Skip to main content
Log in

‘Social phonology’ in the USSR in the 1920s

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the 1920s and 1930s, some of the most talented linguists of the Soviet Union, among whom one can highlight N.F. Jakovlev and E.D. Polivanov, were involved in the process of “language building”. Their role in the success of this process is examined from the point of view of the phonological theory that they developed for creating scripts for the numerous peoples of the Soviet Union, Turkic and Caucasian above all. Jakovlev’s phonology, that Polivanov termed “social phonology”, was very different from the one that N. Trubetskoj proposed some 10 years later. We will try to explain their ambitious script projects, which remain difficult to understand from the point of view of the modern phonology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On the use of the term ‘language building’ in relation to the USSR, see Fierman, 1991, pp. 1–11.

  2. We can say that here Jakovlev develops Ščerba’s thesis about the distinctive or the meaning-differentiating function of phonemes (smyslorazličitel’naja funkcija).

  3. Note Jakovlev’s use of the terminology of the Leningrad School here.

  4. For more details concerning the reception of Saussure’s ideas in the USSR, see Chudakova and Toddes, (1982).

  5. Troubeztkoj reviewed them the Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris (Meillet, 1929; Troubeztkoj, 1925), where he noted the importance of Jakovlev’s researches on Northeast Caucasian languages several times (Troubeztkoj, 1925, p. 286; Troubetskoi, 1937 (2000), pp. 52, 144, 173, 257, 295; Dumézil 1934, p. 32).

References

  • Anderson, S. R. (1985). Phonology in the twentieth century. Theories of rules and theories of representations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashnin, A. (1995). ‘N.Ja. Jakovlev 1892–1874’. Histoire-Epistémologie-Langage, 17(II), 147–161.

  • Ashnin, F. D., & Alpatov, V. M. (1994). ‘Žizn’ i trudy Nikolaia Feofanoviča Jakovleva’. Izvestiia AN SSSR, Serijiia literatury i jazyka, 53(4), 81–86; (5), 77–85.

  • Beljaev, M. V., (1930). ‘Grammatičeskaja sistema kavkazskix (jafetičeskikh) jazykov’, In A. Khadžiev, N. Jakovlev, & M. Beljaev (Eds.), Kul’tura i pis’mennost’ gorskix narodov Severnogo Kavkaza, (Vladikavkaz), pp. 61–98.

  • Brandist, C. (2003). ‘The origins of Soviet Sociolinguistics. Journal of sociolinguistics, 7/2, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudakova, M. O., & Toddes, E. (1982). ‘La premiere traduction russe du Cours de linguistique géné227rale de F. de saussure et l’activite du cercle linguistique de Moscou. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 36, 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumézil, G. (1934). Méthodes et moeurs de la linguistique caucasienne, Réponse au Prince Troubezskoy. Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierman, W. (1991). Language planning and national development. The Uzbek experience. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iakobson, R. O. (1963). Essais de linguistique générale, Paris, Minuit, «Arguments»

  • Jakovlev, N. F. (1923). Tablicy fonetiki kabardinskogo jazyka. Moskva: Institut Voskotovedeniia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakovlev, N. F. (1928) .‘Matematičeskaja formula dlja postroenija alfavita’. Kul’tura i pis’mennost’ Vostoka, no 1, Baku.

  • Jakovlev, N. F. (1931). ‘“Analitičeskii˝ ili ˝novij˝ alfavit?’, Kul’tura i pis’mennost’ Vostoka no X, 43–60.

  • Meillet, A. (1929). ‘Jakovlev “Materials for Kabardey dictionary. Fasc.I. Dictionary of monosyllabic rootwords and roots of the open-syllabe type”, Moscou (Central’noe izdatel’stvo narodov SSSR) 1927’, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, vol. XXIX, pp. 239–142.

  • Phillips, K. H. (1986). Language theories Of the Early Soviet period. Exeter: Exeter Linguistic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polivanov, E. D. (1927). ‘Specifičeskie osobennosti poslednego desjatiletija 1917–1927 v istorii nashej lingvističeskoi mysli (vmesto predislovija)’, In E. Polivanov (Ed.), Statii po obščemu jazykoznaniju. Izbrannye raboty (Moskva, 1968), pp. 51–56.

  • Polivanov, E. D. (1929) ‘Krug očerednykh problem sovremennoj lingvistiki’, In E. Polivanov (Ed.), Statii po obščemu jazykoznaniju. Izbrannye raboty (Moskva, 1968), pp. 178–186.

  • Polivanov, E. D. (1933). Uzbekskaja dialektologija i uzbekskij literatutnyj jazyk. Taškent: Uzgosizdat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov, M. B. (1999). Osnovnye Fonologičeskie Napravleniia V Rusistike. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, Ferdinand De, (1916). Cours de linguistique générale, Ch. Bally, A. Sechehaye, & A. Riedlinger (Eds.), (Paris: Payot), 1969.

  • Ščerba, Lev Vladimirovič, (1912). ‘Russkie glasnye v količestvennom i kačestvennom otnošenii’, in Lev Ščerba, Izbrannye raboty po jazykoznaniju i fonetike. tom I, 1958 (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta), pp. 124–153, reprint in Jazykovaja sistema i rečevaia dejatel’nost’, 1974, pp. 110–125.

  • Ščerba, (1915) Vostočnolužickoe narečie (Petrograd).

  • Simonato, E (2005). Le kabarde, langue minoritaire du Caucase, et la réflexion linguistique dans l’URSS des années 1920–1930. Slavica Occitania, 20, 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. G. (1993). The Eurasian imperative in early Soviet language planning: Russian linguists at the service of the nationalities. In G. S. Susan (Ed.), Beyond sovietology, Essays in politics and history (pp. 159–191). New York, London: Armonk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. G. (1998). Language and power in the creation of the USSR, 1917–1953. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenografičeskii otčet četvertogo Plenuma Central’nogo Komiteta Novogo Alfavita, proiskhodivšego v gor. Alma-Ata 6 maja–13 maja 1930g., 1931.

  • Stenografičeskii otčet vtorogo Plenuma Vsesojuznogo Central’nogo Komiteta Novogo Alfavita, zasedavšego v Taškente ot 7 po 12 janvarja 1928 goda, 1929 (Baku).

  • Strelkov, P. G. (1929). K voprosu o foneme. Sbornik Obščestva istoričeskikh, filosofskikh i social’nykh nauk pri Permskom universitete, III, 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhotin, A. M. (1928). Tezisy k dokladu-referatu o Kurse obščej lingvistiki Ferdinanda de-Sossjura. Voprosy jazykoznaniia, 6, 142–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhotin, A. M. (1932). Spor ob unifikacii alfavitov. Revoljucija i pis’mennost, 1–2(11–12), 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troubetskoi, N. S. (1933). La phonologie actuelle. Journal de psychologie, 30, 227–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troubetskoi, N. S. (1937) Principes de phonologie, transl. Jean Cantineau, 2000 (Paris: C. Klicksieck).

  • Troubetzkoi, N. S. (1975) Letters and notes (Berlin).

  • Troubeztkoj, N. S. (1925) ‘Trudy podrazrjada issledovanija severno-kavkazskix jazykov pri Institute Vostokovedenija v Moskve.—(Travaux de la Section des langues du Caucase septentrional de l’Institut Oriental à Moscou).—N° 1 : N. jakovlev, Tablicy fonetiki kabardinskogo jazyka (Tables phonétiques de la langue cabardë), Moscou, 1923.—N° 2 : M. jAkovlev, Slovar’ primerov k tablicam fonetiki kabardinskogo jazyka (Glossaire des exemples aux tables phonétiques de la langue cabardé), Moscou, 1923.—N° 3 : L. zhirkov, Grammatika avarskogo jazyka (Grammaire de la langue awar), Moscou, 1924’, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, vol. XXVI, pp. 277–286.

  • Vilkou-Pustovaia, I. (2003). La valeur dans la phonologie saussurienne. pragoise et soviétique. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft, 13, 41–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Simonato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simonato, E. ‘Social phonology’ in the USSR in the 1920s. Stud East Eur Thought 60, 339–347 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-008-9065-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-008-9065-8

Keywords

Navigation