, and William Ladusaw: 1991, ‘Semantics of Common Noun Phrase Anaphora’, in Aaron L. Halpern (ed.),Proceedings of the Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford University.
Partee, Barbara H.: 1978, ‘Bound Variables and Other Anaphors’, in D. Waltz (ed.),Proceedings of TINLAP-2, University of Illinois.
Partee, Barbara H., and Emmon Bach: 1981, ‘Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora’, in Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M. V. Janssen and Martin Stokhof (eds.),Truth, Interpretation, and Information. Foris, Dordrecht.
Perry, John: 1979, ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’,Nous 13, 3–21.
Siegel, Muffy E. A.: 1976, ‘Capturing the Russian Adjective’, in Barbara H. Partee (ed.),Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.
Siegel, Muffy E. A.: 1979, ‘Measure Adjectives in Montague Grammar’, in Steven Davis and Marianne Mithun (eds.),Linguistics, Philosophy and Montague Grammar, University of Texas Press, Austin.
Siegel, Muffy E. A.: 1980,Capturing the Adjective, Garland, New York.
Stump, Gregory: 1978,Common Noun Anaphora as Variable Binding in Montague Grammar, Unpublished MA thesis, Ohio State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am very grateful to David Dowty for the generous amounts of advice he gave me on earlier drafts of this paper. In addition, I would like to thank Jim Collins, Jeff Kaplan, Nikki Barrett Keach, Marcia Linebarger, Louis Mangione, Gary Milsark, Barbara Partee, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on some earlier drafts. Any remaining errors are, of course, mine alone. My thanks also go to Marie-Cline Fauve, Monika Gutsche, Ursula Hahn, Gary Milsark, Jean Lowenstamm, Gwendolyn Roget, Angela Wahlgren, and Juergen Weissenborn for help with German and French.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siegel, M.E.A. Such: Binding and the pro-adjective. Linguist Philos 17, 481–497 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985832
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985832